Show simple item record

Optimization of Maxillary Obturator Thickness Using a Double-Processing Technique

dc.contributor.authorOh, Won-sucken_US
dc.contributor.authorRoumanas, Eleni D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T18:43:57Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T18:43:57Z
dc.date.issued2008-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationOh, Won-suck; Roumanas, Eleni D. (2008). "Optimization of Maxillary Obturator Thickness Using a Double-Processing Technique." Journal of Prosthodontics 17(1): 60-63. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/71930>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1059-941Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1532-849Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/71930
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=17931364&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractPreservation of remaining structures is a primary goal of prosthetic rehabilitation. Continuously applied stresses on the remaining tissues from a large, heavy obturator jeopardize the health of the tissues, compromise the function of the prosthesis, and affect patient comfort. Various techniques have been described for hollowing the bulb of an obturator after processing to reduce its weight; however, access to the inner aspects of the bulb is limited, preventing adequate control of thickness of the walls. This article describes a double-processing technique for an obturator to optimize the weight and thickness of the bulb.en_US
dc.format.extent169912 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.rights2007 by The American College of Prosthodontistsen_US
dc.subject.otherProsthetic Rehabilitationen_US
dc.subject.otherObturator Prosthesisen_US
dc.subject.otherDouble-processing Techniqueen_US
dc.titleOptimization of Maxillary Obturator Thickness Using a Double-Processing Techniqueen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumAssociate Clinical Professor, Division of Prosthodontics, Department of Biologic & Materials Sciences, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherProfessor, Division of Advanced Prosthodontics, Biomaterials and Hospital Dentistry, and Director, Graduate Prosthodontics, The Jane and Jerry Weintraub Center for Reconstructive Biotechnology, UCLA School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid17931364en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/71930/1/j.1532-849X.2007.00249.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00249.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Prosthodonticsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeVan MM: The concept of neutrocentric occlusion as related to denture stability. J Am Dent Assoc 1954; 48: 165 - 169en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVlissidis D, Paipetis SA: The mechanical strength of maxillary complete dentures. J Biomed Mater Res 1984; 18: 413 - 425en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLanger A: The validity of maxillomandibular records made with trial and processed acrylic resin bases. J Prosthet Dent 1981; 45: 253 - 258en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJacob RF, Yen TW: Processed record bases for the edentulous maxillofacial patient. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65: 680 - 685en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpiro RH, Strong EW, Shah JP: Maxillectomy and its classification. Head Neck 1997; 19: 309 - 314en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeumer J, Curtis TA, Marunick MT: Maxillofacial Rehabilitation Prosthodontic and Surgical Considerations, 2nd edition. St. Louis, MO, Ishiyaku Euroamerica Inc, 1996, pp. 225 - 247en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUmino S, Masuda G, Ono S, et al: Speech intelligibility following maxillectomy with and without a prosthesis: An analysis of 54 cases. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25: 153 - 158en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRieger J, Wolfaardt J, Seikaly H, et al: Speech outcomes in patients rehabilitated with maxillary obturator prostheses after maxillectomy: A prospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15: 139 - 144en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSullivan M, Gaebler C, Beukelman D, et al: Impact of palatal prosthodontic intervention on communication performance of patients' maxillectomy defects: A multilevel outcome study. Head Neck 2002; 24: 530 - 538en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown KE: Peripheral consideration in improving obturator retention. J Prosthet Dent 1968; 20: 176 - 181en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwartzman B, Caputo A, Beumer J: Occlusal force transfer by removable partial denture designs for a radical maxillectomy. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 54: 397 - 403en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwartzman B, Caputo AA, Beumer J: Gravity-induced stresses by an obturator prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 64: 466 - 468en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMinsley GE, Nelson DR, Rothenberger SL: An alternative method for fabrication of a closed hollow obturator. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 55: 485 - 490en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWu YL, Schaaf NG: Comparison of weight reduction in different designs of solid and hollow obturator prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62: 214 - 217en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChalian VA, Barnett MO: A new technique for constructing a one-piece hollow obturator after partial maxillectomy. J Prosthet Dent 1972; 28: 448 - 453en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKnapp JG: A simplified approach to the fabrication of a maxillary hollow obturator prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 51: 67 - 69en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJhanji A, Stevens ST: Fabrication of one-piece hollow obturators. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 66: 136 - 138en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOh W, Roumanas E: Alternate technique for fabrication of a custom impression tray for definitive obturator construction. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 95: 473 - 475en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMurata H, Hamada T, Nagasiri R: Stabilizing record bases for edentulous obturator prostheses with silicone resilient relining material. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 366 - 368.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGraser GN: Completed bases for removable dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1978; 39: 232 - 236en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.