View Item 

Show simple item record

Understanding the Judicial Role in Addressing Gender Bias: A View from the Eighth Circuit Federal Court System
dc.contributor.authorLonsway, Kimberly A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFreeman, Leslie V.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCortina, Lilia M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMagley, Vicki J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFitzgerald, Louise F.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T18:21:44Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T18:21:44Z
dc.date.issued2002-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationLonsway, Kimberly A.; Freeman, Leslie V.; Cortina, Lilia M.; Magley, Vicki J.; Fitzgerald, Louise F. (2002). "Understanding the Judicial Role in Addressing Gender Bias: A View from the Eighth Circuit Federal Court System." Law & Social Inquiry 27(2): 205-234. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/71571>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0897-6546en_US
dc.identifier.issn1747-4469en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/71571
dc.format.extent1673956 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights2002 American Bar Foundationen_US
dc.titleUnderstanding the Judicial Role in Addressing Gender Bias: A View from the Eighth Circuit Federal Court Systemen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelLaw and Legal Studiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelGovernment, Politics and Lawen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumLilia M. Cortina is assistant professor in the Department of Psychology and Women's Studies, University of Michigan, Ann Arboren_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherKimberly A. Lonsway is research director at the National Center for Women and Policing, Feminist Majority Foundation, Los Angelesen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherLeslie V. Freeman is managing attorney at Legal Services of Eastern Missouri, St. Louisen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherVicki J. Magley is assistant professor in the Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrsen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherLouise F. Fitzgerald is professor of psychology and women's studies at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/71571/1/j.1747-4469.2002.tb00803.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1747-4469.2002.tb00803.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceLaw & Social Inquiryen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Bar Association. 1972. Model Code of Judicial Conduct. Chicago: American Bar Association.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Bar Association. 1990. Model Code of Judicial Conduct. Chicago: American Bar Association.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurger, Warren E. 1971. The Necessity for Civility. 52 F. R. D. 211.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCortina, Lilia M., Kimberly A. Lonsway, Vicki J. Magley, Leslie V. Freeman, Linda L. Collinsworth, Mary K. Hunter, and Louise F. Fitzgerald. 2002. What's Gender Got To Do with It? Incivility in the Federal Courts. Law & Social Inquiry 27 ( 2 ): 235 – 270.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. C. Circuit Task Force on Gender, Race and Ethnic Bias. 1996. Draft Final Report of the Special Committee on Gender to the D. C. Circuit Task Force on Gender, Race and Ethnic Bias. Georgetown Law Journal 85: 1651.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEagly, Alice H., and Shelley Chaiken. 1993. The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth, Texas: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEighth Circuit Gender Fairness Task Force. 1997. Final Report of the Eighth Circuit Gender Fairness Task Force. Creighton Law Review 31: 9 – 182.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllerin, Betty Weinburg, Betty J. Lester, Judith McConnell, Elizabeth A. Porada, Rosalie E. Wahl, and Norma J. Wilker. 1991. Gender Bias in the Courts: The Judge's Role. Women's Rights Law Reporter 12: 239 – 53.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEnoch, Craig. 1994. Incivility in the Legal System? Maybe It's the Rules. Southern Methodist Law Review 47: 199 – 233.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFiske, Susan T. 1993. Controlling Other People: The Impact of Power on Stereotyping. American Psychologist 48: 621 – 28.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFitzgerald, Louise F., Lilia M. Cortina, Kimberly A. Lonsway, Jill Hunter Williams, Regina Day Langhout, Amanda J. Hammond, Vicki J. Magley, Craig R. Waldo, NiCole Buchanan, and Alexandra Ramos. 1997a. Final Report of the Eighth Circuit Gender Fairness Task Force Attorney Survey. Technical report submitted to the Eighth Circuit Gender Fairness Task Force.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFitzgerald, Louise F., Kimberly A. Lonsway, Lilia M. Cortina, Amanda J. Hammond, Regina Day Langhout, Jill Hunter Williams, Vicki J. Magley, and Xiao, Me. 1997b. Final Report of the Eighth Circuit Gender Fairness Task Force Judge Survey. Technical report submitted to the Eighth Circuit Gender Fairness Task Force.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFlannery, J. Harold. 1989. Gender Bias in the Courtroom and Judicial Intervention. Boston Bar Journal, July-August, 21 – 22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrankel, Marvin E. 1975. The Search for Truth: An Umpireal View. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 123: 1031 – 59.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGerber, R. J. 1987. Victory vs. Truth: The Adversary System and Its Ethics. Arizona State Law Journal 19: 3 – 25.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaines, Paul Lowell. 1990. Restraining the Overly Zealous Advocate: Time for Judicial Intervention. Indiana Law Journal 65: 445 – 69.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoneywell, Mark G. 1994. How to Be on the Offensive without Being Offensive. Trial, June, 86 – 88.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJackson, Vicki C. 1997. What Judges Can Learn from Gender Bias Task Force Studies. Judicature 81: 15 – 21, 38 – 39.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJudicial Conference of the United States. 1995. Long Range Plan for the Federal Courts. Washington, D. C.: Committee on Long Range Planning.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaplan, Lawrence W. 1994. When the Court Compounds the Problem: How to Cope with Bias from the Bench. Family Advocate 7: 60 – 63.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLandsman, Maury S. 1997. Bias, Discrimination and Ethics: Constraints on Judges and Lawyers. Presentation at the Eighth Circuit Judicial Conference, Minneapolis.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevine, Jennifer A. 1988. Preventing Gender Bias in the Courts: A Question of Judicial Ethics. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 1: 775 – 95.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Gender Bias Study Committee. 1989, 1990. Report of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Gender Bias Study Committee. Suffolk University Law Review 23: 576; New England Law Review 24: 745.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcMurry, Kelly. 1996. Lawyer Incivility: War Games or Bad Manners ? Trial, October, 10 – 12.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller, Arthur R. 1984. The Adversary System: Dinosaur or Phoenix. Minnesota Law Review 69: 1 – 37.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMinnesota Supreme Court Task Force for Gender in the Courts. 1989. Final Report. William Mitchell Law Review 15: 825 – 948.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMissouri Task Force on Gender and Justice. 1993. Final Report. Missouri Law Review 58: 485 – 716.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNew York Task Force on Women in the Courts. 1987. Final Report. Fordham Urban Law Journal 15: 11 – 198.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNinth Circuit Gender Bias Task Force. 1994. The Effects of Gender in the Federal Courts: The Final Report of the Ninth Circuit Gender Bias Task Force. Southern California Law Review 67: 745 – 1106.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO'Connor, Sandra Day. 1994. The Quality of Justice. Southern California Law Review 67: 759 – 61.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePadavic, Irene, and James D. Orcutt. 1997. Perceptions of Sexual Harassment in the Florida Legal System: A Comparison of Dominance and Spillover Explanations. Gender and Society 11: 682 – 98.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceResnik, Judith. 1982. Managerial Judges. Harvard Law Review 96: 374 – 448.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceResnik, Judith. 1996. Asking about Gender in the Courts. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 20: 952 – 90.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRing, Leonard M. 1993. The Incivility Crisis. Trial, August, 78 – 84.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRound, Deborah Ruble. 1988. Gender Bias in the Judicial System. Southern California Law Review 61: 2193 – 2220.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchafran, Lynn Hecht. 1985. Educating the Judiciary about Gender Bias: The National Judicial Education Program to Promote Equality for Women and Men in the Courts and the New Jersey Supreme Court Task Force on Women in the Courts. Women's Rights Law Reporter 9: 109 – 24.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchafran, Lynn Hecht. 1989. Gender Bias in the Courts: An Emerging Focus for Judicial Reform. Arizona State Law Journal 21: 237 – 73.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchafran, Lynn Hecht. 1990. The Obligation to Intervene: New Direction from the American Bar Association Code of Judicial Conduct. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 4: 53 – 79.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchafran, Lynn Hecht, and Norma J. Wikler. 2001. Gender Fairness in the Courts: Action in the New Millennium. New York: National Judicial Education Program (for the State Justice Institute).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSecond Circuit Task Force on Gender, Racial, and Ethnic Fairness in the Courts. 1997. Report of the Second Circuit Task Force on Gender, Racial, and Ethnic Fairness in the Courts. Annual Survey of American Law 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSeventh Federal Judicial Circuit Committee on Civility. 1992. Final Report of the Committee on Civility of the Seventh Federal Judicial Circuit.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTinkham, T. 1990. Incivility Revisited. Bench and Bar of Minnesota, August, 5.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1747-4469.2002.tb00803.x.pdf
Size:
1.596MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.