Show simple item record

Community Action Against Asthma

dc.contributor.authorParker, Edith A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorIsrael, Barbara A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Melinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrakefield-Caldwell, Wilmaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLewis, Toby C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRobins, Thomas G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRamirez, Erminiaen_US
dc.contributor.authorRowe, Zacharyen_US
dc.contributor.authorKeeler, Gerald J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T18:11:13Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T18:11:13Z
dc.date.issued2003-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationParker, Edith A.; Israel, Barbara A.; Williams, Melina; Brakefield-Caldwell, Wilma; Lewis, Toby C.; Robins, Thomas; Ramirez, Erminia; Rowe, Zachary; Keeler, Gerald (2003). "Community Action Against Asthma." Journal of General Internal Medicine 18(7): 558-567. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/71398>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0884-8734en_US
dc.identifier.issn1525-1497en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/71398
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=12848839&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractCommunity Action Against Asthma (CAAA) is a community-based participatory research (CBPR) project that assesses the effects of outdoor and indoor air quality on exacerbation of asthma in children, and tests household- and neighborhood-level interventions to reduce exposure to environmental asthma triggers. Representatives of community-based organizations, academia, an integrated health system, and the local health department work in partnership on CAAA's Steering Committee (SC) to design and implement the project. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a process evaluation of the CAAA community–academic partnership. DESIGN: In-depth interviews containing open-ended questions were conducted with SC members. Analysis included established methods for qualitative data, including focused coding and constant comparison methods. SETTING: Community setting in Detroit, Michigan. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-three members of the CAAA SC. MEASUREMENTS: Common themes identified by SC members relating to the partnership's ability to achieve project goals and the successes and challenges facing the partnership itself. MAIN RESULTS: Identified partnership accomplishments included: successful implementation of a complex project, identification of children with previously undiagnosed asthma, and diverse participation and community influence in SC decisions. Challenges included ensuring all partners' influence in decision-making, the need to adjust to “a different way of doing things” in CBPR, constraints and costs of doing CBPR felt by all partners, ongoing need for communication and maintaining trust, and balancing the needs of science and the community through intervention. CONCLUSIONS: CBPR can enhance and facilitate basic research, but care must be given to trust issues, governance issues, organizational culture, and costs of participation for all organizations involved.en_US
dc.format.extent129260 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Science Incen_US
dc.rights2003 by the Society of General Internal Medicineen_US
dc.subject.otherCommunity-based Participatory Researchen_US
dc.subject.otherAsthmaen_US
dc.subject.otherPartnershipen_US
dc.subject.otherProcess Evaluationen_US
dc.titleCommunity Action Against Asthmaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumReceived from the University of Michigan Schools of Public Health (EAP, BAI, MW, TCL, TR, GK) and Medicine (TCL), Ann Arbor, Mich; Detroit Health Department (WB-C), Community Health and Social Services Center (ER), and Friends of Parkside (ZR), Detroit, Mich.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid12848839en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/71398/1/j.1525-1497.2003.20322.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20322.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of General Internal Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreen LW, Mercer SL. Can public health researchers and agencies reconcile the push from funding bodies and the pull from communities? Am J Public Health. 2001; 91: 1926 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIsrael BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998; 19: 173 – 202.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarnett K. Collaboration for Community Empowerment: Redefining the Role of Academic Institutions. Berkeley, Calif: Center for Community Health, School of Public Health, University of California at Berkeley; 1993.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuchanan DR. Building academic-community linkages for health promotion: a case study in Massachusetts. Am J Health Promot. 1996; 10: 262 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFals-Borda O, Rahman MA. Action and Knowledge: Breaking the Monopoly with Participatory Action Research. New York, NY: Intermediate Technology Publishers/Apex; 1991.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhyte WF. Participatory Action Research. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications, Inc.; 1991.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIsrael BA, Lichtenstein R, Lantz PM, et al. The Detroit Community-Academic Urban Research Center: development, implementation and evaluation. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2001; 7: 1 – 19.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLantz P, Viruell-Fuentes E, Israel BA, Softley D, Guzman JR. Can communities and academia work together on public health research? Evaluation results from a community-based participatory research partnership in Detroit. J Urban Health. 2001; 78: 495 – 507.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference9. U.S. Bureau of Census. Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, DC; 1990.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIsrael BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998; 19: 173 – 202.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePatton MQ. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 3 rd ed. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications; 2001.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStrauss A, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications, Inc.; 1994.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZimmerman MA, Israel BA, Freudenberg N, Becker MH, Janz N. Evaluating twelve AIDS prevention interventions: methodology. In: Freudenberg N, Zimmerman MA, eds. AIDS Prevention in the Community: Lessons from the First Decade. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 1995: 199 – 220.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlter C, Hage J. Organizations Working Together. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications, Inc.; 1993.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceButterfoss FD, Goodman RM, Wandersman A. Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion. Health Educ Res. 1993; 8: 315 – 30.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFlorin P, Mitchell R, Stevenson J. Identifying technical needs in community coalitions: a developmental approach. Health Educ Res. 1993; 8: 417 – 32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIsrael BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Community-based participatory research: policy recommendations for promoting a partnership approach in health research. Education for Health. 2001; 14: 182 – 97.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.