Show simple item record

The reliability of a hypothesis generation and testing task

dc.contributor.authorDonnelly, Michael B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSisson, James C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWoolliscroft, James O.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T18:41:20Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T18:41:20Z
dc.date.issued1990-11en_US
dc.identifier.citationDONNELLY, M. B.; SISSON, J. C.; WOOLLISCROFT, J. O. (1990). "The reliability of a hypothesis generation and testing task." Medical Education 24(6): 507-511. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/71888>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0308-0110en_US
dc.identifier.issn1365-2923en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/71888
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=2266887&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this paper is to present results of initial experience with a clinical reasoning task which assesses two clearly defined aspects of clinical problem solving. Fourteen senior and 40 junior medical students at the University of Michigan Medical School participated in this study. They were given three clinical reasoning problems — the hypothesis generation and testing tasks (HG&T). As suggested by the name, two specifically defined components of clinical problem-solving, developing the initial hypotheses or differential and then testing hypotheses, were evaluated by these tasks. The findings of this study indicate that hypothesis generation and testing can be reliably evaluated with between seven and ten tasks. The results of this study suggest that reliable assessments of specific components of clinical problem-solving can be developed.en_US
dc.format.extent370355 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights1990 Blackwell Publishingen_US
dc.subject.other*Clinical Competenceen_US
dc.subject.other*Problem Solvingen_US
dc.subject.otherEducation, Medical Undergraduate/*Methodsen_US
dc.subject.otherMichiganen_US
dc.titleThe reliability of a hypothesis generation and testing tasken_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducationen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Postgraduate Medicine and Health Professions Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationum† Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.identifier.pmid2266887en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/71888/1/j.1365-2923.1990.tb02666.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2923.1990.tb02666.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceMedical Educationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerner E. ( 1984 ) Paradigms and problem solving: a literature review. Journal of Medical Education 59, 625 – 33.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDonnelly M., Fleisher D., Schwenker J. & Chen C ( 1982 ) Problem solving within a limited content area. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education, pp. 51 – 6. Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElstein A., Shulman L. & Sprafka S. ( 1978 ) Medical Problem Solving: An Analysis of Clinical Reasoning. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeightner J. & Norman G ( 1978 ) Computer-based problems as a measure of the problem solving process. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of Research in Medical Education, pp. 51 – 6. Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFitzpatrick R. & Morrison E ( 1971 ) Performance and product evaluation In: Educational Measurement ( ed. by R. Thorndike ), pp. 237 – 70. American Council on Education, Washington, DC.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHamm R. ( 1988 ) Clinical intuition and clinical analysis: expertise and the cognitive continuum. In: Professional Judgment ( ed. by J. Dowie & A. Elstein ), pp. 78 – 105. Cambridge University press, Cambridge.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarless W., Drennon G., Marxer J., Root J. & Miller G. ( 1971 ) CASE: a computer-assisted simulation of the clinical encounter. Journal of Medical Education 46, 443 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcGuire C. & Babbott D. ( 1967 ) Simulation technique in the measurement of problem solving skills. Journal of Educational Measurement 4, 1 – 10.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcGuire C. ( 1985 ) Medical problem-solving: a critique of the literature. Journal of Medical Education 60, 587 – 95.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNorman G. & Tugwell P. ( 1982 ) A comparison of resident performance on real and simulated patients. Journal of Medical Education 57, 708 – 15.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStillman P. et al. ( 1986 ) Assessing clinical skills of residents with standardized patients. Annals of Internal Medicine 105, 762 – 71.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwanson D., Norcini J. & Grosso L. ( 1987 ) Assessment of clinical competence: written and computer-based simulations. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 12, 220 – 46.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.