Comparison of rice straw and bamboo stick substrates in periphyton-based carp polyculture systems
dc.contributor.author | Rai, Sunila | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Yi, Yang | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wahab, Md Abdul | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Bart, Amrit N. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Diana, James S. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-06-01T19:30:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-06-01T19:30:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008-03 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Rai, Sunila; Yi, Yang; Wahab, Md Abdul; Bart, Amrit N; Diana, James S (2008). "Comparison of rice straw and bamboo stick substrates in periphyton-based carp polyculture systems." Aquaculture Research 39(5): 464-473. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72649> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1355-557X | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1365-2109 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72649 | |
dc.description.abstract | An experiment was conducted to compare rice straw mat and kanchi (bamboo sticks) as substrates in periphyton-based polyculture systems. The experiment had three treatments: (a) no substrate (control), (b) rice straw as a substrate (3 × 2.7 kg pond −1 ) and (c) kanchi as a substrate (390 kanchi pond −1 ). Fingerlings ( n =40) of rohu, Labeo rohita (24.5±0.5 g); mrigal, Cirrhinus mrigala (25.1±0.6 g); catla, Catla catla (25.8±0.5 g); common carp, Cyprinus carpio (27.6±0.6 g), and silver carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix (30.4±0.9 g) were stocked at a 3:2:2:2:1 ratio and cultured for 90 days. There were no differences in the number of plankton, periphyton and macro-zoobenthos among the treatments. The total plate count of bacteria was higher in the rice straw treatment (41 320 million cfu m −2 ) than that in the kanchi treatment (11 780 million cfu m −2 ). Growth and the final mean weight of rohu, catla and common carp were higher in the substrate treatments than those in the control. Rice straw and kanchi treatment, respectively, resulted in 38% and 47% higher combined total weight gain over control. Gross margin analysis showed that rice straw treatment resulted in more profit than the control and kanchi treatment. Therefore, rice straw has the potential to be used to increase production in the low-input rural aquaculture. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 168264 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3109 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd | en_US |
dc.rights | Journal Compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Rice Straw | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Kanchi | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Substrate | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Periphyton-based Polyculture System | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of rice straw and bamboo stick substrates in periphyton-based carp polyculture systems | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Science | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Aquaculture and Aquatic Resources Management, School of Environment, Resources and Development, Asian Institute of Technology, Pathumthani, Thailand | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | College of Aqua-Life Science and Technology, Shanghai Fisheries University, Shanghai, China | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Faculty of Fisheries, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/72649/1/j.1365-2109.2008.01898.x.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2008.01898.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Aquaculture Research | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | APHA. ( 1980 ) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 15th edn. American Public Health Association, American Water Work Association and Water Pollution Control Federation, Washington, DC, USA. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Azim M.E., Wahab M.A., Van Dam A.A., Beveridge M.C.M. & Verdegem M.C.J. ( 2001a ) The potential of periphyton based culture of two Indian major carps, rohu, Labeo rohita (Hamilton) and gonia, Labeo gonius (Linnaeus). Aquaculture Research 32, 209 – 216. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Azim M.E., Wahab M.A., Van Dam A.A., Beveridge M.C.M., Huisman E.A. & Verdegem M.C.J. ( 2001b ) Optimization of stocking ratios of two Indian major carps, rohu ( Labeo rohita Ham.) and catla ( Catla catla Ham.) in a periphyton-based aquaculture system. Aquaculture 203, 33 – 49. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Azim M.E., Verdegem M.C.J., Khatun H., Wahab M.A., Van Dam A.A. & Beveridge M.C.M. ( 2002a ) A comparison of fertilization, feeding and three periphyton substrates for increasing fish production in freshwater pond aquaculture in Bangladesh. Aquaculture 212, 227 – 243. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Azim M.E., Verdegem M.C.J., Rahman M.M., Wahab M.A., Van Dam A.A. & Beveridge M.C.M. ( 2002b ) Evaluation of polyculture with Indian major carps in periphyton-based pond. Aquaculture 213, 131 – 149. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Azim M.E., Rahman M.M., Wahab M.A., Asaeda T., Little D.C. & Verdegem M.C.J. ( 2004 ) Periphyton-based pond polyculture system: a bioeconomic comparison of on-farm and on-station trials. Aquaculture 242, 381 – 396. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bellinger E.G. ( 1992 ) A Key to Common Algae. The Institute of Water and Environmental Management, London, UK. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Chakrabarty N.M. ( 1998 ) Biology, Culture and Production of Indian Major Carp – A Review. Narendra Publishing House, Delhi, India. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Dharmaraj M., Manissery J.K. & Keshavnath P. ( 2002 ) Effects of a biodegradable substrate, sugarcane bagasse and supplementary feed on growth and production of fringe-lipped peninsular carp, Labeo fimbriatus (Bloch). Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria 32, 137 – 144. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kadir M.A., Wahab M.A., Milstein A., Hossain M.A. & Seraji M.T.I., ( 2007 ) Effects of silver carp and the small indigenous fish mola Amblypharyngodon mola and punti Puntius sophore on fish polyculture production. Aquaculture 273, 520 – 531. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Keshavnath P., Gangadhar B., Ramesh T.J., Van Rooij J.M., Beveredge M.C.M., Baird D.J., Verdegem M.C.J. & Van Dam A.A. ( 2001 ) Use of artificial substrates to enhance production of freshwater herbivorous fish in pond culture. Aquaculture Research 32, 189 – 197. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Miller M.W. & Falace A. ( 2000 ) Evaluation methods for trophic resource factor-nutrients, primary production, and associated assemblages. In: Artificial Reef Evaluation with Application to Natural Habitats ( ed. by W. Seaman Jr. ), pp. 95 – 126. CRC Press, Florida, USA. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Moriarty D.J.W. ( 1997 ) The role of microorganisms in aquaculture ponds. Aquaculture 151, 333 – 349. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mridula R.M., Manissary J.K., Keshavnath P., Shankar K.M., Nandesha M.C. & Rajesh K.M. ( 2003 ) Water quality, biofilm production and growth of fringe-lipped carp ( Labeo fimbriatus ) in tanks provided with two solid substrates. Aquaculture 87, 263 – 267. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mridula R.M., Manissary J.K., Keshavnath P., Shankar K.M., Nandesha M.C. & Rajesh K.M. ( 2005 ) Effects of paddy straw and sugarcane bagasse on water quality, bacterial biofilm production and growth and survival of rohu, Labeo rohita (Hamilton). Aquaculture Research 36, 635 – 642. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Needham J.G. & Needham P.R. ( 1962 ) A Guide to the Study of Fresh-Water Biology. Holden-Day, San Francisco, USA. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | NFEP ( 1997 ) Production enhancement of the Indian major carp, Labeo rohita (hamilton) using bamboo trimmings as a substrate for the growth of periphyton. NFEP Paper No. 10. Northwest Fisheries Extension Project, Parbatipur, Dinajpur, Bangladesh. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Rahman M.M., Verdegem M.C.J., Nagelkerke L.A.J., Wahab M.A., Milstein A. & Verreth J.A.J. ( 2006 ) Growth production and food preference of rohu Labeo rohita (H) in monoculture and in polyculture with common carp Cyprinus carpio (L.) under fed and non-fed ponds. Aquaculture 257, 359 – 372. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ramesh M.R., Shankar K.M., Mohan C.V. & Varghese T.J. ( 1999 ) Comparison of three plant substrates for enhancing carp growth through bacterial biofilm. Aquaculture Engineering 19, 119 – 131. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Raveh A. & Avnimelech Y. ( 1979 ) Total Nitrogen Analysis in Water, Soil and Plant Material with Persulfate Digestion. Water Research 13, 911 – 912. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Van Dam A.A., Beveridge M.C.M., Azim M.E. & Verdegem M.C.J. ( 2002 ) The potential of fish production based on periphyton. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 12, 1 – 31. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wahab M.A., Azim M.E., Ali M.H., Beveridge M.C.M. & Khan S. ( 1999 ) The potential of periphyton based culture of the native major carp calbaush, Labeo calbasu (Hamilton). Aquaculture Research 30, 409 – 419. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ward H.B. & Whipple G.C. ( 1959 ) Freshwater Biology. John Willey and sons, New York, USA. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wetzel R.G. ( 1983 ) Attached algal-substrata interactions; fact or myth, and when and how? In: Periphyton of Freshwater Ecosystems ( ed. by R.G. Wetzel ), pp. 207 – 215. Dr. W. Junk publishers, The Hague, the Netherlands. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Yi Y., Lin C.K. & Diana J.S. ( 2003 ) Techniques to mitigate clay turbidity problems in fertilized earthen fish ponds. Aquaculture Engineering 27, 39 – 51. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.