Show simple item record

Cyclotron Instrumentation for Nuclear Spectroscopy at Medium Resolution in Energy

dc.contributor.authorBach, David Rudolphen_US
dc.contributor.authorChilds, W. J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHockney, R. W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHough, Paul V. C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorParkinson, William Charlesen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-05-06T23:25:31Z
dc.date.available2010-05-06T23:25:31Z
dc.date.issued1956-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationBach, D. R.; Childs, W. J.; Hockney, R. W.; Hough, P. V. C.; Parkinson, W. C. (1956). "Cyclotron Instrumentation for Nuclear Spectroscopy at Medium Resolution in Energy." Review of Scientific Instruments 27(7): 516-526. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/71238>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/71238
dc.description.abstractThe instrumentation for the magnetic focusing and analysis of the external beam of the Michigan cyclotron is described. It provides to a scattering chamber in an adjacent room a beam of deuterons of a few tenths microampere monoenergetic to within 15 kev at a mean energy of 7.8 Mev. A double‐focusing analyzer magnet of mean radius one meter, focuses reaction products of magnetic rigidity less than or equal to that of a 20‐Mev proton. At the optimum energy resolution of the system, proton groups from (d,p) reactions differing in Q by about 20 kev can be resolved. Particles can be observed over a continuum of angles from −7° to +112° relative to the incident beam. The determination of reaction energies and the measurement of relative differential cross sections are discussed.en_US
dc.format.extent3102 bytes
dc.format.extent1193969 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherThe American Institute of Physicsen_US
dc.rights© The American Institute of Physicsen_US
dc.titleCyclotron Instrumentation for Nuclear Spectroscopy at Medium Resolution in Energyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPhysicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumHarrison M. Randall Laboratory of Physics, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/71238/2/RSINAK-27-7-516-1.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1063/1.1715622en_US
dc.identifier.sourceReview of Scientific Instrumentsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParkinson, Beach, and King, Phys. Rev. 87, 387(L) (1952).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan Patter, Endt, Sperduto, and Buechner, Phys. Rev. 86, 502 (1952).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeach, Childs, Hough, King, and Parkinson, Phys. Rev. 86, 582(A) (1952).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP. V. C. Hough, Rev. Sci. Instr. 24, 42 (1953).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. Grismore and W. C. Parkinson (to be published).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceObtained from Consolidated Water Power and Paper Company, Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. L. Lawson and A. W. Tyler, Rev. Sci. Instr. 10, 304 (1939).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. Judd, Rev. Sci. Instr. 21, 213 (1950).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceE. S. Rosenblum, Rev. Sci. Instr. 21, 586 (1950).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFor reaction protons of energy greater than 1 Mev, single scattering is most important. See E. Segre, Experimental Nuclear Physics (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1953), p. 249 ff.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParkinson, Grover, and Crane, Rev. Sci. Instr. 18, 734 (1947).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceK. Siegbahn and Svartholm, Arkiv. Mat. Astron. Fysik 33A, No. 21 (1946).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceModel V‐4400, Varian Associates, Palo Alto, California.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceModel 524A, Hewlett‐Packard, Palo Alto, California.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP. M. Endt and J. C. Kluyver, Revs. Modern Phys. 26, 95 (1954), and references therein.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceF. B. Shull and D. M. Dennison, Phys. Rev. 71, 681 (1947), and 72, 256 (1947).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. S. Livingston and H. A. Bethe, Revs. Modern Phys. 9, 245 (1937).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceG. H. Briggs, Revs. Modern Phys. 26, 1 (1954).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThe method was proposed by Bach and Hockney, and has been demonstrated experimentally by Bach.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown, Snyder, Fowler, and Lauritsen, Phys. Rev. 82, 159 (1951), Appendices A, B, and C.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeterson, Fowler, and Lauritsen, Phys. Rev. 96, 1250 (1954), the un‐numbered formula, p. 1257.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEnge, Buechner, and Sperduto, Phys. Rev. 88, 963 (1952).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. T. Butler, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A208, 559 (1951).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFor this and for other references see the review article by S. K. Allison and S. D. Warshaw, Revs. Modern Phys. 25, 779 (1953).en_US
dc.owningcollnamePhysics, Department of


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.