Show simple item record

Step-down from multiple- to single-dose proton pump inhibitors (PPIs): a prospective study of patients with heartburn or acid regurgitation completely relieved with PPIs

dc.contributor.authorInadomi, John M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMcIntyre, Lisaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBernard, Latoyaen_US
dc.contributor.authorFendrick, A. Marken_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T19:31:59Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T19:31:59Z
dc.date.issued2003-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationInadomi, John M.; McIntyre, Lisa; Bernard, Latoya; Fendrick, A. Mark (2003). "Step-down from multiple- to single-dose proton pump inhibitors (PPIs): a prospective study of patients with heartburn or acid regurgitation completely relieved with PPIs." The American Journal of Gastroenterology 98(9): 1940-1944. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72670>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0002-9270en_US
dc.identifier.issn1572-0241en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72670
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=14499769&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractManagement costs for gastroesophageal reflux disease are high because of the expensive medications used for maintenance therapy. Previous studies have illustrated the success of step-down from proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) to less-expensive therapy once symptoms have abated. This study was conducted to determine whether patients requiring greater than single-dose PPI for initial symptom resolution could be stepped-down to single-dose PPI and whether this intervention decreased costs or adversely affected quality of life. Methods Consecutive patients in whom greater than single-dose PPI had completely alleviated reflux-type symptoms (heartburn or acid regurgitation) were recruited through the use of pharmacy records of PPI prescriptions. Eligible subjects completed baseline demographic information and quality-of-life surveys and were stepped-down to single-dose PPI (lansoprazole 30 mg or omeprazole 20 mg daily). Follow-up continued for 6 months or until subjects reported recurrence of reflux-type symptoms, at which point PPIs were reinstituted at the dose that had originally alleviated the subjects' symptoms. The primary outcome was the proportion of subjects in whom step-down was successful, defined as no recurrence of reflux-type symptoms on single-dose PPI. Results A total of 117 subjects enrolled in the study; all were followed to the primary endpoint. 79.5% did not report recurrent symptoms of heartburn or acid regurgitation during the 6 months after step-down to single-dose PPI. Logistic regression revealed that longer duration of PPI use before study enrollment was associated with greater likelihood of symptom recurrence with step-down. Although quality of life was not significantly altered, dyspepsia (excluding reflux-type symptoms) increased. Overall costs of management were reduced. Conclusion The majority of patients rendered asymptomatic on greater than single-dose PPI might be subsequently stepped-down to single-dose therapy without recurrence of reflux-type symptoms. This intervention can decrease management costs without adversely affecting quality of life.en_US
dc.format.extent55626 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Science Incen_US
dc.rights2003 by Am. Coll. of Gastroenterologyen_US
dc.titleStep-down from multiple- to single-dose proton pump inhibitors (PPIs): a prospective study of patients with heartburn or acid regurgitation completely relieved with PPIsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Veterans Affairs Center for Practice Management and Outcomes Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumConsortium for Health Outcomes, Innovation, and Cost-Effectiveness Studies, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid14499769en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/72670/1/j.1572-0241.2003.07665.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07665.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe American Journal of Gastroenterologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreference1. Pharmacy Benefits Management Strategic Health Group. Contract adherence reports national reports: Q4FY99. Washington, DC: Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, 2000.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSontag S. Gastroesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1993; 7: 293 312.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBell N., Hunt R. Role of gastric acid suppression in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Gut 1992; 33: 118 124.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWesdorp I., Dekker W., Festen H.P. Efficacy of famotidine 20 mg twice a day versus 40 mg twice a day in the treatment of erosive or ulcerative reflux esophagitis. Dig Dis Sci 1993; 38: 2287 2293.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceInadomi J.M., Jamal R., Murata G.H, et al.. Step-down management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology 2001; 121: 1095 1100.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNyren O., Adami H., Bates S, et al.. Absence of therapeutic benefit from antacids or cimetidine in non-ulcer dyspepsia. N Engl J Med 1986; 314: 339 343.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDobrilla G., Comberlato M., Steele A., Vallaperta P. Drug treatment of functional dyspepsia. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. J Clin Gastroenterol 1989; 11: 169 177.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTalley N.J., Meineche-Schmidt V., Pare P, et al.. Efficacy of omeprazole in functional dyspepsia: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (the Bond and Opera studies). Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1998; 12: 1055 1065.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarup P.G., Wetterhus S., Osnes M., Ulshagen K. Ranitidine effectively relieves symptoms in a subset of patients with functional dyspepsia. Scand J Gastroenterol 1997; 32: 755 759.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTalley N.J., McNeil D., Hayden A., Piper D.W. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial of cimetidine and pirenzepine in nonulcer dyspepsia. Gastroenterology 1986; 91: 149 156.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceColwell H.H., Mathias S.D., Pasta D.J, et al.. Development of a health-related quality of life questionnaire for individuals with gastroesophageal reflux disease. A validation study. Dig Dis Sci 1999; 44: 1376 1383.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeduzzi P., Concato J., Kemper E, et al.. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49: 1373 1379.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeduzzi P., Concato J., Feinstein A.R., Holford T.R. Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis. II. Accuracy and precision of regression estimates. J Clin Epidemiol 1995; 48: 1503 1510.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceConcato J., Peduzzi P., Holford T.R., Feinstein A.R. Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards analysis. I. Background, goals, and general strategy. J Clin Epidemiol 1995; 48: 1495 1501.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHallerback B., Unge P., Carling L, et al.. Omeprazole or ranitidine in long-term treatment of reflux esophagitis. The Scandinavian Clinics for United Research Group. Gastroenterology 1994; 107: 1305 1311.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVigneri S., Termini R., Leandro G, et al.. A comparison of five maintenance therapies for reflux esophagitis. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1106 1110.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFass R., Pulliam G., Johnson C, et al.. Symptom severity and oesophageal chemosensitivity to acid in older and young patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux. Age Ageing 2000; 29: 125 130.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.