Show simple item record

Forehead Donor Site Full-Thickness Skin Graft

dc.contributor.authorDimitropoulos, Vassiliosen_US
dc.contributor.authorBichakjian, Christopher K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Timothy M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T18:37:03Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T18:37:03Z
dc.date.issued2005-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationDimitropoulos, Vassilios; Bichakjian, Christopher K.; Johnson, Timothy M. (2005). "Forehead Donor Site Full-Thickness Skin Graft." Dermatologic Surgery 31(3): 324-326. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/71819>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1076-0512en_US
dc.identifier.issn1524-4725en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/71819
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=15841635&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractFull-thickness skin grafts (FTSGs) are useful for reconstructing nasal defects. Traditional reported donor sites include the preauricular, postauricular, supraclavicular, clavicular, conchal bowl, melolabial fold, and upper eyelid skin. Selection of the “best” donor site is based on the “best” tissue match and ability to camouflage the donor scar. Objective The purpose was to report our experience with FTSGs harvested from the forehead for reconstruction of nasal defects following Mohs' surgery. Methods A retrospective query of the Mohs' surgery database was performed to identify nasal defects repaired with a FTSG harvested from the forehead skin. The research record contained the patient age and gender, defect size, and cosmetic and functional outcomes interpreted by the patient and surgeon. Results FTSGs from forehead skin were used to repair the nasal defects in three patients. The functional and cosmetic outcome of all three cases was deemed excellent by the patient and surgeon. Donor site scars were well concealed within preexisting rhytids. Conclusion FTSGs harvested from the forehead, although limited in practical utility, may offer an optimal FTSG match for limited select defects while also providing an easily camouflaged donor site scar within a forehead rhytid. VASSILIOS DIMITROPOULOS, MD, CHRISTOPHER K. BICHAKJIAN, MD, AND TIMOTHY M. JOHNSON, MD, HAVE INDICATED NO SIGNIFICANT INTEREST WITH COMMERCIAL SUPPORTERS.en_US
dc.format.extent368890 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights2005 by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery, Inc.en_US
dc.titleForehead Donor Site Full-Thickness Skin Graften_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDermatologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationum* Department of Dermatology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationum† Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationum† Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.identifier.pmid15841635en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/71819/1/j.1524-4725.2005.31082.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1524-4725.2005.31082en_US
dc.identifier.sourceDermatologic Surgeryen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson TM, Ratner D, Nelson BR Soft tissue reconstruction with skin grafting. J Am Acad Dermatol 1992; 27: 151 – 65. 1430351en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRobinson JK, Dillig G The advantages of delayed nasal full-thickness skin grafting after Mohs micrographic surgery. Dermatol Surg 2002; 28: 845 – 51. 12269881en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRobinson JK Segmental reconstruction of the face. Dermatol Surg 2004; 30: 67 – 74. 14692931en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson TM, Swanson N, Baker SR Concepts of sliding and lifting tissue movement in flap reconstruction. Dermatol Surg 2000; 26: 274 – 8. 10759809en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLove CW, Collison DW, Carithers JS, Ceilley RI Perichondrial cutaneous grafts for reconstruction of skin cancer excision defects. Dermatol Surg 1995; 21: 219 – 22. 7712089en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRohrer TE, Dzubow LM Conchal bowl skin grafting in nasal tip reconstruction: clinical and histologic evaluation. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995; 33: 476 – 81. 7657871en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMatheson BK, Mellette JR Jr. Surgical pearl: clavicular grafts are “superior” to supraclavicular grafts J Am Acad Dermatol 1997; 37: 991 – 3. 9418770en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyd CM, Baker SR, Fader DJ et al. The forehead flap for nasal reconstruction. Arch Dermatol 2000; 136: 1365 – 70. 11074699en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGniadecka M, Jemec GB Quantitative evaluation of chronological ageing and photoageing in vivo: studies on skin echogenicity and thickness. Br J Dermatol 1998; 139: 815 – 21. 9892947en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSeidenari S, Giusti G, Bertoni L et al. Thickness and echogenicity of the skin in children as assessed by 20-MHz ultrasound. Dermatology 2000; 201: 218 – 22. 11096192en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDahan S, Lagarde JM, Turlier V et al. Treatment of neck lines and forehead rhytids with a nonablative 1540-nm Er:glass laser: a controlled clinical study combined with the measurement of the thickness and the mechanical properties of the skin. Dermatol Surg 2004; 30: 872 – 9. 15171765en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGunga HC, Kirsch K, Baartz F et al. Fluid distribution and tissue thickness changes in 29 men during 1 week at moderate altitude (2,315 m). Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1995; 70: 1 – 5. 7729432en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.