View Item 

Show simple item record

Synthesizing Related Rules from Statutes and Cases for Legal Expert Systems

dc.contributor.authorAllen, Layman E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPayton, Sallyanneen_US
dc.contributor.authorSaxon, Charles S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T18:48:03Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T18:48:03Z
dc.date.issued1990-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationALLEN, LAYMAN E.; PAYTON, SALLYANNE; SAXON, CHARLES S. (1990). "Synthesizing Related Rules from Statutes and Cases for Legal Expert Systems." Ratio Juris 3(2): 272-318. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/71996>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0952-1917en_US
dc.identifier.issn1467-9337en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/71996
dc.description.abstractDifferent legal expert systems may be incompatible with each other: A user in characterizing the same situation by answering the questions presented in a consultation can be led to contradictory inferences. Such systems can be “synthesized” to help users avoid such contradictions by alerting them that other relevant systems are available to be consulted as they are responding to questions. An example of potentially incompatible, related legal expert systems is presented here - ones for the New Jersey murder statute and the celebrated Quinlan case, along with one way of synthesizing them to avoid such incompatibility.en_US
dc.format.extent2630210 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights1990 Blackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.titleSynthesizing Related Rules from Statutes and Cases for Legal Expert Systemsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelLaw and Legal Studiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelGovernment, Politics and Lawen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Ann Arbor Mi 48109–1215 USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumEastern Michigan University Ypsilanti Mi 48197 USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/71996/1/j.1467-9337.1990.tb00063.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1467-9337.1990.tb00063.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceRatio Jurisen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllen, Layman E., and Charles S. Saxon 1985. Computer Aided Normalizing and Unpacking: Some Interesting Machine-Processable Transformations of Legal Rules. In Computer Power and Legal Reasoning. Ed. Charles Walter, 495 – 572. St. Paul: West Publishing Company.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllen, Layman E., and Charles S. Saxon 1988a. Automatic Generation of a Legal Expert System of Model Penal Code Section 213, l - Rape and Related Offences. ( Paper presented at the 17th American Society for Information Science Mid-year Meeting, May 15–18, 1988, Ann Arbor, Mi, U.S.A. ).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllen, Layman E., and Charles S. Saxon 1988b. Automatic Generation of a Legal Expert System of Section 7(2) of the United Kingdom Data Protection Act 1084. Theoria 7–9: 269 – 315.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllen, Layman E., and Charles S. Saxon 1988c. Automatic Generation of a Legal Expert System of Article 123 of the Inheritance Act of Serbia. ( Paper presented at the 10th International Symposium on “Computers at the University”, June 6–10, 1988, Dubrovnik/Cavtat, Yugoslavia. ).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllen, Layman E., and Charles S. Saxon 1988d. Multiple Interpretations of the Logical Structure of Legal Rules: Impediment or Boon to Legal Expert Systems. ( Paper presented at the 5th International Symposium on “Logic Programming,” August 15–19, 1988, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A. ).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllen, Layman E., and Radovan, Stipanovic. 1988. Automatic Generation of a Legal Expert System of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development's Guidelines 9 and 10 on the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data. ( Paper presented at the loth International Symposium on “Computers at the University,” June 6–10, 1988, Dubrovnik/Cavtat, Yugoslavia. ).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSusskind, Richard E. 1987. Expert Systems in Law. Oxford: Clarendon.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1467-9337.1990.tb00063.x.pdf
Size:
2.508MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.