View Item 

Show simple item record

Disentangling the effects of historic vs. contemporary landscape structure on population genetic divergence
dc.contributor.authorZellmer, Amanda Juneen_US
dc.contributor.authorKnowles, L. Laceyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T19:02:33Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T19:02:33Z
dc.date.issued2009-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationZELLMER, A. J.; KNOWLES, L. L. (2009). "Disentangling the effects of historic vs. contemporary landscape structure on population genetic divergence." Molecular Ecology 18(17): 3593-3602. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72231>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0962-1083en_US
dc.identifier.issn1365-294Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72231
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=19674302&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent312322 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights© 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.subject.otherConservation Geneticsen_US
dc.subject.otherHabitat Fragmentationen_US
dc.subject.otherMetapopulation Dynamicsen_US
dc.subject.otherRana Sylvaticaen_US
dc.subject.otherRapid Differentiationen_US
dc.titleDisentangling the effects of historic vs. contemporary landscape structure on population genetic divergenceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid19674302en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/72231/1/j.1365-294X.2009.04305.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04305.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceMolecular Ecologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlford RA, Richards SJ ( 1999 ) Global amphibian declines: a problem in applied ecology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 30, 133 – 165.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaker AJ, Moeed A ( 1987 ) Rapid genetic differentiation and founder effect in colonizing populations of common mynas ( Acridotheres tristis ). Evolution, 41, 525 – 538.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarrett RDH, Schluter D ( 2008 ) Adaptation from standing genetic variation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23, 38 – 44.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerven KA, Grudzien TA ( 1990 ) Dispersal in the wood frog ( Rana sylvatica ) – implications for genetic population structure. Evolution, 44, 2047 – 2056.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBohonak AJ ( 2002 ) Ibd (isolation by distance): a program for analyses of isolation by distance. Journal of Heredity, 93, 153 – 154.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBouzat JL, Cheng HH, Lewin HA et al. ( 1998 ) Genetic evaluation of a demographic bottleneck in the Greater Prairie Chicken. Conservation Biology, 12, 836 – 843.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClegg SM, Degnan SM, Kikkawa J et al. ( 2002 ) Genetic consequences of sequential founder events by an island-colonizing bird. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 8127 – 8132.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCoulon a, Guillot G, Cosson JF et al. ( 2006 ) Genetic structure is influenced by landscape features: empirical evidence from a roe deer population. Molecular Ecology, 15, 1669 – 1679.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrow JF, Aoki K ( 1984 ) Group selection for a polygenic behavioral trait – estimating the degree of population subdivision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America-Biological Sciences, 81, 6073 – 6077.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCushman SA ( 2006 ) Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: a review and prospectus. Biological Conservation, 128, 231 – 240.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCushman SA, McKelvey KS, Hayden J, Schwartz MK ( 2006 ) Gene flow in complex landscapes: testing multiple hypotheses with causal modeling. American Naturalist, 168, 486 – 499.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEpps CW, Palsboll PJ, Wehausen JD et al. ( 2005 ) Highways block gene flow and cause a rapid decline in genetic diversity of desert bighorn sheep. Ecology Letters, 8, 1029 – 1038.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceESRI ( 2006 ) ArcGIS 9.2. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., Redlands, CA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFunk WC, Blouin MS, Corn PS et al. ( 2005 ) Population structure of Columbia spotted frogs ( Rana luteiventris ) is strongly affected by the landscape. Molecular Ecology, 14, 483 – 496.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGaggiotti OE, Lange O, Rassmann K, Gliddon C ( 1999 ) A comparison of two indirect methods for estimating average levels of gene flow using microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology, 8, 1513 – 1520.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGiles BE, Goudet J ( 1997 ) A case study of genetic structure in a plant metapopulation. In: Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics, and evolutio ( eds Hanski I, Gilpin ME ), Academic Press, San Diego, CA. pp. 429 – 454.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGlenn TC, Schable NA ( 2005 ) Isolating microsatellite DNA loci. Methods in Enzymology, 395, 202 – 222.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoudet J ( 1995 ) fstat (version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. Journal of Heredity, 86, 485 – 486.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHardy OJ, Vekemans X ( 2002 ) spagedi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Molecular Ecology Notes, 2, 618 – 620.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHardy OJ, Charbonnel N, Freville H, Heuertz M ( 2003 ) Microsatellite allele sizes: a simple test to assess their significance on genetic differentiation. Genetics, 163, 1467 – 1482.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHecnar SJ, M’Closkey RT ( 1996 ) Regional dynamics and the status of amphibians. Ecology, 77, 2091 – 2097.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHomer C, Huang CQ, Yang LM, Wylie B, Coan M ( 2004 ) Development of a 2001 national land-cover database for the United States. Photogrammetric Engineering And Remote Sensing, 70, 829 – 840.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHopey ME, Petranka JW ( 1994 ) Restriction of wood frogs to fish-free habitats – how important is adult choice. Copeia, 1994, 1023 – 1025.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJensen JL, Bohonak AJ, Kelley ST ( 2005 ) Isolation by distance, web service. Bmc Genetics, 6, 13 – 18.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJulian SE, King TL ( 2003 ) Novel tetranucleotide microsatellite DNA markers for the wood frog, Rana sylvatica. Molecular Ecology Notes, 3, 256 – 258.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKalinowski ST ( 2005 ) hp-rare 1.0: a computer program for performing rarefaction on measures of allelic richness. Molecular Ecology Notes, 5, 187 – 189.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeyghobadi N, Roland J, Matter SF, Strobeck C ( 2005 ) Among- and within-patch components of genetic diversity respond at different rates to habitat fragmentation: an empirical demonstration. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 272, 553 – 560.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKnowles LL, Richards CL ( 2005 ) Importance of genetic drift during Pleistocene divergence as revealed by analyses of genomic variation. Molecular Ecology, 14, 4023 – 4032.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee-Yaw JA, Irwin JT, Green DM ( 2008 ) Postglacial range expansion from northern refugia by the wood frog, Rana sylvatica. Molecular Ecology, 17, 867 – 884.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLegendre P, Legendre L ( 1998 ) Numerical Ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevins R ( 1969 ) Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America, 15, 237 – 240.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLowe WH, Likens GE, McPeek MA, Buso DC ( 2006 ) Linking direct and indirect data on dispersal: Isolation by slope in a headwater stream salamander. Ecology, 87, 334 – 339.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLuikart G, Cornuet JM ( 1998 ) Empirical evaluation of a test for identifying recently bottlenecked populations from allele frequency data. Conservation Biology, 12, 228 – 237.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMantel N ( 1967 ) Detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research, 27, 209 – 220.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcRae BH ( 2006 ) Isolation by resistance. Evolution, 60, 1551 – 1561.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorjan CL, Rieseberg LH ( 2004 ) How species evolve collectively: implications of gene flow and selection for the spread of advantageous alleles. Molecular Ecology, 13, 1341 – 1356.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNei M ( 1987 ) Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewman RA, Squire T ( 2001 ) Microsatellite variation and fine-scale population structure in the wood frog ( Rana sylvatica ). Molecular Ecology, 10, 1087 – 1100.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrsini L, Corander J, Alasentie A, Hanski I ( 2008 ) Genetic spatial structure in a butterfly metapopulation correlates better with past than present demographic structure. Molecular Ecology, 17, 2629 – 2642.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePannell JR, Charlesworth B ( 2000 ) Effects of metapopulation processes on measures of genetic diversity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 355, 1851 – 1864.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePerez-Espona S, Perez-Barberia FJ, McLeod JE et al. ( 2008 ) Landscape features affect gene flow of Scottish Highland red deer ( Cervus elaphus ). Molecular Ecology, 17, 981 – 996.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePiry S, Luikart G, Cornuet JM ( 1999 ) bottleneck: a computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective population size using allele frequency data. Journal of Heredity, 90, 502 – 503.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceProctor MF, McLellan BN, Strobeck C, Barclay RMR ( 2005 ) Genetic analysis reveals demographic fragmentation of grizzly bears yielding vulnerably small populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 272, 2409 – 2416.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRay N ( 2005 ) pathmatrix: a geographical information system tool to compute effective distances among samples. Molecular Ecology Notes, 5, 177 – 180.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaymond M, Rousset F ( 1995 ) Genepop (version-1.2) – population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity, 86, 248 – 249.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRegosin JV, Windmiller BS, Reed JM ( 2003 ) Terrestrial habitat use and winter densities of the wood frog ( Rana sylvatica ). Journal of Herpetology, 37, 390 – 394.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRelyea RA ( 2002 ) Local population differences in phenotypic plasticity: Predator-induced changes in wood frog tadpoles. Ecological Monographs, 72, 77 – 93.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRice WR ( 1989 ) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution, 43, 223 – 225.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRicketts TH ( 2001 ) The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. American Naturalist, 158, 87 – 99.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRiley SPD, Pollinger JP, Sauvajot RM et al. ( 2006 ) A southern California freeway is a physical and social barrier to gene flow in carnivores. Molecular Ecology, 15, 1733 – 1741.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRowe G, Beebee TJC, Burke T ( 1998 ) Phylogeography of the natterjack toad Bufo calamita in Britain: genetic differentiation of native and translocated populations. Molecular Ecology, 7, 751 – 760.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSkelly DK ( 2004 ) Microgeographic countergradient variation in the wood frog, Rana sylvatica. Evolution, 58, 160 – 165.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSkelly DK, Werner EE, Cortwright SA ( 1999 ) Long-term distributional dynamics of a Michigan amphibian assemblage. Ecology, 80, 2326 – 2337.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSkole D, Tucker C ( 1993 ) Tropical deforestation and habitat fragmentation in the Amazon – satellite data from 1978 to 1988. Science, 260, 1905 – 1910.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSlatkin M ( 1977 ) Gene flow and genetic drift in a species subject to frequent local extinctions. Theoretical Population Biology, 12, 253 – 262.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith MA, Green DM ( 2005 ) Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation: are all amphibian populations metapopulations? Ecography, 28, 110 – 128.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmouse PE, Long JC, Sokal RR ( 1986 ) Multiple-regression and correlation extensions of the Mantel test of matrix correspondence. Systematic Zoology, 35, 627 – 632.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpear SF, Peterson CR, Matocq MD, Storfer A ( 2005 ) Landscape genetics of the blotched tiger salamander ( Ambystoma tigrinum melanostictum ). Molecular Ecology, 14, 2553 – 2564.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStuart SN, Chanson JS, Cox NA et al. ( 2004 ) Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science, 306, 1783 – 1786.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrenham PC, Koenig WD, Mossman MJ, Stark SL, Jagger LA ( 2003 ) Regional dynamics of wetland-breeding frogs and toads: Turnover and synchrony. Ecological Applications, 13, 1522 – 1532.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P ( 2004 ) micro-checker: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology Notes, 4, 535 – 538.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVandergast AG, Bohonak AJ, Weissman DB, Fisher RN ( 2007 ) Understanding the genetic effects of recent habitat fragmentation in the context of evolutionary history: phylogeography and landscape genetics of a southern California endemic Jerusalem cricket (Orthoptera : Stenopelmatidae : Stenopelmatus). Molecular Ecology, 16, 977 – 992.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVarvio SL, Chakraborty R, Nei M ( 1986 ) Genetic-variation in subdivided populations and conservation genetics. Heredity, 57, 189 – 198.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWade MJ, McCauley DE ( 1988 ) Extinction and recolonization – their effects on the genetic differentiation of local-populations. Evolution, 42, 995 – 1005.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeir BS, Cockerham CC ( 1984 ) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution, 38, 1358 – 1370.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWerner EE, Yurewicz KL, Skelly DK, Relyea RA ( 2007 ) Turnover in an amphibian metacommunity: the role of local and regional factors. Oikos, 116, 1713 – 1725.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhitlock MC, Barton NH ( 1997 ) The effective size of a subdivided population. Genetics, 146, 427 – 441.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhitlock MC, McCauley DE ( 1990 ) Some population genetic consequences of colony formation and extinction – genetic correlations within founding groups. Evolution, 44, 1717 – 1724.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWright S ( 1951 ) The genetical structure of populations. Annals of Eugenics, 15, 323 – 354.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1365-294X.2009.04305.x.pdf
Size:
305.0KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.