View Item 

Show simple item record

Characteristics Associated with Liver Graft Failure: The Concept of a Donor Risk Index

dc.contributor.authorFeng, Sandyen_US
dc.contributor.authorGoodrich, Nathan P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBragg-Gresham, Jennifer L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDykstra, Dawn M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPunch, Jeffery D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDeb Roy, M. A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGreenstein, S. M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMerion, Robert M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T18:10:45Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T18:10:45Z
dc.date.issued2006-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationFeng, S.; Goodrich, N.P.; Bragg-Gresham, J.L.; Dykstra, D.M.; Punch, J.D.; DebRoy, M.A.; Greenstein, S.M.; Merion, R.M. (2006). "Characteristics Associated with Liver Graft Failure: The Concept of a Donor Risk Index." American Journal of Transplantation 6(4): 783-790. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/71391>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-6135en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-6143en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/71391
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=16539636&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent204383 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights2006 The Authors Journal compilation © 2006 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeonsen_US
dc.titleCharacteristics Associated with Liver Graft Failure: The Concept of a Donor Risk Indexen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity Renal Research and Education Association, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumScientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid16539636en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/71391/1/j.1600-6143.2006.01242.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01242.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Transplantationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBusuttil RW, Tanaka K. The utility of marginal donors in liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2003; 9: 651 – 663.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePort FK, Bragg-Gresham JL, Metzger RA et al. Donor characteristics associated with reduced graft survival: an approach to expanding the pool of kidney donors. Transplantation 2002; 74: 1281 – 1286.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBotta F, Giannini E, Romagnoli P et al. MELD scoring system is useful for predicting prognosis in patients with liver cirrhosis and is correlated with residual liver function: a European study. Gut 2003; 52: 134 – 139.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKamath PS, Wiesner RH, Malinchoc M et al. A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology 2001; 33: 464 – 470.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWiesner R, Edwards E, Freeman R et al. Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers. Gastroenterology 2003; 124: 91 – 96.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWolfe RA, Schaubel DE, Webb RL et al. Analytical approaches for transplant research. Am J Transplant 2004; 4 ( Suppl 9 ): 106 – 113.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllison PD. Missing data. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Volume 136. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications; 2002.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDetre KM, Lombardero M, Belle S et al. Influence of donor age on graft survival after liver transplantation—United Network for Organ Sharing Registry. Liver Transpl Surg 1995; 1: 311 – 319.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYersiz H, Shaked A, Olthoff K et al. Correlation between donor age and the pattern of liver graft recovery after transplantation. Transplantation 1995; 60: 790 – 794.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoofnagle JH, Lombardero M, Zetterman RK et al. Donor age and outcome of liver transplantation. Hepatology 1996; 24: 89 – 96.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOh CK, Sanfey HA, Pelletier SJ, Sawyer RG, McCullough CS, Pruett TL. Implication of advanced donor age on the outcome of liver transplantation. Clin Transplant 2000; 14 ( 4 Pt 2 ): 386 – 390.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBusquets J, Xiol X, Figueras J et al. The impact of donor age on liver transplantation: influence of donor age on early liver function and on subsequent patient and graft survival. Transplantation 2001; 71: 1765 – 1771.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference13.  2004 Annual Report of the U.S. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients: Transplant Data 1994–2003. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Special Programs Bureau, Division of Transplantation, Rockville, MD; United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, VA; University Renal Research and Education Association, Ann Arbor, MI. 2004.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGruenberger T, Steininger R, Sautner T, Mittlbock M, Muhlbacher F. Influence of donor criteria on postoperative graft function after orthotopic liver transplantation. Transpl Int 1994; 7 ( Suppl 1 ): S672 – S674.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGonzalez FX, Rimola A, Grande L et al. Predictive factors of early postoperative graft function in human liver transplantation. Hepatology 1994; 20: 565 – 573.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStrasberg SM, Howard TK, Molmenti EP, Hertl M. Selecting the donor liver: risk factors for poor function after orthotopic liver transplantation. Hepatology 1994; 20 ( 4 Pt 1 ): 829 – 838.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBriceno J, Solorzano G, Pera C. A proposal for scoring marginal liver grafts. Transpl Int 2000; 13 ( Suppl 1 ): S249 – S252.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarkmann JF, Markmann JW, Markmann DA et al. Preoperative factors associated with outcome and their impact on resource use in 1148 consecutive primary liver transplants. Transplantation 2001; 72: 1113 – 1122.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZamboni F, Franchello A, David E et al. Effect of macrovescicular steatosis and other donor and recipient characteristics on the outcome of liver transplantation. Clin Transplant 2001; 15: 53 – 57.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGhobrial RM, Gornbein J, Steadman R et al. Pretransplant model to predict posttransplant survival in liver transplant patients. Ann Surg 2002; 236: 315 – 322; discussion 322–323.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBilbao I, Armadans L, Lazaro JL, Hidalgo E, Castells L, Margarit C. Predictive factors for early mortality following liver transplantation. Clin Transplant 2003; 17: 401 – 411.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRull R, Vidal O, Momblan D et al. Evaluation of potential liver donors: limits imposed by donor variables in liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2003; 9: 389 – 393.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFurukawa H, Todo S, Imventarza O et al. Effect of cold ischemia time on the early outcome of human hepatic allografts preserved with UW solution. Transplantation 1991; 51: 1000 – 1004.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarsman WA, Wiesner RH, Rodriguez L et al. Use of fatty donor liver is associated with diminished early patient and graft survival. Transplantation 1996; 62: 1246 – 1251.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSelzner M, Clavien PA. Fatty liver in liver transplantation and surgery. Semin Liver Dis 2001; 21: 105 – 113.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVerran D, Kusyk T, Painter D et al. Clinical experience gained from the use of 120 steatotic donor livers for orthotopic liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2003; 9 ( 5 ): 500 – 505.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTotsukali E, Fung JJ, Ishizawa Y et al. Synergistic effect of cold and warm ischemia time on postoperative graft outcome in human liver transplantation. Hepatogastroenterology 2004; 51: 1413 – 1416.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFranzen LE, Ekstedt M, Kechagias S, Bodin L. Semiquantitative evaluation overestimates the degree of steatosis in liver biopsies: a comparison to stereological point counting. Mod Pathol 2005; 18: 912 – 916.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFiorini RN, Kirtz J, Periyasamy B et al. Development of an unbiased method for the estimation of liver steatosis. Clin Transplant 2004; 18: 700 – 706.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGhobrial RM, Yersiz H, Farmer DG et al. Predictors of survival after In vivo split liver transplantation: analysis of 110 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 2000; 232: 312 – 323.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAzoulay D, Castaing D, Adam R et al. Split-liver transplantation for two adult recipients: feasibility and long-term outcomes. Ann Surg 2001; 233: 565 – 574.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHumar A, Ramcharan T, Sielaff TD et al. Split liver transplantation for two adult recipients: an initial experience. Am J Transplant 2001; 1: 366 – 372.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMerion RM, Rush SH, Dykstra DM Goodrich N, Freeman RB, Jr, Wolfe RA. Predicted lifetimes for adult and pediatric split liver versus adult whole liver transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 2004; 4: 1792 – 1797.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMerion RM. When is a patient too well and when is a patient too sick for a liver transplant? Liver Transpl 2004; 10 ( 10 Suppl 2 ): S69 – S73.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMerion RM, Schaubel DE, Dykstra DM et al. The survival benefit of liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 307 – 313.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmin MG, Wolf MP, TenBrook JA, Jr et al. Expanded criteria donor grafts for deceased donor liver transplantation under the MELD system: a decision analysis. Liver Transpl 2004; 10: 1468 – 1475.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1600-6143.2006.01242.x.pdf
Size:
199.5KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.