Show simple item record

The prediction of professional behaviour

dc.contributor.authorStern, David T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFrohna, Alice Z.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGruppen, Larry D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T18:20:20Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T18:20:20Z
dc.date.issued2005-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationStern, David T; Frohna, Alice Z; Gruppen, Larry D (2005). "The prediction of professional behaviour." Medical Education 39(1): 75-82. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/71548>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0308-0110en_US
dc.identifier.issn1365-2923en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/71548
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=15612903&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to establish outcome measures for professionalism in medical students and to identify predictors of these outcomes. Design  Retrospective cohort study. Setting  A US medical school. Participants  All students entering in 1995 and graduating within 5 years. Measures  Outcome measures included review board identification of professionalism problems and clerkship evaluations for items pertaining to professionalism. Pre-clinical predictor variables included material from the admissions application, completion of required course evaluations, students' self-reporting of immunisation compliance, students' performance on standardised patient (SP) exercises, and students' self-assessed performance on SP exercises. Results  The outcome measures of clerkship professionalism scores were found to be highly reliable (alpha 0.88–0.96). No data from the admissions material was found to be predictive of professional behaviour in the clinical years. Using multivariate regression, failing to complete required course evaluations (B = 0.23) and failing to report immunisation compliance (B = 0.29) were significant predictors of unprofessional behaviour found by the review board in subsequent years. Immunisation non-compliance predicted low overall clerkship professional evaluation scores (B = − 0.34). Student self-assessment accuracy (SP score minus self-assessed score) (B = 0.03) and immunisation non-compliance (B = 0.54) predicted the internal medicine clerkship professionalism score. Conclusions  This study identifies a set of reliable, context-bound outcome measures in professionalism. Although we searched for predictors of behaviour in the admissions application and other domains commonly felt to be predictive of professionalism, we found significant predictors only in domains where students had had opportunities to demonstrate conscientious behaviour or humility in self-assessment.en_US
dc.format.extent99474 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Science Ltden_US
dc.rights2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.subject.otherEducationen_US
dc.subject.otherMedicalen_US
dc.subject.otherUndergraduate/*Standardsen_US
dc.subject.otherProfessional Competence/*Standardsen_US
dc.subject.otherEducational Measurement/Standardsen_US
dc.subject.otherRetrospective Studyen_US
dc.subject.otherCohort Studyen_US
dc.subject.otherUnited Statesen_US
dc.titleThe prediction of professional behaviouren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducationen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumVA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Medical Education, University of Michigan, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid15612903en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/71548/1/j.1365-2929.2004.02035.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02035.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceMedical Educationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeabody FW. The care of the patient. JAMA 1927; 88: 877 – 82.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuff KL, Koenig JA, Treptau MM, Sireci SG. Validity of MCAT scores for predicting clerkship performance of medical students grouped by sex and ethnicity. Acad Med 1999; 74 ( Suppl ): 41 – 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwanson DB, Case SM, Koenig J, Killian CD. Preliminary study of the accuracies of the old and new medical college admission tests for predicting performance on USMLE Step 1. Acad Med 1996; 71 ( Suppl ): 25 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference4  Association of American Medical Colleges. Learning Objectives for Medical Education. http://www.aamc.org/meded/msop/msop1.pdf. [Accessed September 29, 2003.]en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference5  General Medical Council. Good Medical Practice. http://www.gmc-uk.org/med_ed/default.htm. [Accessed September 29, 2003.]en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCruess SR, Cruess RL. Professionalism must be taught. BMJ 1997; 315: 1674 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGinsburg S, Regehr G, Hatala R, McNaughton N, Frohna A, Hodges B, Lingard L, Stern DT. Context, conflict, and resolution: a new conceptual framework for evaluating professionalism. Acad Med 2000; 75: S6 – S11.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEpstein RM, Hundert EM. Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA 2002; 287: 226 – 35.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChristakis NA. The similarity and frequency of proposals to reform US medical education. Constant concerns. JAMA 1995; 274 ( 9 ): 706 – 11.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFox R. Training in caring competence: the perennial problem in North American medical education. In: Hendrie HC, Lloyd C, eds. Educating Competent and Humane Physicians. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press 1990; 199 – 216.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference11  General Medical Council. Tomorrow's Doctors: Recommendations on Undergraduate Medical Education. http://www.gmc-uk.org/med_ed/default.htm. [Accessed September 29, 2003.]en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference12  American Board of Internal Medicine, ACP-ASIM Foundation and the European Federation of Internal Medicine. Charter on Professionalism. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136: 243 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStern D. Practising what we preach? An analysis of the curriculum of values in medical education. Am J Med 1998; 104: 569 – 75.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStewart JB. Blind Eye: How the Medical Establishment let a Doctor get away with Murder. New York: Simon and Schuster 1999.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference15  Anonymous. Doctors in the dock. The Economist. London: February 3, 2001; 358: 24.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBenor DE, Notzer N, Sheehan TJ, Norman GR. Moral reasoning as a criterion for admission to medical school. Med Educ 1984; 18 ( 6 ): 423 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavid H, Nicholaou T. A comparison of the interviewing skills of first and final year medical students. Med Educ 1992; 26: 441 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrislin MD, Lie D, Shapiro J, Boker J, Radecki S. Using standardised patients to assess medical students' professionalism. Acad Med 2001; 76: S90 – S92.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSelf D, Olivarez M, Baldwin D Jr. Clarifying the relationship of medical education and moral development. Acad Med 1998; 73: 517 – 20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSelf DJ, Olivarez M, Baldwin DC Jr. The amount of small group, case study discussion needed to improve moral reasoning skills of medical students. Acad Med 1998; 73: 521 – 3.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference21  University of Michigan Medical School. Admissions. 2003 http://www.med.umich.edu/medschool/students/admissions.html. [Accessed September 29, 2003.]en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEdwards JC, Elam CL, Wagoner NE. An admission model for medical schools. Acad Med 2001; 76: 1207 – 12.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWright N, Tanner MS. Medical students' compliance with simple administrative tasks and success in final examinations: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2002; 324: 1554 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGordon MJ. A review of the validity and accuracy of self-assessments in health professional training. Acad Med 1991; 66: 762 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHodges B, Regehr G, Martin D. Difficulties in recognising one's own incompetence: novice physicians who are unskilled and unaware of it. Acad Med 2001; 76 ( Suppl ): 87 – 9.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.