View Item 

Show simple item record

Organ donation and utilization in the United States, 2004
dc.contributor.authorDelmonico, Francis L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSheehy, Ellenen_US
dc.contributor.authorMarks, William H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBaliga, Prabhakaren_US
dc.contributor.authorMcGowan, Joshua J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMagee, John C.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T19:35:34Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T19:35:34Z
dc.date.issued2005-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationDelmonico, Francis L.; Sheehy, Ellen; Marks, William H.; Baliga, Prabhakar; McGowan, Joshua J.; Magee, John C. (2005). "Organ donation and utilization in the United States, 2004." American Journal of Transplantation 5(4p2): 862-873. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72729>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-6135en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-6143en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72729
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=15760414&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent150984 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherMunksgaard International Publishersen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rightsBlackwell Munksgaard 2005en_US
dc.subject.otherDeceased Donorsen_US
dc.subject.otherDonation Ratesen_US
dc.subject.otherLiving Donorsen_US
dc.subject.otherOPOsen_US
dc.subject.otherOrgan Donationen_US
dc.subject.otherOrgan Procurementen_US
dc.subject.otherSRTRen_US
dc.titleOrgan donation and utilization in the United States, 2004en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumScientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherAssociation of Organ Procurement Organizations, Newton, MAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherSwedish Medical Center, Seattle, WAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherMedical University of South Carolina (MUSC) Medical Center, Charleston, SCen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherScientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, University Renal Research and Education Association, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.identifier.pmid15760414en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/72729/1/j.1600-6135.2005.00832.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-6135.2005.00832.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Transplantationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDickinson DM, Dykstra DM, Levine GM, Li S, Welch JC, Webb RL. Transplant data: sources, collection, and research considerations, 2004. Am J Transplant. 2005; 5 ( Part 2 ): 850 – 861.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchaubel DE, Dykstra DM, Murray S et al. SRTR Report on the state of transplantation: analytical approaches for Transplant Research, 2004. Am J Transplant. 2005; 5 ( Part 2 ): 950 – 957.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference3.  Health care at the crossroads: Strategies for narrowing the organ donation gap and protecting patients: JCAHO.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiminoff LA, Gordon N, Hewlett J, Arnold RM. Factors influencing families' consent for donation of solid organs for transplantation. JAMA 2001; 286: 71 – 77.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiminoff LA, Lawrence RH, Arnold RM. Comparison of black and white families' experiences and perceptions regarding organ donation requests. Crit Care Med 2003; 31: 146 – 151.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSheehy E, Conrad SL, Brigham LE et al. Estimating the number of potential organ donors in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 667 – 674.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorgan SE, Miller JK, Arasaratnam LA. Similarities and differences between African Americans and Europeans Americans' attitudes, knowledge, and willingness to communicate about organ donation. J Appl Soc Psychol 2003; 23: 693 – 714.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavidson MN, Devney P. Attitudinal barriers to organ donation among black Americans. Transplant Proc 1991; 23: 2531 – 2532.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYancey AK, Coppo P, Kawanishi Y. Progress in availability of donors of color: the National Marrow Donor Program. Transplant Proc 1997; 29: 3760 – 3765.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHall LE, Callender CO, Yeager CL, Barber JB, Jr., Dunston GM, Pinn-Wiggins VW. Organ donation in blacks: the next frontier. Transplant Proc 1991; 23: 2500 – 2504.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArnason WB. Directed donation. The relevance of race. Hastings Cent Rep 1991; 21: 13 – 19.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcNamara P, Guadagnoli E, Evanisko MJ et al. Correlates of support for organ donation among three ethnic groups. Clin Transplant 1999; 13 ( 1 Pt 1 ): 45 – 50.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiminoff LA, Arnold R. Increasing organ donation in the African-American community: altruism in the face of an untrustworthy system. Ann Intern Med 1999; 130: 607 – 609.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpigner C, Weaver M, Pineda M et al. Race/ethnic-based opinions on organ donation and transplantation among teens: preliminary results. Transplant Proc 1999; 31: 1347 – 1348.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParisi N, Katz I. Attitudes toward posthumous organ donation and commitment to donate. Health Psychol 1986; 5: 565 – 580.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSanner M. Attitudes toward organ donation and transplantation. A model for understanding reactions to medical procedures after death. Soc Sci Med 1994; 38: 1141 – 1152.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorgan SE, Cannon T. African Americans' knowledge about organ donation: closing the gap with more effective persuasive message strategies. J Natl Med Assoc 2003; 95: 1066 – 1071.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorgan SE, Miller J. Communicating about gifts of life: the effect of knowledge, attitudes, and altruism on behavior and behavioral intentions regarding organ donation. J Appl Commun Res 2002; 30: 163 – 178.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLuskin RS, Delmonico FL. Assessing organ donation from the dead should not be done by reporting a census of the living. Am J Transplant 2003; 3: 1185 – 1187.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosengard BR, Feng S, Alfrey EJ et al. Report of the Crystal City meeting to maximize the use of organs recovered from the cadaver donor. Am J Transplant 2002; 2: 701 – 711.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLloyd-Jones H, Wheeldon DR, Smith JA, Potter CD, Wallwork J, Large SR. An approach to the retrieval of thoracic organs for transplantation. AORN J 1996; 63: 416 – 423, 425 – 426.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEdwards EB, Posner MP, Maluf DG, Kauffman HM. Reasons for non-use of recovered kidneys: the effect of donor glomerulosclerosis and creatinine clearance on graft survival. Transplantation 2004; 77: 1411 – 1415.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePapadimitriou JC, Coale R, Farney A et al. Biopsy of the marginal kidney donor: correlation of histology with outcome. Transplant Proc 2004; 36: 742 – 744.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVistoli F, Boggi U, Vanadia Bartolo T et al. Kidney transplantation from donors aged more than 65 years. Transplant Proc 2004; 36: 481 – 484.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHowie AJ, Ferreira MA, Lipkin GW, Adu D. Measurement of chronic damage in the donor kidney and graft survival. Transplantation 1995; 60: 334 – 339. Transplantation 2004; 77: 1058 – 1065.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGaber LW, Moore LW, Alloway RR, Amiri MH, Vera SR, Gaber AO. Glomerulosclerosis as a determinant of posttransplant function of older donor renal allografts. Transplant 1995; 60: 334 – 339.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVilca Melendez H, Rela M, Murphy G, Heaton N. Assessment of graft function before liver transplantation: quest for the lost ark? Transplantation 2000; 70: 560 – 565.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOellerich M, Armstrong VW. The MEGX test: a tool for the real-time assessment of hepatic function. Ther Drug Monit 2001; 23: 81 – 92.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRull R, Vidal O, Momblan D, Gonzalez FX, Lopez-Boado MA, Fuster J. Evaluation of potential liver donors: Limits imposed by donor variables in liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2003; 9: 389 – 393.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBusquets J, Xiol X, Figueras J et al. The impact of donor age on liver transplantation: influence of donor age on early liver function and on subsequent patient and graft survival. Transplantation 2001; 71: 1765 – 1771.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDebRoy M, Dykstra DM, Robert JP et al. The impact of cold ischemic time and donor age on liver transplant outcome. Am J Transplant 2003; 3 ( Suppl. 5 ): 451.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLoinaz C, Gonzalez EM. Marginal donors in liver transplantation. Hepato-Gastroenterology 2000; 47: 256 – 263, 2000.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarsman WA, Wiesner RH, Rodriguez L et al. Use of fatty donor liver is associated with diminished early patient and graft survival. Transplantation 1996; 62: 1246 – 1251.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFishbein TM, Fiel MI, Emre S et al. Use of livers with microvesicular fat safely expands the donor pool. Transplantation 1997; 64: 248 – 251.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarmer DG, Anselmo DM, Ghobrial RM et al. Liver transplantation for fulminant hepatic failure: experience with more than 200 patients over a 17-year period. Ann Surg 2003; 237: 666 – 676.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMerion RM, Schaubel DE, Dykstra DM, Freeman RB, Port FK, Wolfe RA. The survival benefit of liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 307 – 313.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1600-6135.2005.00832.x.pdf
Size:
147.4KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.