Funding Strategies for Emergency Medicine Research
dc.contributor.author | Carden, Donna L. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Dronen, Steven C. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Gehrig, George | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Zalenski, Robert J. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-06-01T18:26:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-06-01T18:26:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1998-02 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Carden, Donna L.; Dronen, Steven C.; Gehrig, George; Zalenski, Robert J. (1998). "Funding Strategies for Emergency Medicine Research." Academic Emergency Medicine 5(2): 168-176. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/71656> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1069-6563 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1553-2712 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/71656 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=9492141&dopt=citation | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The importance of adequate funding for sustaining research efforts cannot be overemphasized. This article addresses funding strategies for emergency physicians, including the necessity of establishing a research track record, developing a well-written grant proposal, and anticipating the grant review process. Funding sources are reviewed with an emphasis on federal institute support and private foundations (including the Emergency Medicine Foundation) in the United States. Sources of current grant support information available from the Internet are provided. Recommendations for enhancing research funding in emergency medicine (EM) are made, including enhancement of formal research training, promotion of EM research and investigators, federal study section membership, and collaboration with established investigators. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 952179 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3109 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd | en_US |
dc.rights | 1998 Society for Academic Emergency Medicine | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Emergency Medicine Research | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Research Funding | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Foundation | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Extramural Support | en_US |
dc.title | Funding Strategies for Emergency Medicine Research | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Medicine (General) | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, Department of Emergency Medicine | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Louisiana Slate University Medical Center, Shreveport, LA, Departments of Emergency Medicine and Internal Medicine | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Louisiana Slate University Medical Center, Shreveport, LA, Department of Orthopedic Surgery | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, Department of Emergency Medicine | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 9492141 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/71656/1/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02605.x.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02605.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Academic Emergency Medicine | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Simons-Morton DG. Funding avenues for research in emergency medicine at the National Institutes of Health and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [commentary]. Acad Emerg Med. 1996; 3: 202 – 4. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Eaves GN, Pike JM, Bernard SC. A successful grant application to the National Institutes of Health:case history. Grants Magazine 1978; 3: 263 – 8. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Adelstein SJ. Preparing a grant proposal. Invest Radiol. 1993; 28: 110 – 2. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Alazraki NP. The Grantsmanship Workshop 1986–1992 and radiology research funding. Invest Radiol. 1993; 28 ( suppl 2 ): S6 – S9. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Gordon SL. Ingredients of a successful grant application to the National Institutes of Health. J Orthop Res. 1989; 7: 138 – 41. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Reif-Lehrer L. Writing a Successful Grant Application. Boston: Jones and Barlett, 1989. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Allen EM. Why are research grant applications disapproved ? Science. 1960; 132: 1532 – 4. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cuca JM. NIH grant applications for clinical research:reasons for poor ratings. Clin Res. 1983; 31: 453 – 61. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cuca JM, McLoughlin WJ. Why clinical research grant applications fare poorly in review and how to recover. Cancer Invest. 1987; 5: 55 – 8. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lewis LM, Callaham ML, Kellermann AL, Marx JA, White JD. Collaboration in emergency medicine research:a consensus statement. Acad Emerg Med. 1998; 5: 152 – 6. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | McKinney WP, Wagner JM, Bunton G, Kirk LM. A Guide to Mosaic and the World Wide Web for physicians. MD Comput 1995; 12: 109 – 141. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Pallen M. The World Wide Web. Br Med J. 1995; 311: 1552 – 6. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Locke LF, Spirduso WW, Silverman SJ. Proposals That Work. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1987, pp. 112 – 15. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lewis RH. Working with industry. Ann Emerg Med. 1996; 27: 414 – 5. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kessler DA. The regulation of investi-gational drugs. N Engl J Med. 1989; 320: 281 – 8. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Paris PM: Relationship between academia and industry:ethical considerations. Ann Emerg Med. 1996; 27: 416 – 7. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kelen GD, Brown CG. The future of emergency medicine research. In: The Role of Emergency Medicine in the Future of American Medical Care:Proceedings of a Conference Chaired by L. PhD. Josiah Macy Jr Foundation, 1995, pp. 173 – 93. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.