View Item 

Show simple item record

A decision theory perspective on why women do or do not decide to have cancer screening: systematic review
dc.contributor.authorAckerson, Kelly Waltersen_US
dc.contributor.authorPreston, Stephanie D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T18:29:43Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T18:29:43Z
dc.date.issued2009-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationAckerson, Kelly; Preston, Stephanie D. (2009). "A decision theory perspective on why women do or do not decide to have cancer screening: systematic review." Journal of Advanced Nursing 65(6): 1130-1140. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/71702>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0309-2402en_US
dc.identifier.issn1365-2648en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/71702
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=19374678&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent105667 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rightsJournal compilation © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.subject.otherAdherenceen_US
dc.subject.otherBreast Cancer Screeningen_US
dc.subject.otherCervical Cancer Screeningen_US
dc.subject.otherDecision Theoryen_US
dc.subject.otherNursingen_US
dc.subject.otherSystematic Reviewen_US
dc.subject.otherWomenen_US
dc.titleA decision theory perspective on why women do or do not decide to have cancer screening: systematic reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNursingen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumKelly Ackerson PhD APRN BC Assistant Professor Bronson School of Nursing, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumStephanie D. Preston PhD Assistant Professor School of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid19374678en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/71702/1/j.1365-2648.2009.04981.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.04981.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Advanced Nursingen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAaker J.L. & Lee A.Y. ( 2001 ) ‘I’ seek pleasures and ‘we’ avoid pains: the role of self-regulatory goals in information processing and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research 28 ( 1 ), 33 – 49.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbood D.A., Black D.R. & Coster D.C. ( 2005 ) Loss-framed minimal intervention increases mammography use. Women’s Health Issues 15 ( 6 ), 258 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAckerson K., Pohl J. & Low L. ( 2008 ) Personal influencing factors associated with Pap smear testing and cervical cancer. Policy, Politics & Nursing Practice 9 ( 1 ), 50 – 60.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdams M.L., Becker H. & Colbert A. ( 2001 ) African-American women’s perceptions of mammography screening. Journal of National Black Nurses Association 12 ( 2 ), 44 – 48.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Cancer Society ( 2007 ) Cancer Prevention & Early Detection Facts & Figures. American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBanks S.M., Salovey P., Greener S., Rothman A.J., Moyer A., Beauvais J., Epel E. ( 1995 ) The effects of message framing on mammography utilization. Health Psychology 14 ( 2 ), 178 – 184.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBehbakht K., Lynch A., Teal S., Degeest K. & Massad S. ( 2004 ) Social and cultural barriers to Papanicolaou test screening in an urban population. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 104 ( 6 ), 1355 – 1361.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlomberg K., Ternestedt B.M., Tornberg S. & Tishelman C. ( 2008 ) How do women who choose not to participate in population-based cervical cancer screening reason about their decision? Psycho-oncology 17 ( 6 ), 561 – 569.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCanales M.K. & Geller B.M. ( 2004 ) Moving in between mammography: screening decisions of American Indian women in Vermont. Sage Publications 14, 836 – 857.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCancer Research UK ( 2002 ) Cervical Cancer Section Overview. Retrieved from http://www.cancerhelp.org.uk/help/default.asp?page=138 on 10 November 2008.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCancer Research UK ( 2007 ) Cervical Cancer. Cervical Screening in the UK. Retrieved from http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/types/cervix/screening/ on 10 November 2008.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarter J., Park E.R., Moadel A., Cleary S.D. & Morgan C. ( 2002 ) Cancer knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and practices (KABP) of disadvantaged women in the South Bronx. Journal of Cancer Education 17 ( 3 ), 142 – 149.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCenters for Disease Control and Prevention ( 2007 ) Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. National Center for Chronic Disease and Prevention and Health Promotion. Atlanta, GA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCenters for Disease Control and Prevention ( 2008 ) Division of Vector-borne Diseases. The West Nile Virus. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvbid/westnile/surv&controlCaseCount08_detailed.htm on 11 August 2008.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChampion V., Maraj M., Hui S., Perkins A.J., Tierney W., Menon U., Skinner C.S. ( 2003 ) Comparison of tailored interventions to increase mammography screening in nonadherent older women. Preventive Medicine 36, 150 – 158.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClarke V.A., Lovegrove H., Williams A. & Machperson M. ( 2000 ) Unrealistic optimism and the health belief model. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 23 ( 4 ), 367 – 376.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavis C., Emerson J.S. & Husaini B.A. ( 2005 ) Breast cancer screening among African American women: adherence to current recommendations. Journal of Healthcare for the Poor and Underserved 16 ( 2 ), 308 – 314.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDawes R. ( 1998 ) Behavioral decision making and judgment. In The Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 1 ( Gilbert D.T., Riske S.T. & Lindzey G., eds ), Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 497 – 548.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavey C., White V., Gattellari M. & Ward J.E. ( 2005 ) Reconciling population benefits and women’s individual autonomy in mammographic screening: In-depth interviews to explore women’s views about ‘informed choice’. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 29 ( 1 ), 69 – 77.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDenberg T.D., Wong S. & Beattie A. ( 2005 ) Women’s misconceptions about cancer screening: implications for informed decision-making. Patient Education and Counseling 57, 280 – 285.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEdwards A., Elwyn G., Covey J., Matthews E. & Pill R. ( 2001 ) Presenting risk information – a review of the effects of ‘framing’ and other manipulations on patient outcomes. Journal of Health Communication 6, 61E82.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEiser J.R. & Cole N. ( 2002 ) Participation in cervical screening as a function of perceived risk, barriers, and need for cognitive closure. Journal of Health Psychology 7 ( 1 ), 99 – 105.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFinney L.J. & Iannotti R.J. ( 2002 ) Message framing and mammography screening: a theory-driven intervention. Behavioral Medicine 28 ( 1 ), 5 – 14.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceForbes C., Jepson R. & Martin-Hirsch P. ( 2002 ) Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 3. Art. No.: CD002834. DOI :.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFowler B.A. ( 2006 ) Claiming health: mammography screening decision making of African American women. Oncology Nursing Forum 33 ( 5 ), 969 – 982.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJennings K.M. ( 1997 ) Getting a pap smear: focus group responses of African American and Latina women. Oncology Nursing Forum 24 ( 5 ), 827 – 835.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJepson R., Clegg A., Forbes C., Lewis R., Sowden A. & Kleijnen J. ( 2000 ) The determinants of screening uptake and interventions for increasing uptake: a systematic review. Health Technology Assessment 4 ( 14 ), i – vii, 1–133.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKahneman D. & Tversky A. ( 1979 ) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47 ( 2 ), 263 – 292.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLerner J.S. & Keltner D. ( 2000 ) Beyond valence: toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgment and choice. Cognition & Emotion 14 ( 4 ), 473 – 493.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLerner J.S. & Keltner D. ( 2001 ) Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 ( 1 ), 146 – 159.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNabi R.L. ( 2002 ) Anger, fear, uncertainty, and attitudes: a test of the cognitive-functional model. Communication Monographs 69 ( 3 ), 204 – 216.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Cancer Institute ( 2007 ) Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results. SEER cancer statistics. Retrieved from http://seer.cancer.gov/ on 10 June 2007.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNelson K., Geiger A.M. & Mangione C.M. ( 2002 ) Effect of health beliefs on delays in care for abnormal cervical cytology in a multi-ethnic population. Journal of General Internal Medicine 17 ( 9 ), 709 – 716.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencevon Neumann J. & Morgenstern O. ( 1944 ) Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 1953 edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePatton M.Q. ( 2002 ) Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePhillips J.M., Cohen M.Z. & Moses G. ( 1999 ) Breast cancer screening and African American women: fear, fatalism, and silence. Oncology Nursing Forum 26 ( 3 ), 561 – 571.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRauscher G.H., Hawley S.T. & Earp J.L. ( 2005 ) Baseline predictors of initiation vs. maintenance of regular mammo-graphy use among rural women. Preventive Medicine 40, 822 – 830.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRimal R.N. & Real K. ( 2003 ) Perceived risk and efficacy beliefs as motivators of change. Use of the risk perception attitude (RPA) framework to understand health behaviors. Human Communication Research 29 ( 3 ), 370 – 399.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaidi G., Sutton S. & Bickler G. ( 1998 ) A predictive study of reasons for attendance and non-attendance at a breast screening programme. Psychology and Health 13, 23 – 33.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSarfati D., Howden-Chapman P., Woodward A. & Salmond C. ( 1998 ) Does the frame affect the picture? A study into how attitudes to screening for cancer are affected by the way benefits are expressed Journal of Medical Screening 5 ( 3 ), 137 – 140.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchneider T.R., Salovey P., Apanovitch A.M., Pizarro J., McCarthy D. & Zullo J. ( 2001 ) The effects of message framing and ethnic targeting on mammography use among low-income women. Health Psychology 20 ( 4 ), 256 – 266.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSlovic P. ( 1987 ) Perception of risk. Science 236, 280 – 285.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTessaro I., Eng E. & Smith J. ( 1994 ) Breast cancer screening in older African-American women: qualitative research findings. American Journal of Health Promotion 8 ( 4 ), 286 – 292.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThomas V.N., Saleem T. & Abraham R. ( 2005 ) Barriers to effective uptake of cancer screening among black and minority ethnic groups. International Journal of Palliative Nursing 11 ( 11 ), 562 – 571.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTimmins F. & McCabe C. ( 2005 ) How to conduct an effective literature search. Nursing Standard 20 ( 11 ), 41 – 47.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTversky A. & Kahneman D. ( 1981 ) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211, 453 – 458.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVehab M. & Gastaldo D. ( 2003 ) Rational choice(s)? Rethinking decision-making on breast cancer risk and screening mammography. Nursing Inquiry 10 ( 4 ), 245 – 256.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeinstein N.D. ( 1982 ) Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 5 ( 4 ), 441 – 460.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeinstein N.D. ( 1987 ) Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems: conclusions from a community-wide sample. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 10 ( 5 ), 481 – 500.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhynes D.K., Philips Z. & Avis M. ( 2007 ) Why do women participate in the English cervical cancer screening program? Journal of Health Economics 26, 306 – 325.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWorld Health Organization ( 2008 ) Epidemic and pandemic alert and response (EPR). Retrieved from http://www.who.int/csr/disease/avian_influenza/country/cases_table_2008_06_19/en/index.html on 1 August 2008.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYoung R.F., Waller J.B. & Smitherman H. ( 2002 ) A breast cancer education and on-site screening intervention for unscreened African American women. Journal of Cancer Education 17 ( 4 ), 231 – 236.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1365-2648.2009.04981.x.pdf
Size:
103.1KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.