View Item 

Show simple item record

Restoring Rivers One Reach at a Time: Results from a Survey of U.S. River Restoration Practitioners

dc.contributor.authorBernhardt, Emily S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSudduth, Elizabeth B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPalmer, Margaret A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAllan, J. Daviden_US
dc.contributor.authorMeyer, Judy L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAlexander, Gretchen G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFollastad-Shah, Jenniferen_US
dc.contributor.authorHassett, Brookeen_US
dc.contributor.authorJenkinson, Robin G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLave, Rebeccaen_US
dc.contributor.authorRumps, Jeanneen_US
dc.contributor.authorPagano, Lauraen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T19:46:56Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T19:46:56Z
dc.date.issued2007-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationBernhardt, Emily S.; Sudduth, Elizabeth B.; Palmer, Margaret A.; Allan, J. David; Meyer, Judy L.; Alexander, Gretchen; Follastad-Shah, Jennifer; Hassett, Brooke; Jenkinson, Robin; Lave, Rebecca; Rumps, Jeanne; Pagano, Laura (2007). "Restoring Rivers One Reach at a Time: Results from a Survey of U.S. River Restoration Practitioners." Restoration Ecology 15(3): 482-493. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72915>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1061-2971en_US
dc.identifier.issn1526-100Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72915
dc.format.extent263782 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.rights2007 Society for Ecological Restoration Internationalen_US
dc.subject.otherEvaluationen_US
dc.subject.otherInterviewsen_US
dc.subject.otherMonitoringen_US
dc.subject.otherNRRSSen_US
dc.subject.otherRiver Restorationen_US
dc.subject.otherSuccessen_US
dc.titleRestoring Rivers One Reach at a Time: Results from a Survey of U.S. River Restoration Practitionersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationum  School of Natural Resources & Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationother  Department of biology, BOX 90338, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationother  Departments of Entomology and Biology, Plant Sciences Building, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationother  Institute of Ecology, 517 Biological Sciences Bldg., University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationother  Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, P.O. Box 38, Solomons, MD 20688, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationother  Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationother  Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationother  Department of Geography, McCone Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationother  Center for Ecohydraulic Research, College of Engineering, 322 E. Front St., Suite 340, University of Idaho, Boise, ID, U.S.A.en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/72915/1/j.1526-100X.2007.00244.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00244.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceRestoration Ecologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaruch, Y. 1999. Response rate in academic studies—a comparative analysis. Human Relations 52: 421 – 438.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBash, J. S., and C. M. Ryan. 2002. Stream restoration and enhancement projects: is anyone monitoring? Environmental Management 29: 877 – 885.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBernhardt, E. S., M. A. Palmer, J. D. Allan, G. Alexander, K. Barnas, S. Brooks, et al. 2005. Synthesizing US river restoration efforts. Science 308: 636 – 637.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDahm, C. N., K. W. Cummins, H. M. Valett, and R. L. Coleman. 1995. An ecosystem view of the restoration of the Kissimmee River. Restoration Ecology 3: 225 – 238.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDowns, P. W., and G. M. Kondolf. 2002. Post-project appraisals in adaptive management of river channel restoration. Environmental Management 29: 477 – 496.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFalk, D. A., J. B. Zedler, and M. A. Palmer, editors. 2006. Foundations of restoration ecology. Island Press, Washington, D.C.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrary, R. B. 1985. Multiple-choice versus free-response—a simulation study. Journal of Educational Measurement 22: 21 – 31.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeppner, P. P., J. D. M. Kivlighan, and B. E. Wampold. 1992. Research design in counseling. Brooks Cole, Pacific Grove, California.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHobbs, R. J. 2005. The future of restoration ecology: challenges and opportunities. Restoration Ecology 13: 239 – 241.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKondolf, G. M. 1995. 5 elements for effective evaluation of stream restoration. Restoration Ecology 3: 133 – 136.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKondolf, G. M., and E. R. Micheli. 1995. Evaluating stream restoration projects. Environmental Management 19: 1 – 15.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeong, F. T. L., and J. T. Austin, editors. 1996. The psychology research handbook. Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoerke, A. H., and G. A. Lamberti. 2004. Restoring stream ecosystems: lessons from a midwestern state. Restoration Ecology 12: 327 – 334.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNRC (National Research Council ). 1992. Restoration of aquatic ecosystems: science, technology, and public policy. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePalmer, M. A., and J. D. Allan. 2005. Restoring rivers. Issues in Science and Technology 22: 40 – 48.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePalmer, M. A., E. S. Bernhardt, J. D. Allan, P. S. Lake, G. Alexander, S. Brooks, et al. 2005. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 208 – 217.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePedroli, B., G. de Blust, K. van Looy, and S. van Rooij. 2001. Setting targets in strategies for river restoration. Landscape Ecology 17: 5 – 18.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePostel, S., and B. Richter. 2003. Rivers for life: managing waters for people and nature. Island Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoni, P., T. J. Beechie, R. E. Bilby, F. E. Leonetti, M. M. Pollock, and G. R. Pess. 2002. A review of stream restoration techniques and a hierarchical strategy for prioritizing restoration in Pacific northwest watersheds. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22: 1 – 20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoni, P., K. Hanson, T. Beechie, G. Pess, M. Pollock, and D. M. Bartley. 2006. Habitat rehabilitation for inland fisheries. Global review of effectiveness and guidance for rehabilitation of freshwater ecosystems. No. 484, FAO, Rome, Italy.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRuiz-Jaen, M. C., and T. Mitchell Aide. 2005. Restoration success: how is it being measured? Restoration Ecology 13: 569 – 577.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShields, F. D., C. M. Cooper, S. S. Knight, and M. T. Moore. 2003. Stream corridor restoration research: a long and winding road. Ecological Engineering 20: 441 – 454.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSudduth, E. B., J. L. Meyer, E. S. Bernhardt. 2007. Stream restoration practices in the Southeastern United States. Restoration Ecology 15: 572 – 583.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWohl, E., P. L. Angermeier, E. Bledsoe, G. M. Kondolf, L. MacDonnell, D. M. Merritt, M. A. Palmer, N. L. Poff, and D. Tarboton. 2005. River restoration. Water Resources Research 41: W10301.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 2000. National Water Quality Inventory, Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water. EPA-841-F-02-003, http://www.epa.gov/305b.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYu, J., and H. Cooper. 1983. A quantitative review of research design effects on response rates to questionnaires. Journal of Marketing Research 20: 36 – 44.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1526-100X.2007.00244.x.pdf
Size:
257.5KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.