View Item 

Show simple item record

Long-Term Results of Conservative Surgery and Radiotherapy for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Using Lung Density Correction: The University of Michigan Experience
dc.contributor.authorBen-David, Merav A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSturtz, David E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGriffith, Kent A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDouglas, Kathye R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHayman, James A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLichter, Allen S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPierce, Lori J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T19:22:37Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T19:22:37Z
dc.date.issued2007-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationBen-David, Merav A.; Sturtz, David E.; Griffith, Kent A.; Douglas, Kathye R.; Hayman, James A.; Lichter, Allen S.; Pierce, Lori J. (2007). "Long-Term Results of Conservative Surgery and Radiotherapy for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Using Lung Density Correction: The University of Michigan Experience." The Breast Journal 13(4): 392-400. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72520>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1075-122Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1524-4741en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72520
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=17593044&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent601131 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights2007 Copyright the Authors Journal compilation 2007 Blackwell Publishing Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherBreast Conservationen_US
dc.subject.otherDCISen_US
dc.subject.otherLung Density Correctionen_US
dc.subject.otherRadiotherapyen_US
dc.titleLong-Term Results of Conservative Surgery and Radiotherapy for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Using Lung Density Correction: The University of Michigan Experienceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelObstetrics and Gynecologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumBiostatistics Core, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationother* Radiation Oncologyen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherPathologyen_US
dc.identifier.pmid17593044en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/72520/1/j.1524-4741.2007.00447.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1524-4741.2007.00447.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe Breast Journalen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurstein HJ, Polyak K, Wong JS, Lester SC, Kaelin CM. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 1430 – 41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFisher B, Costantino J, Redmond C, et al. Lumpectomy compared with lumpectomy and radiation therapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 1581 – 86.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFisher B, Dignam J, Wolmark N, et al. Lumpectomy and radiation therapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-17. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 441 – 52.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJulien JP, Bijker N, Fentiman IS, et al. Radiotherapy in breast-conserving treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: first results of the EORTC randomised phase III trial 10853. EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group and EORTC Radiotherapy Group. Lancet 2000; 355: 528 – 33.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoughton J, George WD, Cuzick J, Duggan C, Fentiman IS, Spittle M. Radiotherapy and tamoxifen in women with completely excised ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2003; 362: 95 – 102.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFraass BA, Lichter AS, McShan DL, et al. The influence of lung density corrections on treatment planning for primary breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1988; 14: 179 – 90.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSolin LJ, Chu JC, Sontag MR, et al. Three-dimensional photon treatment planning of the intact breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1991; 21: 193 – 203.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan Dyk J, Keane TJ, Rider WD. Lung density as measured by computerized tomography: implications for radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1982; 8: 1363 – 72.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosenblum LJ, Mauceri RA, Wellenstein DE, et al. Density patterns in the normal lung as determined by computed tomography. Radiology 1980; 137: 409 – 16.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePierce LJ, Strawderman MH, Douglas KR, Lichter AS. Conservative surgery and radiotherapy for early-stage breast cancer using a lung density correction: the University of Michigan experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997; 39: 921 – 28.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePierce LJ, Griffith KA, Hayman JA, Douglas KR, Lichter AS. Conservative surgery and radiotherapy for stage I/II breast cancer using lung density correction: 10-year and 15-year results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 61: 1317 – 27.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarris JR, Levene MB, Svensson G, Hellman S. Analysis of cosmetic results following primary radiation therapy for stages I and II carcinoma of the breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1979; 5: 257 – 61.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOlivotto IA, Rose MA, Osteen RT, et al. Late cosmetic outcome after conservative surgery and radiotherapy: analysis of causes of cosmetic failure. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1989; 17: 747 – 53.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958; 53: 457 – 81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE. Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Stat Med 1999; 18: 695 – 706.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePepe M. Inference for events with dependent risks in multiple endpoint studies. JASA 1991; 86: 770 – 78.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFisher B, Dignam J, Wolmark N, et al. Tamoxifen in treatment of intraductal breast cancer: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-24 randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1999; 353: 1993 – 2000.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencehttp://ctep.cancer.gov/forms/CTCAEv3.pdf. Accessed April 1, 2006.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRodrigues N, Carter D, Dillon D, Parisot N, Choi DH, Haffty BG. Correlation of clinical and pathologic features with outcome in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002; 54: 1331 – 35.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNakamura S, Woo C, Silberman H, Streeter OE, Lewinsky BS, Silverstein MJ. Breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ: a 20-year experience with excision plus radiation therapy. Am J Surg 2002; 184: 403 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCutuli B, Cohen-Solal-le Nir C, de Lafontan B, et al. Breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: the French Cancer Centers’ experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002; 53: 868 – 79.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVargas C, Kestin L, Go N, et al. Factors associated with local recurrence and cause-specific survival in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast treated with breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 63: 141 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFraass BA, Roberson PL, Lichter AS. Dose to the contralateral breast due to primary breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1985; 11: 485 – 97.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSolin LJ, Fourquet A, Vicini FA, et al. Mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast treated with breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation: long-term outcome and prognostic significance of patient age and margin status. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001; 50: 991 – 1002.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSolin LJ, Fourquet A, Vicini FA, et al. Salvage treatment for local or local-regional recurrence after initial breast conservation treatment with radiation for ductal carcinoma in situ. Eur J Cancer 2005; 41: 1715 – 23.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKestin LL, Goldstein NS, Martinez AA, et al. Mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ treated with conservative surgery with or without radiation therapy: patterns of failure and 10-year results. Ann Surg 2000; 231: 235 – 45.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVicini FA, Kestin LL, Goldstein NS, et al. Impact of young age on outcome in patients with ductal carcinoma-in-situ treated with breast-conserving therapy. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 296 – 306.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSolin LJ, Fourquet A, Vicini FA, et al. Long-term outcome after breast-conservation treatment with radiation for mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Cancer 2005; 103: 1137 – 46.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldstein NS, Vicini FA, Kestin LL, Thomas M. Differences in the pathologic features of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast based on patient age. Cancer 2000; 88: 2553 – 60.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRodrigues NA, Dillon D, Carter D, Parisot N, Haffty BG. Differences in the pathologic and molecular features of intraductal breast carcinoma between younger and older women. Cancer 2003; 97: 1393 – 403.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBijker N, Peterse JL, Duchateau L, et al. Risk factors for recurrence and metastasis after breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma-in-situ: analysis of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial 10853. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 2263 – 71.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwartz GF, Solin LJ, Olivotto IA, Ernster VL, Pressman PI. Consensus Conference on the Treatment of In Situ Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast, April 22-25, 1999. Cancer 2000; 88: 946 – 54.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSilverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Groshen S, et al. The influence of margin width on local control of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 1455 – 61.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFisher ER, Dignam J, Tan-Chiu E, et al. Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (NSABP) eight-year update of Protocol B-17: intraductal carcinoma. Cancer 1999; 86: 429 – 38.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceConsensus. Conference on the classification of ductal carcinoma in situ. The Consensus Conference Committee. Cancer 1997; 80: 1798 – 802.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhite J, Levine A, Gustafson G, et al. Outcome and prognostic factors for local recurrence in mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995; 31: 791 – 97.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaxter NN, Virnig BA, Durham SB, Tuttle TM. Radiation after lumpectomy for DCIS to reduce the risk of invasive breast cancer: A population-based study. 2005 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceeding J Clin Oncol 2005; 23 ( June 1 Suppl ): 516.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFowble B, Hanlon AL, Fein DA, et al. Results of conservative surgery and radiation for mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1997; 38: 949 – 57.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGao X, Fisher SG, Emami B. Risk of second primary cancer in the contralateral breast in women treated for early-stage breast cancer: a population-based study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003; 56: 1038 – 45.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTaylor ME, Perez CA, Halverson KJ, et al. Factors influencing cosmetic results after conservation therapy for breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995; 31: 753 – 64.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWazer DE, DiPetrillo T, Schmidt-Ullrich R, et al. Factors influencing cosmetic outcome and complication risk after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for early-stage breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 1992; 10: 356 – 63.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1524-4741.2007.00447.x.pdf
Size:
587.0KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.