View Item 

Show simple item record

Comparative analysis of collagen membranes for the treatment of implant dehiscence defects
dc.contributor.authorOh, Tae-Juen_US
dc.contributor.authorMeraw, Stephen J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, Eun-Juen_US
dc.contributor.authorGiannobile, William V.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hom-Layen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T19:03:50Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T19:03:50Z
dc.date.issued2003-02en_US
dc.identifier.citationOh, Tae-Ju; Meraw, Stephen J.; Lee, Eun-Ju; Giannobile, William V.; Wang, Hom-Lay (2003). "Comparative analysis of collagen membranes for the treatment of implant dehiscence defects." Clinical Oral Implants Research 14(1): 80-90. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72252>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-0501en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72252
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=12562369&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractGuided bone regeneration (GBR) evolved from the concept of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) and has been used for reconstructing sites with bone deficiencies associated with dental implants. For GBR, the use of absorbable collagen membranes has been increasing, but, at present, scientific information on the use of collagen membranes for GBR is limited. This study was aimed to clinically and histomorphometrically compare two collagen membranes, Bio-Gide ® and BioMend Extend TM , for the treatment of implant dehiscence defects in eight mongrel dogs. Implant dehiscence defects were surgically created in edentulous ridges, followed by the placement of three endosseous implants bilaterally in the mandible. Each implant dehiscence defect was randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: (1) control (no membrane), (2) porcine dermis collagen barrier (Bio-Gide) or (3) bovine tendon collagen barrier (BioMend Extend). Dogs were sacrificed at 4 and 16 weeks (four dogs each) after treatment. Histomorphometric analysis included percentage linear bone fill (LF), new bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and area of new bone fill (BF). The results of the study revealed no significant differences among groups for any parameter at 4 weeks. However, at 16 weeks, more LF, BIC, and BF were noted in the membrane-treated groups than controls. BioMend Extend-treated defects demonstrated significantly greater BIC than control ( P  < 0.05) at this time point. BIC at 16 weeks was significantly greater than 4-week BIC ( P  < 0.05). Membrane exposure occurred in 9 out of 15 sites examined, resulting in significantly less LF and BIC than the sites without membrane exposure ( P  < 0.05). The results of this study indicate that: (1) GBR treatment with collagen membranes may significantly enhance bone regeneration, manifested at late stage (16 weeks) of healing; and (2) space maintenance and membrane coverage were the two most important factors affecting GBR using bioabsorbable collagen membranes.en_US
dc.format.extent580398 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherMunksgaard International Publishersen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights© Munksgaard 2003en_US
dc.subject.otherBarrier Membranesen_US
dc.subject.otherBioabsorbableen_US
dc.subject.otherCollagen Membraneen_US
dc.subject.otherDental Implantsen_US
dc.subject.otherGuided Bone Regenerationen_US
dc.subject.otherImplant Dehiscence Defectsen_US
dc.subject.otherMembrane Exposureen_US
dc.titleComparative analysis of collagen membranes for the treatment of implant dehiscence defectsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherAuthors' affiliations:en_US
dc.identifier.pmid12562369en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/72252/1/j.1600-0501.2003.140111.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140111.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceClinical Oral Implants Researchen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBalshi, T. J., Hernandez, R. E., Cutler, R. H. & Hertzog, C. F. ( 1991 ) Treatment of osseous defects using Vicryl mesh (polyglactin 910) and the Branemark implant: a case report. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 6: 87 – 91.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBecker, W., Dahlin, C., Becker, B., Lekholm, U., van Steenberghe, D., Higuchi, K. & Kultje, C. ( 1994 ) The use of e-PTFE membranes for bone promotion around titanium implants placed into extraction sockets: a prospective multicenter study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 9: 31 – 40.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBecker, W., Lynch, S. E., Lekholm, U., Becker, B. E., Caffesse, R., Donath, K. & Sanchez, R. ( 1992 ) A comparison of ePTFE membranes alone or in combination with platelet-derived growth factors and insulin-like growth factor-I or demineralized freeze-dried bone in promoting bone formation around immediate extraction socket implants. Journal of Periodontology 63: 929 – 940.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBloebaum, R. D., Sanderson, C., McCarvill, S. & Campbell, P. ( 1989 ) Plastic slides in the preparation of implant and tissue for interface analysis. Journal of Histotechnology 12: 307 – 310.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlumenthal, N. M. ( 1988 ) The use of collagen membranes to guide regeneration of new connective tissue attachment in dogs. Journal of Periodontology 59: 830 – 836.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyne, P. J. ( 1969 ) Restoration of osseous defects in maxillofacial causalities. Journal of American Dental Association 78: 767 – 776.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuser, D., Nydegger, T., Hirt, H. P., Cochran, D. L. & Nolte, L. P. ( 1998 ) Removal torque of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 13: 611 – 619.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuser, D., Schenk, R. K., Steinemann, S., Fiorellini, J. P., Fox, C. H. & Stich, H. ( 1991 ) Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants: a histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 25: 889 – 902.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarpio, L., Loza, J., Lynch, S. & Genco, R. ( 2000 ) Guided bone regeneration around endosseous implants with anorganic bovine bone mineral. A randomized controlled trial comparing bioabsorbable versus non-absorbable barriers. Journal of Periodontology 71: 1743 – 1749.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCochran, D. L. ( 1999 ) A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces. Journal of Periodontology. 70: 1523 – 1539.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrigger, M., Bogle, G. C., Garrett, S. & Gantes, B. G. ( 1996 ) Repair following treatment of circumferential periodontal defects in dogs with collagen and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene barrier membranes. Journal of Periodontology 67: 403 – 413.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDahlin, C., Andersson, L. & Linde, A. ( 1991 ) Bone augmentation at fenestrated implants by an osteopromotive membrane technique: a controlled clinical study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2: 159 – 165.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDahlin, C., Gottlow, J., Linde, A. & Nyman, S. ( 1990 ) Healing of maxillary and mandibular bone defects using a membrane technique: An experimental study in monkeys. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery 24: 13 – 19.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDahlin, C., Linde, A., Gottlow, J. & Nyman, S. ( 1988 ) Healing of bone defects by guided bone regeneration. Plastic Reconstructive Surgery 81: 672 – 676.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFritz, M. E., Jeffcoat, M. K., Reddy, M., Koth, D., Braswell, L. D., Malmquist, J. & Lemons, J. ( 2000 ) Guided bone regeneration of large mandibular defects in a primate model. Journal of Periodontology 71: 1484 – 1489.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFugazzotto, P. A., Shanaman, R., Manos, T. & Shectman, R. ( 1997 ) Guided bone regeneration around titanium implants: Report of the treatment of 1,503 sites with clinical reentries. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 17: 292 – 299.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGher, M. E., Quintero, G., Assad, D., Monaco, E. & Richardson, A. C. ( 1994 ) Bone grafting and guided bone regeneration for immediate dental implants in humans. Journal of Periodontology 65: 881 – 891.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGiannobile, W. V., Ryan, S., Shih, M. S., Su, D. L., Kaplan, P. L. & Chan, T. C. ( 1998 ) Recombinant human osteogenic protein-1 (OP-1) stimulates periodontal wound healing in class III furcation defects. Journal of Periodontology 69: 129 – 137.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGotfredsen, K., Nimb, L., Buser, D. & HjØrting-Hansen, E. ( 1993 ) Evaluation of guided bone regeneration around implants placed into fresh extraction sockets: An experimental study in dogs. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 51: 879 – 884.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHÄmmerle, C. H. ( 1999 ) Membranes and bone substitutes in guided bone regeneration. In: Lang, N. P., Karring, T. & Lindhe, J., eds. Proceedings of the 3rd European Workshop on Periodontology, p. 483. Berlin: Quintessence Publishing Co.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHÄmmerle, C. H., Chiantella, G. C., Karring, T. & Lang, N. P. ( 1998 ) The effect of a deproteinized bovine bone mineral on bone regeneration around titanium dental implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research 9: 151 – 162.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHÄmmerle, C. H., Schmid, J., Olah, A. J. & Lang, N. P. ( 1992 ) Osseous healing of experimentally created defects in the calvaria of rabbits using guided bone regeneration: a pilot study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 3: 144 – 147.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHenry, P. J., Tan, A. E., Leavy, J., Johansson, C. B. & Albrektsson, T. ( 1997 ) Tissue regeneration in bony defects adjacent to immediately loaded titanium implants placed into extraction sockets: a study in dogs. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 12: 758 – 766.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHermann, J. S. & Buser, D. ( 1996 ) Guided bone regeneration for dental implants. Current Opinion in Periodontology 3: 168 – 177.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHÜrzeler, M. B., Kohal, R. J., Naghshbandi, J., Mota, L. F., Conradt, J., Hutmacher, D. & Caffesse, R. G. ( 1998 ) Evaluation of a new bioresorbable barrier to facilitate guided bone regeneration around exposed implant threads: An experimental study in the monkey. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 4: 315 – 320.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHutmacher, D., HÜrzeler, M. B. & Schliephake, H. ( 1996 ) A review of material properties of biodegradable and bioresorbable polymers and devices for GTR and GBR applications. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 11: 667 – 678.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKohal, R. J., Mellas, P., HÜrzeler, M. B., Trejo, P. M., Morrison, E. & Caffesse, R. G. ( 1998 ) The effects of guided bone regeneration and grafting on implants placed into immediate extraction sockets. An experimental study in dogs. Journal of Periodontology 69: 927 – 937.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLam, R. V. ( 1960 ) Contour changes of the alveolar process following extraction. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 10: 25 – 32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLekholm, U., Becker, W., Dahlin, C., Becker, B., Donath, K. & Morrison, E. ( 1993 ) The role of early versus late removal of GTAM membranes on bone formation at oral implants placed into immediate extraction sockets: An experimental study in dogs. Clinical Oral Implants Research 4: 121 – 129.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLekholm, U. & Zarb, G. A. ( 1985 ) Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. In: Branemark, P. -I., Zarb, G. A. & Albrektson, T., eds. Patient Selection and Preparation, p. 199. Chicago: Quintessence Publications Co.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLinde, A., Alberius, P., Dahlin, C., Bjurstam, K. & Sundin, Y. ( 1993a ) Osteopromotion: a soft tissue exclusion principle using a membrane for bone healing and bone neogenisis. Journal of Periodontology 64: 1116 – 1128.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLinde, A., Thoren, C., Dahlin, C. & Sandberg, E. ( 1993b ) Creation of new bone by an osteopromotive membrane technique: An experimental study in rats. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 51: 892 – 897.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLundgren, D., Sennerby, L., Falk, H., Friberg, B. & Nyman, S. ( 1994 ) The use of a new bioabsorbable barrier for guided bone regeneration in connection with implant installation: Case reports. Clinical Oral Implants Research 5: 177 – 184.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMachtei, E. ( 2001 ) The effect of membrane exposure on the outcome of regenerative procedures in humans: a meta-analysis. Journal of Periodontology 72: 512 – 516.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMayfield, L., Nobreus, N., Attstrom, R. & Linde, A. ( 1997 ) Guided bone regeneration in dental implant treatment using a bioabsorbable membrane. Clinical Oral Implants Research 8: 10 – 17.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMellonig, J. T. & Nevins, M. ( 1995 ) Guided bone regeneration of bone defects associated with implants: An evidence-based outcome assessment. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 15: 168 – 185.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNowzari, H. & Slots, J. ( 1995 ) Microbiologic and clinical study of polytetrafluoroethylene membrane for guided bone regeneration around implants. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 10: 67 – 72.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOwens, K. W. & Yukna, R. A. ( 2001 ) Collagen membrane resorption in dogs: a comparative study. Implant Dentistry 10: 48 – 58.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParma-Benfenati, S., Tinti, C., Albrektsson, T. & Johansson, C. ( 1999 ) Histological evaluation of guided vertical ridge augmentation around dental implants in humans. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 19: 425 – 437.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeleg, M., Chaushu, G., Blinder, D. & Taicher, S. ( 1999 ) Use of lyodura for bone augmentation of osseous defects around dental implants. Journal of Periodontology 70: 853 – 860.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePostlethwaite, A. E., Seyer, J. M. & Kang, A. H. ( 1978 ) Chemotactic attraction of human fibroblast to type I, II, and III collagens and collagen derived peptides. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 75: 870 – 875.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSandberg, E., Dahlin, C. & Linde, A. ( 1993 ) Bone regeneration by the osteopromotion technique using bioabsorbable membranes: An experimental study in rats. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 51: 1106 – 1114.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSanderson, C. & Kitabayashi, L. R. ( 1994 ) Parallel experiences of two different laboratories with the initiator Perkadox 16 for polymerization of methylmethacrylate. Journal of Histotechnology 17: 343 – 348.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchenk, R., Buser, D., Harwick, W. R. & Dahlin, C. ( 1994 ) Healing pattern of bone regeneration in membrane-protected defects: a histologic study in the canine mandible. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 9: 13 – 29.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchliephake, H., Dard, M., Planck, H., Hierlemann, H. & Jakob, A. ( 2000 ) Guided bone regeneration around endosseous implants using a resorbable membrane vs. a PTFE membrane. Clinical Oral Implants Research 11: 230 – 241.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSevor, J. & Meffert, R. ( 1992 ) Placement of implants into fresh extraction sites using a resorbable collagen membrane: Case reports. Practical Periodontics and Aesthetic Dentistry 4: 35 – 41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSevor, J., Meffert, R. & Cassingham, R. ( 1993 ) Regeneration of dehisced alveolar bone adjacent to endosseous dental implants utilizing a resorbable collagen membrane: Clinical and histologic results. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 13: 71 – 83.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimion, M., Baldoni, M., Rossi, P. & Zaffe, D. ( 1994a ) A comparative study of the effectiveness of ePTFE membranes with and without early exposure during the healing period. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 14: 167 – 180.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimion, M., Dahlin, C., Trisi, P. & Piattelli, A. ( 1994b ) Qualitative and quantitative comparative study on different filling materials used in bone tissue regeneration: a controlled clinical study. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 14: 199 – 215.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStentz, W. C., Mealey, B. L., Gunsolley, J. C. & Waldrop, T. C. ( 1997 ) Effects of guided bone regeneration around commercially pure titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. II. Histologic analysis. Journal of Periodontology 68: 933 – 949.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang, H. L. & MacNeil, R. L. ( 1998 ) Guided tissue regeneration. Absorbable barriers. Dental Clinics of North America. 42: 505 – 522.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang, H. L., O'Neal, R. B., Thomas, C. L., Shyr, Y. & MacNeil, R. L. ( 1994 ) Evaluation of an absorbable collagen membrane in treating class II furcation defects. Journal of Periodontology 65: 1029 – 1036.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWennerberg, A., Hallgren, C., Johansson, C. & Danelli, S. ( 1998 ) A histomorphometric evaluation of screw-shaped implants each prepared with two surface roughness. Clinical Oral Implants Research 9: 11 – 19.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYukna, C. N. & Yukna, R. A. ( 1996 ) Multi-center evaluation of bioabsorbable collagen membrane for guided tissue regeneration in human class II furcations. Journal of Periodontology 67: 650 – 657.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZablotsky, M., Meffert, R., Caudill, R. & Evans, G. ( 1991 ) Histological and clinical comparisons of guided tissue regeneration on dehisced hydroxylapatite-coated and titanium endosseous implant surfaces: a pilot study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 6: 294 – 303.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZellin, G., Gritli-Linde, A. & Linde, A. ( 1995 ) Healing of mandibular defects with different biodegradable and non-biodegradable membranes: An experimental study in rats. Biomaterials 16: 601 – 609.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZitzmann, N. U., Naef, R. & Scharer, P. ( 1997 ) Resorbable versus non-resorbable membranes in combination with Bio-Oss for guided bone regeneration. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 12: 844 – 852.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1600-0501.2003.140111.x.pdf
Size:
566.7KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.