Show simple item record

Is Language a Barrier to the Use of Preventive Services?

dc.contributor.authorWoloshin, Stevenen_US
dc.contributor.authorSchwartz, Lisa M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKatz, Steven J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWelch, H. Gilberten_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T19:01:11Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T19:01:11Z
dc.date.issued1997-08en_US
dc.identifier.citationWoloshin, Steven; Schwartz, Lisa M . ; Katz, Steven J . ; Welch, H. Gilbert (1997). "Is Language a Barrier to the Use of Preventive Services?." Journal of General Internal Medicine 12(8): 472-477. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72209>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0884-8734en_US
dc.identifier.issn1525-1497en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72209
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=9276652&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractTo isolate the effect of spoken language from financial barriers to care, we examined the relation of language to use of preventive services in a system with universal access. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Household population of women living in Ontario, Canada, in 1990. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects were 22,448 women completing the 1990 Ontario Health Survey, a population-based random sample of households. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We defined language as the language spoken in the home and assessed self-reported receipt of breast examination, mammogram and Pap testing. We used logistic regression to calculate odds ratios for each service adjusting for potential sources of confounding: socioeconomic characteristics, contact with the health care system, and measures reflecting culture. Ten percent of the women spoke a non-English language at home (4% French, 6% other). After adjustment, compared with English speakers, French-speaking women were significantly less likely to receive breast exams or mammography, and other language speakers were less likely to receive Pap testing. CONCLUSIONS: Women whose main spoken language was not English were less likely to receive important preventive services. Improving communication with patients with limited English may enhance participation in screening programs. KEY WORDS: language; preventive health services; accessibility of health services; communication barriers.en_US
dc.format.extent354055 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Science, Inc.en_US
dc.rights1997 by the Society of General Internal Medicineen_US
dc.titleIs Language a Barrier to the Use of Preventive Services?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arboren_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherVA Outcomes Group, White River Junction, Vt.,en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartments of Medicine and Health Management and Policy and the Consortium for Health Outcomes, Innovation and Cost-Effectiveness Studies,en_US
dc.identifier.pmid9276652en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/72209/1/j.1525-1497.1997.00085.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.00085.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of General Internal Medicineen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.