View Item 

Show simple item record

Cost-effectiveness of Automated External Defibrillator Deployment in Selected Public Locations
dc.contributor.authorCram, Peteren_US
dc.contributor.authorVijan, Sandeepen_US
dc.contributor.authorFendrick, A. Marken_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T19:24:18Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T19:24:18Z
dc.date.issued2003-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationCram, Peter; Vijan, Sandeep; Fendrick, A. Mark (2003). "Cost-effectiveness of Automated External Defibrillator Deployment in Selected Public Locations." Journal of General Internal Medicine 18(9): 745-754. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72546>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0884-8734en_US
dc.identifier.issn1525-1497en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72546
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=12950484&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractThe American Heart Association (AHA) recommends an automated external defibrillator (AED) be considered for a specific location if there is at least a 20% annual probability the device will be used. We sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the AHA recommendation and of AED deployment in selected public locations with known cardiac arrest rates. DESIGN: Markov Decision Model employing a societal perspective. SETTING: Selected public locations in the United States. PATIENTS: A simulated cohort of the American public. INTERVENTION: Strategy 1: individuals experiencing cardiac arrest were treated by emergency medical services equipped with AEDs (EMS-D). Strategy 2: individuals were treated with AEDs deployed as part of a public access defibrillation program. Strategies differed only in the initial availability of an AED and its impact on cardiac arrest survival. RESULTS: Under the base-case assumption that a deployed AED will be used on 1 cardiac arrest every 5 years (20% annual probability of AED use), the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained is $30,000 for AED deployment compared with EMS-D care. AED deployment costs less than $50,000 per QALY gained provided that the annual probability of AED use is 12% or greater. Monte Carlo simulation conducted while holding the annual probability of AED use at 20% demonstrated that 87% of the trials had a cost-effectiveness ratio of less than $50,000 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: AED deployment is likely to be cost-effective across a range of public locations. The current AHA guidelines are overly restrictive. Limited expansion of these programs can be justified on clinical and economic grounds.en_US
dc.format.extent4750407 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Science Incen_US
dc.rights2003 by the Society of General Internal Medicineen_US
dc.subject.otherEmergency Medical Servicesen_US
dc.subject.otherHeart Arresten_US
dc.subject.otherElectric Countershocken_US
dc.subject.otherPublic Access Defibrillationen_US
dc.titleCost-effectiveness of Automated External Defibrillator Deployment in Selected Public Locationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumReceived from the Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (PC), University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa; and Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine (SV, AMF), Consortium for Health Outcomes, Innovation, and Cost Effectiveness Studies (AMF), Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Field Program (SV), and Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health (AMF), Ann Arbor, Mich.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid12950484en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/72546/1/j.1525-1497.2003.21139.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.21139.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of General Internal Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citedreference1. The American Heart Association. Guidelines 2000 for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2000; 2: 1 – 76.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZheng Z-J, Croft JB, Giles WH, Mensah GA. Sudden cardiac death in the United States, 1989 to 1998. Circulation. 2001; 104: 2158 – 63.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBecker LB, Ostrander MP, Barrett J, Kondos GT. Outcome of CPR in a large metropolitan area—where are the survivors? Ann Emerg Med. 1991; 20: 355 – 61.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLombardi G, Gallagher J, Gennis P. Outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in New York City. JAMA. 1994; 271: 678 – 83.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith SC, Hamburg RS. Automated external defibrillators: time for federal and state advocacy and broader utilization. Circulation. 1998; 97: 1321 – 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEisenberg M. Is it time for over-the-counter defibrillators? JAMA. 2000; 284: 1435 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiberthson RR, Nagel EL, Hirschman JC, Nussenfeld S. Prehospital ventricular defibrillation. N Engl J Med. 1974; 291: 317 – 21.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceValenzuela TD, Roe DJ, Nichol G, Clark LL, Spaite DW, Hardman RG. Outcomes of rapid defibrillation by security officers after cardiac arrest in casinos. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343: 1206 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePage RL, Joglar JA, Kowal RC, Zagrodzky JD, Nelson LL, Ramaswamy K. Use of automated external defibrillators by a U.S. airline. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343: 1210 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCaffrey SL, Willoughby PJ, Pepe PE, Becker LB. Public use of automated external defibrillators. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 1242 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference11. Community Access to Emergency Defibrillation Act of 2001. 107th Congress, 2001. Available at: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?r107:5:./temp/~r107D3P1y7. Accessed March 31, 2003.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJermyn BD. Cost-effectiveness analysis of rural/urban first-responder defibrillation program. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2000; 4: 43 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFoutz RA, Sayre MR. Automated external defibrillators in long-term care facilities are cost-effective. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2000; 4: 314 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNichol G, Hallstrom AP, Ornato JP, et al. Potential cost-effectiveness of public access defibrillation in the United States. Circulation. 1998; 97: 1315 – 20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBecker L, Eisenberg M, Fahrenbruch C, Cobb L. Cardiac arrest in medical and dental practices. Arch Intern Med. 2001; 161: 1509 – 12.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBecker L, Eisenberg M, Fahrenbruch C, Cobb L. Public locations of cardiac arrest: implications for public access defibrillation. Circulation. 1998; 97: 2106 – 09.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrank RL, Rausch MA, Menegazzi JJ, Rickens M. The locations of nonresidential out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in the city of Pittsburgh over a three-year period. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2001; 5: 247 – 51.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference18. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Healthcare inflation index 1998–2002. Available at: http://cms.hhs.gov/statistics/health-indicators/t9.asp. Accessed March 31, 2003.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC, eds. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1996.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWassertheil J, Keane G, Fisher N, Leditschke JF. Cardiac arrest outcomes at the Melbourne cricket ground and shrine of remembrance using a tiered response strategy—a forerunner to public access defibrillation. Resuscitation. 2000; 44: 97 – 104.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference21. Zoll Medical Corporation. Cost of AEDs. Available at: http://www.zoll.com/aed.htm. Accessed March 31, 2003.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGroeneveld PW, Kwong JL, Liu J, et al. Cost-effectiveness of automated external defibrillators on airlines. JAMA. 2001; 286: 1482 – 89.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference23. Bureau of Labor Statistics. National compensation survey: occupational wages in the United States, 2001. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/ncs/ocs/sp/ncbl0449.pdf. Accessed March 31, 2003.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMushlin AI, Hall WJ, Zwanziger J, et al. The cost-effectiveness of automatic implantable cardiac defibrillators: results from MADIT. Circulation. 1998; 97: 2129 – 35.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLarsen G, Hallstrom A, McAnulty J, Pinski S, Olarte A, Sullivan S. Cost-effectiveness of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator versus antiarrhythmic drugs in survivors of serious ventricular tachyarrhythmias: results of the AVID economic analysis substudy. Circulation. 2002; 105: 2049 – 57.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSweeney TA, Runge JW, Gibbs MA, et al. EMT defibrillation does not increase survival from sudden cardiac death in a two-tiered urban-suburban EMS system. Ann Emerg Med. 1998; 31: 234 – 40.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMosesso VN Jr, Davis EA, Auble TE, Paris PM, Yealy DM. Use of automated external defibrillators by police officers for treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Ann Emerg Med. 1998; 32: 200 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStults KR, Brown DD, Kerber RE. Efficacy of an automated external defibrillator in the management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: validation of the diagnostic algorithm and initial clinical experience in a rural environment. Circulation. 1986; 73: 701 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSedgwick ML, Dalziel K, Watson J, Carrington DJ, Cobbe SM. Performance of an established system of first responder out-of-hospital defibrilation. The results of the second year of the Heartstart Scotland Project in the ‘Utstein style’. Resuscitation. 1993; 26: 75 – 88.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceValenzuela TD, Roe DJ, Cretin S, Spaite DW, Larsen MP. Estimating effectiveness of cardiac arrest interventions. Circulation. 1997; 96: 3308 – 13.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference31. The Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Investigators. The Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Investigators. A comparison of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias. N Engl J Med. 1997; 337: 1576 – 83.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceConnolly SJ, Hallstrom AP, Cappato R, et al. Meta-analysis of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator secondary prevention trials. Eur Heart J. 2000; 21: 2071 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCobbe SM, Dalziel K, Ford I, Marsden AK. Survival of 1476 patients initially resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. BMJ. 1996; 312: 1633 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKuilman M, Bleeker Jan K, Hartman AM, Simoons ML. Long-term survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: an 8-year follow-up. Resuscitation. 1999; 41: 25 – 31.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGranja C, Cabral G, Pinto AT, Costa-Pereira A. Quality of life 6-months after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2002; 37: 37 – 44.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNichol G, Stiell IG, Hebert P, Wells GA, Vandemheen K, Laupacis A. What is the quality of life for survivors of cardiac arrest? A prospective study. Ann Emerg Med. 1999; 6: 95 – 102.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTorrance GW, Furlong W, Feeny D, Byle M. Multi-attribute preference functions: health utilities index. Pharmacoeconomics. 1995; 7: 503 – 20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference38. The EuroQol Group. EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy (New York). 1990; 16: 199 – 208.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGage BF, Cardinalli AB, Owens DK. The effect of stroke and stroke prophylaxis with aspirin or warfarin on quality of life. Arch Intern Med. 1996; 156: 1829 – 36.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDoubilet P, Begg CB, Weinstein MC, Braun P, McNeil BJ. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulation. Med Decis Making. 1985; 5: 155 – 77.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePasta DJ, Taylor JL, Henning JM. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis incorporating the bootstrap. Med Decis Making. 1999; 19: 353 – 63.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference42. National Center for Early Defibrillation. Available at: http://www.early-defib.org/. Accessed March 31, 2003.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePereira J. For the fearful: portable defibrillators. Wall Street Journal. September 1, 1999: section B: 1.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchimke A. Huron grads offer gift of life to school. Ann Arbor News. March 14, 2001: section D: 1.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference45. Public Access Defibrillation Trial. Available at: http://depts.washington.edu/padctc/. Accessed March 31, 2003.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrum P, Vijan S, Wolbrink A, Fendrick AM. The impact of including passive benefits in cost-effectiveness analysis: the case of automated external defibrillators on commercial aircraft. Value Health. 2003; 6: 466 – 73.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGundry JW, Comess KA, DeRook FA, Jorgenson D, Bardy GH. Comparison of naive sixth-grade children with trained professionals in the use of an automated external defibrillator. Circulation. 1999; 1703 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference48. 2000 United States Census Data. National Summary. Available at: http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/QTTable?ds_name=DEC_2000_SF1_U&geo_id=01000US&qr_name=DEC_2000_SF1_U_DP1. Accessed March 31, 2003.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference49. 2000 United States Census Data. City of Seattle. Available at: http://factfinder.census.gov/bf/_lang=en_vt_name=DEC_2000_PL_U_QTPL_geo_id=16000US5363000.html. Accessed March 31, 2003.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1525-1497.2003.21139.x.pdf
Size:
4.530MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.