Show simple item record

Information technology innovation diffusion: an information requirements paradigm

dc.contributor.authorMelville, Nigel P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRamirez, Ronalden_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T19:00:49Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T19:00:49Z
dc.date.issued2008-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationMelville, Nigel; Ramirez, Ronald (2008). "Information technology innovation diffusion: an information requirements paradigm." Information Systems Journal 18(3): 247-273. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72203>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1350-1917en_US
dc.identifier.issn1365-2575en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72203
dc.description.abstractInformation technology (IT) innovation research examines the organizational and technological factors that determine IT adoption and diffusion, including firm size and scope, technological competency and expected benefits. We extend the literature by focusing on information requirements as a driver of IT innovation adoption and diffusion. Our framework of IT innovation diffusion incorporates three industry-level sources of information requirements: process complexity, clock speed and supply chain complexity. We apply the framework to US manufacturing industries using aggregate data of internet-based innovations and qualitative analysis of two industries: wood products and beverage manufacturing. Results show systematic patterns supporting the basic thesis of the information processing paradigm: higher IT innovation diffusion in industries with higher information processing requirements; the salience of downstream industry structure in the adoption of interorganizational systems; and the role of the location of information intensity in the supply chain in determining IT adoption and diffusion. Our study provides a new explanation for why certain industries were early and deep adopters of internet-based innovations while others were not: variation in information processing requirements.en_US
dc.format.extent203611 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rightsJournal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.subject.otherAdoptionen_US
dc.subject.otherDiffusionen_US
dc.subject.otherInformation Processing Viewen_US
dc.subject.otherInnovationen_US
dc.titleInformation technology innovation diffusion: an information requirements paradigmen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelComputer Scienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationum* Stephen M. Ross School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1234, USA, email: npmelv@umich.edu , anden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherBusiness School, University of Colorado at Denver, PO Box 173364, Campus Box 165, Denver, CO 80217-3364, USA, email: ronald.ramirez@cudenver.eduen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/72203/1/j.1365-2575.2007.00260.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00260.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceInformation Systems Journalen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAghion, P., Blundell, R., Griffith, R. & Howitt, P. ( 2005 ) Competition and innovation: an inverted-u relationship. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 701 – 728.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnandarajan, M. & Arinze, B. ( 1998 ) Matching client/server processing architectures with information processing requirements: a contingency study. Information and Management, 34, 265 – 274.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAraman, P., Schmoldt, D., Cho, T.-H., Zhu, D., Conners, R. & Kline, D. ( 1992 ) Machine vision systems for processing hardwood lumber and logs. AI Applications, 6, 13 – 26.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBacheldor, B. ( 2000 ) IT: always in good taste. Information Week, 803, 237 – 242.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBain, J. ( 1951 ) Relation of profit rate to industry concentration: American manufacturing, 1936–1940. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 65, 293 – 324.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBensaou, M. & Venkatraman, N. ( 1995 ) Configurations of interorganizational relationships: a comparison between U.S. and Japanese automakers. Management Science, 41, 1471 – 1492.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBowe, S., Smith, R., Kline, D. & Araman, P. ( 2002 ) A segmental analysis of current and future scanning and optimizing technology in the hardwood sawmill industry. Forest Products Journal, 52, 68 – 76.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrancheau, J.C. & Wetherbe, J.C. ( 1990 ) The adoption of spreadsheet software: testing innovation diffusion theory in the context of end-user computing. Information Systems Research, 1, 115 – 143.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCagliano, R., Caniato, F. & Spina, G. ( 2003 ) E-business strategy. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 23, 1142 – 1162.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen, M. ( 2005 ) Technology adoption in response to changes in market conditions: evidence from the US petroleum refining industry. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14, 735 – 756.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChiasson, M. & Davidson, E. ( 2005 ) Taking industry seriously in information systems research. Information Systems Research, 29, 591 – 606.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCho, V. ( 2006 ) Factors in the adoption of third-party B2B portals in the textile industry. Journal of Computing Information Systems, 46, 18 – 31.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChwelos, P., Benbasat, I. & Dexter, A.S. ( 2001 ) Research report: empirical test of an EDI adoption model. Information Systems Research, 12, 304 – 321.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCioletti, J. ( 2003a ) And now for something completely different. Beverage World, 122, 49 – 50.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCioletti, J. ( 2003b ) The paperless route. Beverage World, 122, 82.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCooper, R.B. & Zmud, R.W. ( 1992 ) Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach. Management Science, 36, 123 – 139.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrowston, K. & Myers, M.D. ( 2004 ) Information technology and the transformation of industries: three research perspectives. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 13, 5 – 28.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCumbo, D., Smith, R. & Araman, P. ( 2003 ) Low-grade hardwood lumber production, markets, and issues. Forest Products Journal, 53, 17 – 24.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDriedonks, C., Gregor, S., Wassenaar, A. & van Heck, E. ( 2005 ) Economic and social analysis of the adoption of B2B electronic marketplaces: a case study in the Australian beef industry. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 9, 49 – 72.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElliott, C. ( 1998 ) A loaf of bread, a jug of wine, a notebook computer. Journal of Business Strategy, 19, 34 – 38.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEsper, T. & Williams, L. ( 2003 ) The value of collaborative transportation management (CTM): its relationship to CPFR and information technology. Transportation Journal, 42, 55 – 65.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFichman, R.G. ( 2004 ) Going beyond the dominant paradigm for information technology innovation research: emerging concepts and methods. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 5, 314 – 355.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFine, C. ( 1998 ) Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control in the Age of Temporary Advantage. Perseus Books, Reading, MA, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFine, C.H. ( 2000 ) The clockspeed chronicles. Supply Chain Management Review, 4, 60 – 64.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFoley, J. & Kontzer, T. ( 2004 ) Coca-Cola plans to refresh its supply chain. Information Week, 976, 22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFolwell, R. & Volanti, M. ( 2003 ) The changing market structure of the USA wine industry. Journal of Wine Research, 14, 25 – 30.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceForza, C., Romano, P. & Vinelli, A. ( 2000 ) Information technology for managing the textile apparel chain: current use, shortcomings and development directions. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 3, 227 – 243.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFowler, S., Novack, A.-M. & Stillings, M. ( 2000 ) The evolution of a manufacturing web site. Computer Networks, 33, 365 – 376.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFryer, B. ( 1998 ) Enterprise apps: best investment? Information Week, 700, 159 – 162.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalbraith, J.R. ( 1977 ) Organization Design. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHayes, M. ( 2001 ) IT moves to the front burner. Information Week, 855, 133 – 135.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHemphill, G.A. ( 2004 ) US Soft Drink Sales Flat in 2003. Beverage Marketing Corporation Report, New York, 4 March.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHemphill, G.A. ( 2005 ) US Beer Market Struggles to Grow in 2004. Beverage Marketing Corporation Report, New York, 17 May.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHiggins, K. ( 2002 ) Double duty inspection tools. Food Engineering, 74, 61 – 65.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHiggins, K. ( 2003a ) The state of food manufacturing. Food Engineering, 75, 50 – 56.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHiggins, K. ( 2003b ) Better products through better control. Food Engineering, 75, 37 – 39.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJarvis, C., Mackenzie, S. & Podsakoff, P. ( 2003 ) A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 199 – 218.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson, M.E. & Whang, S. ( 2002 ) E-business and supply chain management: an overview and framework. Production and Operations Management, 11, 413 – 423.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKarimi, J., Somers, T.M. & Gupta, Y. ( 2004 ) Impact of environmental uncertainty and task characteristics on user satisfaction with data. Information Systems Research, 15, 175 – 193.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKing, J., Gurbaxani, V., Kraemer, K., McFarlan, F., Raman, K. & Yap, C. ( 1994 ) Institutional factors in information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 5, 139 – 169.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKoppel, N. ( 2004 ) Panel upholds US tariffs on Canadian lumber. Portland Press Herald.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKoss, P. ( 2003 ) IT concepts in beverage operations. Beverage World, 122, 61.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKourtis, L. & Arvanitoyannis, I. ( 2001 ) Implementation of hazard analysis critical control point (HACCP) system to the alcohol beverages industry. Food Reviews International, 17, 1 – 44.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKraemer, K. & Dedrick, J. ( 2002 ) Strategic use of the internet and e-commerce: Cisco Systems. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11, 5 – 29.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKraemer, K., Dedrick, J. & Yamashiro, S. ( 2000 ) Refining and extending the business model with information technology: Dell Computer Corporation. The Information Society, 16, 5 – 21.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrell, E. ( 2004 ) Enabling technology to enable. Review, 21, 28 – 31.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLoh, L. & Venkatraman, N. ( 1992 ) Diffusion of information technology outsourcing: influence sources and the Kodak effect. Information Systems Research, 3, 334 – 358.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLyytinen, K. & Rose, G. ( 2003 ) Disruptive information system innovation: the case of internet computing. Information Systems Journal, 13, 301 – 330.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacher, J., Mowery, D. & Simcoe, T. ( 2002 ) e-Business and disintegration of the semiconductor industry value chain. Industry and Innovation, 9, 155 – 181.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarch, J. & Simon, H. ( 1958 ) Organizations. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMendelson, H. & Pillai, R.R. ( 1998 ) Clockspeed and informational response: evidence from the information technology industry. Information Systems Research, 9, 415 – 433.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMendelson, H. & Pillai, R.R. ( 1999 ) Industry clockspeed: measurement and operational implications. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 1, 1 – 20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoozakis, C. ( 2001 ) Coors looks for a silver bullet. Internet Week, 870, 14 – 15.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMustonen-Ollila, E. & Lyytinen, K. ( 2003 ) Why organizations adopt information system process innovations: a longitudinal study using Diffusion of Innovation theory. Information Systems Journal, 13, 275 – 297.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePhan, D.D. ( 2003 ) E-business development for competitive advantages: a case study. Information and Management, 40, 581 – 590.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrasad, B. ( 1998 ) Designing products for variety and how to manage complexity. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 7, 208 – 222.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRogers, E.M. ( 1983 ) Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York, NY, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwanson, E.B. ( 1994 ) Information systems innovation among organizations. Management Science, 40, 1069 – 1092.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwanson, L. ( 2003 ) An information-processing model of maintenance management. International Journal of Production Economics, 83, 45 – 64.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTehan, R. ( 2003 ) E-Commerce Statistics: Explanation and Sources, RL31293, pp. 1–12. Congressional Research Service Documents, Information Research Division, The Library of Congress, Washington, DC, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTeng, S. & Jaramillo, H. ( 2005 ) A model for evaluation and selection of suppliers in global textile and apparel supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 35, 503 – 523.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTornatzky, L.G. & Fleischer, M. ( 1990 ) The Process of Technology Innovation. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTushman, M.L. & Nadler, D.A. ( 1978 ) Information processing as an integrating concept in organizationaldesign. Academy of Management Review, 3, 613 – 624.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan de Ven, A.H. & Ferry, D.L. ( 1980 ) Measuring and Assessing Organizations. Wiley, New York, NY, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceViolino, B. ( 1999 ) Extended enterprise. Information Week, 726, 46 – 53.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVlosky, R. & Smith, T. ( 2003 ) eBusiness in the U.S. hardwood lumber industry. Forest Products Journal, 53, 21 – 29.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVlosky, R. & Westbrook, T. ( 2002 ) E-business exchange between home buyers and wood products suppliers. Forest Products Journal, 52, 38 – 43.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVlosky, R., Westbrook, T. & Poku, K. ( 2002 ) An exploratory study of internet adoption by primary wood products manufacturers in the western United States. Forest Products Journal, 52, 35 – 42.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang, E.T. ( 2003 ) Effect of fit between information processing requirements and capacity on organizational performance. International Journal of Information Management, 23, 239 – 247.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWigand, R., Steinfeld, C. & Markus, M.L. ( 2005 ) Information technology standards choices and industry structure outcomes: the case of the U.S. home mortgage industry. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22, 165 – 191.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWine Business Monthly ( 2004 ) The top 30 U.S. wine companies. [WWW document.] URL http://winebusiness.com/specialsection/Top30USWineCompanies.cfm (last accessed 21 May 2004).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWoodward, J. ( 1994 ) Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press, London, UK.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZhu, K., Kraemer, K.L., Xu, S. & Dedrick, J. ( 2004 ) Information technology payoff in e-business environments: an international perspective on value creation of e-business in the financial services industry. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21, 17 – 54.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZmud, R. & Apple, L.E. ( 1992 ) Measuring technology incorporation/infusion. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9, 148 – 155.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.