Insurance Benefit Preferences of the Low-income Uninsured
dc.contributor.author | Danis, Marion | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Biddle, Andrea K. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Dorr Goold, Susan | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-06-01T19:30:25Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-06-01T19:30:25Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2002-02 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Danis, Marion; Biddle, Andrea K . ; Dorr Goold, Susan (2002). "Insurance Benefit Preferences of the Low-income Uninsured ." Journal of General Internal Medicine 17(2): 125-133. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72645> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0884-8734 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1525-1497 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72645 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=11841528&dopt=citation | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | A frequently cited obstacle to universal insurance is the lack of consensus about what benefits to offer in an affordable insurance package. This study was conducted to assess the feasibility of providing uninsured patients the opportunity to define their own benefit package within cost constraints. DESIGN: Structured group exercises SETTING: Community setting PARTICIPANTS: Uninsured individuals recruited from clinical and community settings in central North Carolina. MEASUREMENTS: Insurance choices were measured using a simulation exercise, CHAT (Choosing Healthplans All Together). Participants designed managed care plans, individually and as groups, by selecting from 15 service categories having varied levels of restriction (e.g., formulary, copayments) within the constraints of a fixed monthly premium comparable to the typical per member/per month managed care premium paid by U.S. employers. MAIN RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-four individuals who were predominantly male (70%), African American (55%), and socioeconomically disadvantaged (53% earned <$15,000 annually) participated in 22 groups and were able to design health benefit packages individually and in groups. All 22 groups chose to cover hospitalization, pharmacy, dental, and specialty care, and 21 groups chose primary care and mental health. Although individuals' choices differed from their groups' selections, 86% of participants were willing to abide by group choices. CONCLUSIONS: Groups of low-income uninsured individuals are able to identify acceptable benefit packages that are comparable in cost but differ in benefit design from managed care contracts offered to many U.S. employees today. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 591082 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3109 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Science, Inc. | en_US |
dc.rights | 2002 by the Society of General Internal Medicine | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Medically Uninsured | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Managed Care Programs | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Insurance, Health | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Medicaid | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Financing, Government | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Health Care Rationing | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Health Care Reform | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Health Policy | en_US |
dc.title | Insurance Benefit Preferences of the Low-income Uninsured | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Internal Medicine and Specialties | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 11841528 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/72645/1/j.1525-1497.2002.10609.x.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10609.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Journal of General Internal Medicine | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | 1. Bureau USC. Health insurance coverage. 1999 Vol. 2001: http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/hlthin99. Accessed February 26, 2001. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Grumbach K. Insuring the uninsured: time to end the aura of invisibility. JAMA. 2000; 284: 2114 – 6. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hellander I. A review of data on the health sector of the United States. Int J Health Serv. 2000; 30: 641 – 53. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Blumenthal D. Controlling health care expenditures. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344: 766 – 9. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Pauly M, Herring B. Expanding coverage via tax credits: trade-offs and outcomes. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001; 20: 9 – 26. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Feder J, Levitt L, O'Brien E, Rowland D. Covering the low-income uninsured: the case for expanding public programs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001; 20: 27 – 39. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kahn C III, Pollack R. Building a consensus for expanding health coverage. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001; 20: 40 – 8. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Davis K, Schoen C, Schoenbaum S. A 2020 vision for American health care. Arch Intern Med. 2000; 160: 3357 – 62. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kaiser E, Plaza C. Finance issue brief: insurance reform. Issue Brief Health Policy Tracking Serv. 1999; 6: 1 – 13. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Pear R. Governors offer ‘radical’ revision of Medicaid plan. New York Times. February 26, 2001: A1. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Goold S, Biddle A, Danis M. Choosing Healthplans All Together': A game to assess consumer values and preferences for health insurance. J of Gen Intern Med. 2000; 15: 68 – 9. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | 12. Milliman and Robertson Inc. HMO Intercompany Rate Survey. Brookfield, Wis: Milliman and Robertson, Inc.; 1997. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Duke R, Greenblat C. Principles and Practices of Gaming Simulation. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1981. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Berki S, Ashcroft M. HMO enrollment: who joins what and why. A review of the literature. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1980; 58: 588 – 632. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mechanic D, Ettel T, Davis D. Choosing among health insurance options: a study of new employees. Inquiry. 1990; 27: 14 – 23. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Grazier K. Factors affecting choice of health care plans. Health Serv Res. 1986; 20: 659 – 82. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Am Statistical Assoc. 1959; 58: 690 – 700. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | McNemar Q. Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions of percentages. Psychometrika. 1947; 12: 153 – 7. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hoy E, Wicks E, Forland R. A guide to facilitating consumer choice. Health Aff (Millwood). 1996; 15: 9 – 30. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Berghold L. Benefit design choices under managed care competition. Health Aff (Millwood). 1993; 12: 99 – 109. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Fleck L. Just caring: health reform and health care rationing. J Med Philos. 1994; 19: 435 – 43. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Steinberg Schone B, Cooper P. Assessing the impact of health plan choice. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001; 20: 267 – 75. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Jacobs L, Marmor T, Oberlander J. The Oregon Health Plan and the political paradox of rationing: what advocates and critics have claimed and what Oregon did. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1999; 24: 161 – 80. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Abelson J, Lomas J, Eyles J, Birch S, Veenstra G. Does the community want devolved authority? Results from deliberative polling in Ontario. Can Med Assoc J. 1995; 153: 403 – 12. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Dicker A, Armstrong D. Patients' views of priority setting in health care: an interview survey in one practice. BMJ. 1995; 311: 1137 – 9. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Busse R. Priority-setting and rationing in German health care. Health Policy. 1999; 50: 71 – 90. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lenaghan J. Involving the public in rationing decisions. The experience of citizen juries. Health Policy. 1999; 49: 45 – 61. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Eckerlund I, Ekhof J, Nathorst-Boos J. Patient preferences or cost effectiveness? Priorities are highly affected by introduction of economic dimension. Lakartidningen. 2000; 97: 5782 – 6. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bowling A, Jacobson B, Southgate L. Health service priorities. Soc Sci Med. 1993; 37: 851 – 7. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Fowler F, Berwick D, Roman A, Massagali M. Measuring public priorities for insurable health care. Med Care. 1994; 32: 625 – 39. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Satcher D. Mental Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Vol. 2001: Washington, D.C.: Department of Health and Human Services; 1999. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Levinson C, Druss B. The evolution of mental health parity in American politics. Admin Policy Ment Health. 2000; 28: 139 – 46. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Fronstin P. Sources of health insurance and characteristics of the uninsured: analysis of the March 1999 Current Population Survey. EBRI Issue Brief. 2000; 217: 1 – 26. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.