Show simple item record

Input and Second Language Acquisition: The Roles of Frequency, Form, and Function Introduction to the Special Issue

dc.contributor.authorEllis, Nicken_US
dc.contributor.authorCollins, Lauraen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T19:26:40Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T19:26:40Z
dc.date.issued2009-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationELLIS, NICK; COLLINS, LAURA (2009). "Input and Second Language Acquisition: The Roles of Frequency, Form, and Function Introduction to the Special Issue." The Modern Language Journal 93(3): 329-335. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72584>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0026-7902en_US
dc.identifier.issn1540-4781en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72584
dc.format.extent78176 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.rights© 2009 by The Modern Language Journalen_US
dc.titleInput and Second Language Acquisition: The Roles of Frequency, Form, and Function Introduction to the Special Issueen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelLinguisticsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHumanitiesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherConcordia University TESL Centre, Department of Education 1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd. West Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1M8 Canada Email: laura.collins@concordia.caen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/72584/1/j.1540-4781.2009.00893.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00893.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe Modern Language Journalen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndersen, R. W. ( 1993 ). Four operating principles and input distribution as explanations for underdeveloped and mature morphological systems. In K. Hyltenstam & A. Viborg ( Eds. ), Progression and regression in language ( pp. 309 – 339 ). New York: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson, J. R. ( 1989 ). A rational analysis of human memory. In H. L. I. Roediger & F. I. M. Craik ( Eds. ), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving ( pp. 195 – 210 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson, J. R., & Schooler, L. J. ( 2000 ). The adaptive nature of memory. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik ( Eds. ), The Oxford handbook of memory ( pp. 557 – 570 ). London: Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBates, E., & MacWhinney, B. ( 1987 ). Competition, variation, and language learning. In B. MacWhinney ( Ed. ), Mechanisms of language acquisition ( pp. 157 – 193 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBernolet, S., Hartsuiker, R., & Pickering, M. ( 2007 ). Shared syntactic representations in bilinguals: Evidence for the role of word-order repetition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 931 – 949.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBock, J. K. ( 1986 ). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355 – 387.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyd, J., & Goldberg, A. E. ( 2009 ). Input effects within a constructionist framework. Modern Language Journal, 93, 418 – 429.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBybee, J., & Hopper, P. ( Eds. ). ( 2001 ). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBybee, J., & Thompson, S. ( 2000 ). Three frequency effects in syntax. Berkeley Linguistic Society, 23, 65 – 85.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCollins, C., Trofimovich, P., White, J., Cardoso, W., & Horst, M. ( 2009 ). Some input on the easy/difficult grammar question: An empirical study. Modern Language Journal, 93, 336 – 353.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElio, R., & Anderson, J. R. ( 1981 ). The effects of category generalizations and instance similarity on schema abstraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 7 ( 6 ), 397 – 417.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElio, R., & Anderson, J. R. ( 1984 ). The effects of information order and learning mode on schema abstraction. Memory & Cognition, 12, 20 – 30.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, N. C. ( 1998 ). Emergentism, connectionism and language learning. Language Learning, 48, 631 – 664.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, N. C. ( 2002 ). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143 – 188.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, N. C. ( 2003 ). Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long ( Eds. ), Handbook of second language acquisition ( pp. 33 – 68 ). Oxford: Blackwell.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, N. C. ( 2006a ). Cognitive perspectives on SLA: The associative cognitive CREED. AILA Review, 19, 100 – 121.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, N. C. ( 2006b ). Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 1 – 24.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, N. C. ( 2006c ). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in SLA: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 164 – 194.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, N. C. ( 2008a ). The dynamics of language use, language change, and first and second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 41, 232 – 249.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, N. C. ( 2008b ). Usage-based and form-focused language acquisition: The associative learning of constructions, learned-attention, and the limited L2 endstate. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis ( Eds. ), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition ( pp. 372 – 405 ). London: Routledge.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, N. C., & Cadierno, T. ( in press ). Constructing a second language. Special section. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, N. C., & Ferreira-Junior, F. ( 2009 ). Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and function. Modern Language Journal, 93, 370 – 385.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGass, S. M. ( 1997 ). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldberg, A. E. ( 1995 ). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldberg, A. E. ( 2003 ). Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 219 – 224.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldberg, A. E. ( 2006 ). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldberg, A. E., Casenhiser, D. M., & Sethuraman, N. ( 2004 ). Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics, 15, 289 – 316.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldschneider, J. M., & DeKeyser, R. ( 2001 ). Explaining the “natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition” in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 51, 1 – 50.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGries, S. T., & Wulff, S. ( 2005 ). Do foreign language learners also have constructions? Evidence from priming, sorting, and corpora. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3, 182 – 200.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIzquierdo, J. ( 2007 ). Multimedia environments in the foreign language classroom: Effects on the acquisition of the French perfective and imperfective distinction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLakoff, G. ( 1987 ). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLangacker, R. W. ( 1987 ). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLightbown, P. M. ( 1992 ). Getting quality input in the second/foreign language classroom. In C. Kramsch & S. McConnell-Ginet, ( Eds. ), Text and context: Cross-disciplinary and cross-cultural perspectives on language study ( pp. 187 – 197 ). Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacWhinney, B. ( 1987 ). The competition model. In B. MacWhinney ( Ed. ), Mechanisms of language acquisition ( pp. 249 – 308 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcDonough, K., & Kim, Y. ( 2009 ). Syntactic priming, type frequency, and EFL learners' production of  wh- questions. Modern Language Journal, 93, 386 – 398.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcDonough, K., & Trofimovich, P. ( 2008 ). Using priming methods in second language research. London: Routledge.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNinio, A. ( 1999 ). Pathbreaking verbs in syntactic development and the question of prototypical transitivity. Journal of Child Language, 26, 619 – 653.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNinio, A. ( 2006 ). Language and the learning curve: A new theory of syntactic developemnt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrtega, L., & Iberri-Shea, G. ( 2005 ). Longitudinal research in second language acquisition: Recent trends and future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 26 – 45.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePickering, M. J. ( 2006 ). The dance of dialogue. The Psychologist, 19, 734 – 737.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. C. ( 2006 ). Alignment as the basis for successful communication. Research on Language and Computation, 4, 203 – 228.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRescorla, R. A. ( 1968 ). Probability of shock in the presence and absence of CS in fear conditioning. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 66, 1 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. ( 1972 ). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy ( Eds. ), Classical conditioning II: Current theory and research ( pp. 64 – 99 ). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRobinson, P., & Ellis, N. C. ( Eds. ). ( 2008 ). A handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition. London: Routledge.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. ( 1975 ). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 192 – 233.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. ( 1976 ). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382 – 439.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShanks, D. R. ( 1995 ). The psychology of associative learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwain, M. ( 1988 ). Manipulating and complementing content teaching to maximize second language learning. TESL Canada Journal, 6 ( 1 ), 68 – 83.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTomasello, M. ( 2003 ). Constructing a language. Boston: Harvard University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliams, J. N., & Kuribara, C. ( 2008 ). Comparing a nativist and emergentist approach to the intial stage of SLA: An investigation of Japanese scrambling. Lingua, 118, 533 – 553.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWulff, S., Ellis, N. C., RÖmer, U., Bardovi-Harlig, K., & LeBlanc, C. ( 2009 ). The acquisition of tense–aspect: Converging evidence from corpora and telicity ratings. Modern Language Journal, 93, 354 – 369.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYear, J., & Gordon, P. ( 2009 ). Korean speakers' acquisition of the English ditransitive construction: The role of verb prototype, input distribution, and frequency. Modern Language Journal, 93, 389 – 417.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZipf, G. K. ( 1935 ). The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZyzik, E. ( 2006 ). Transitivity alternations and sequence learning: Insights from L2 Spanish production data. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 449 – 485.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.