Show simple item record

Health Care System Accessibility

dc.contributor.authorSteinberg, Annie G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBarnett, Stevenen_US
dc.contributor.authorMeador, Helen E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWiggins, Erin A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorZazove, Philipen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T19:34:43Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T19:34:43Z
dc.date.issued2006-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationSteinberg, Annie G.; Barnett, Steven; Meador, Helen E.; Wiggins, Erin A.; Zazove, Philip (2006). "Health Care System Accessibility." Journal of General Internal Medicine 21(3): 260-266. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72715>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0884-8734en_US
dc.identifier.issn1525-1497en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72715
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=16499543&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractPeople who are deaf use health care services differently than the general population; little research has been carried out to understand the reasons. OBJECTIVE : To better understand the health care experiences of deaf people who communicate in American Sign Language. DESIGN : Qualitative analyses of focus group discussions in 3 U.S. cities. PARTICIPANTS : Ninety-one deaf adults who communicate primarily in American Sign Language. MEASUREMENTS : We collected information about health care communication and perceptions of clinicians' attitudes. We elicited stories of both positive and negative encounters, as well as recommendations for improving health care. RESULTS : Communication difficulties were ubiquitous. Fear, mistrust, and frustration were prominent in participants' descriptions of health care encounters. Positive experiences were characterized by the presence of medically experienced certified interpreters, health care practitioners with sign language skills, and practitioners who made an effort to improve communication. Many participants acknowledged limited knowledge of their legal rights and did not advocate for themselves. Some participants believed that health care practitioners should learn more about sociocultural aspects of deafness. CONCLUSIONS : Deaf people report difficulties using health care services. Physicians can facilitate change to improve this. Future research should explore the perspective of clinicians when working with deaf people, ways to improve communication, and the impact of programs that teach deaf people self-advocacy skills and about their legal rights.en_US
dc.format.extent110424 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.rights© 2006 by the Society of General Internal Medicine. All rights reserveden_US
dc.subject.otherDeafnessen_US
dc.subject.otherSign Languageen_US
dc.subject.otherPhysician-patient Relationsen_US
dc.subject.otherHearing Impaired Personsen_US
dc.subject.otherCommunicationen_US
dc.titleHealth Care System Accessibilityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA ;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartments of Psychiatry and Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA ;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA ;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDeafness and Family Communication Center, Children's Seashore House of The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid16499543en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/72715/1/j.1525-1497.2006.00340.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00340.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of General Internal Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarnett S, Franks P. Deaf adults and healthcare utilization: relationship with age at onset of deafness. Health Services Res. 2002; 37: 105 – 20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZazove P, Niemann LC, Gorenflo DW, et al. The health status and health care utilization of deaf and hard-of-hearing persons. Arch Fam Med. 1993; 2: 745 – 52.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSteinberg A, Sullivan V, Loew R. Cultural and linguistic barriers to mental health service access: the deaf consumer's perspective. Am J Psychiatry. 1998; 155: 982 – 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWitte TN, Kuzel AJ. Elderly deaf patients' health care experiences. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2000; 13: 17 – 22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarnett S. Clinical and cultural issues in caring for deaf people. Fam Med. 1999; 31: 17 – 22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePadden C. The deaf community and the culture of deaf people. In: Wilcox S, ed. American Deaf Culture: An Anthology. Burtonsville, MD: Linstok Press; 1989: 1 – 16.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolt JA. Stanford Achievement Test—8th edition: reading comprehension subgroup results. Am Ann Deaf. 1993; 138: 172 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference8.  Folio VIEWS. Provo, UT: Folio Corp; 1995.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcEwen E, Anton-Culver H. The medical communication of deaf patients. J Fam Pract. 1988; 26: 289 – 91.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEbert DA, Heckerling PS. Communication with deaf patients: knowledge, beliefs, and practices of physicians. JAMA. 1995; 273: 227 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSteinberg A. Issues in providing mental health services to hearing-impaired persons. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1991; 42: 380 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHammer SG. The cost of treating deaf and hard-of-hearing patients [letter]. Am Fam Physician. 1998; 58: 659.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKulback S. Communicating with deaf patients [letter]. JAMA. 1995; 274: 795.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNovak D. And you thought the CLIA regs were absurd. Med Econ. 1995; 72: 93.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacKinney TG, Walters D, Bird GL, Nattinger AB. Improvements in preventive care and communication for deaf patients: results of a novel primary health care program. J Gen Intern Med. 1995; 10: 133 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRalston E, Zazove P, Gorenflo DW. Physicians' attitudes and beliefs about deaf patients. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1996; 9: 167 – 73.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCulhane-Pera K, Reif C, Egli E, Baker N, Kassenkert R. A curriculum for multicultural education in family medicine. Fam Med. 1997; 29: 719 – 23.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRichards J, Harmer L, Pollard P, Pollard RQ. Deaf Strong Hospital: an exercise in cross-cultural communication for first year medical students. J Univ Rochester Med Center. 1999; 10: 5 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith M, Hasnip H. The lessons of deafness: deafness awareness and communication skills training with medical students. Med Educ. 1991; 25: 319 – 21.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarnett S. Cross cultural communication with patients who use American Sign Language. Fam Med. 2002; 34: 376 – 82.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarnett S. Communication with deaf and hard-of-hearing people: a guide for medical education. Acad Med. 2002; 77: 694 – 700.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLock E. A workshop for medical students on deafness and hearing impairments. Acad Med. 2003; 78: 1229 – 34.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarnett S, Franks P. Telephone ownership and deaf people: implications for telephone surveys. Am J Public Health. 1999; 89: 1754 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParsons JA, Baum S, Johnson TP. Inclusion of disabled populations in social surveys: review and recommendations. University of Illinois at Chicago, Survey Research Laboratory, December 2000.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIezzoni LI, O'Day BL, Killeen M, Harker H. Communicating about health care: observations from persons who are deaf or hard of hearing. Ann Intern Med. 2004; 140: 356 – 62.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.