Show simple item record

Systematics and conservation of the hook-billed kite including the island taxa from Cuba and Grenada

dc.contributor.authorJohnson, J. A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorThorstrom, R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMindell, D. P.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T19:47:22Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T19:47:22Z
dc.date.issued2007-08en_US
dc.identifier.citationJohnson, J. A.; Thorstrom, R.; Mindell, D. P. (2007). "Systematics and conservation of the hook-billed kite including the island taxa from Cuba and Grenada." Animal Conservation 10(3): 349-359. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72922>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1367-9430en_US
dc.identifier.issn1469-1795en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/72922
dc.description.abstractTaxonomic uncertainties within the genus Chondrohierax stem from the high degree of variation in bill size and plumage coloration throughout the geographic range of the single recognized species, hook-billed kite Chondrohierax uncinatus . These uncertainties impede conservation efforts as local populations have declined throughout much of its geographic range from the Neotropics in Central America to northern Argentina and Paraguay, including two island populations on Cuba and Grenada, and it is not known whether barriers to dispersal exist between any of these areas. Here, we present mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA; cytochrome B and NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2) phylogenetic analyses of Chondrohierax , with particular emphasis on the two island taxa (from Cuba, Chondrohierax uncinatus wilsonii and from Grenada, Chondrohierax uncinatus mirus ). The mtDNA phylogenetic results suggest that hook-billed kites on both islands are unique; however, the Cuban kite has much greater divergence estimates (1.8–2.0% corrected sequence divergence) when compared with the mainland populations than does the Grenada hook-billed kite (0.1–0.3%). Our findings support species status for the Cuban form, as Chondrohierax wilsonii , and subspecific status for the Grenada form. For mainland taxa, we do not find support for the currently recognized subspecies Chondrohierax uncinatus aquilonis in western Mexico, but we do find evidence for a genetic subdivision between populations in Central and South America, a difference previously unsuspected. The results of this study help identify conservation priorities associated with these unique Neotropical raptors. This information is of immediate interest because the Cuban kite has not been reliably seen since 1992, and <50 hook-billed kites currently inhabit Grenada.en_US
dc.format.extent218357 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights© 2007 The Zoological Society of Londonen_US
dc.subject.otherPhylogeneticsen_US
dc.subject.otherCoalescenceen_US
dc.subject.otherDivergenceen_US
dc.subject.otherConservationen_US
dc.subject.otherCryptic Speciesen_US
dc.subject.otherChondrohieraxen_US
dc.titleSystematics and conservation of the hook-billed kite including the island taxa from Cuba and Grenadaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationum2 Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationother1 The Peregrine Fund, Boise, ID, USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/72922/1/j.1469-1795.2007.00118.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1469-1795.2007.00118.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceAnimal Conservationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAgapow, P.-M., Bininda-Edmonds, O.R.P., Crandall, K.A., Gittleman, J.L., Mace, G.M., Marshall, J.C. & Purvis, A. ( 2004 ). The impact of species concept on biodiversity studies. Q. Rev. Biol. 79, 161 – 179.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmadon, D. ( 1960 ). Notes on the genus Chondrohierax. Noved. Colombianas 1, 237 – 238.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmadon, D. ( 1964 ). Taxonomic notes on birds of prey. Am. Mus. Novit. 2166, 2 – 3.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArbogast, B.S., Edwards, S.V., Wakeley, J., Beerli, P. & Slowinski, J.B. ( 2002 ). Estimating divergence times from molecular data on phylogenetic and population genetic timescales. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33, 707 – 740.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAvise, J.C. ( 2004 ). Molecular markers, natural history, and evolution. 2nd edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates Ltd.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBandelt, H.-J., Forster, P. & RÖhl, A. ( 1999 ). Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 37 – 48.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarker, G.M. ( 2002 ). Phylogenetic diversity: a quantitative framework for measurement of priority and achievement in biodiversity conservation. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 76, 165 – 194.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown, L. & Amadon, D. ( 1968 ). Hawks, eagles, and falcons of the world. Vol. 1. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBunce, M., Szulkin, M., Lerner, H.R.L., Barnes, I., Shapiro, B., Cooper, A. & Holdaway, R.N. ( 2005 ). Ancient DNA provides new insights into the evolutionary history of New Zealand's extinct giant eagle. PLoS Biol. 3, e9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarstens, B.C. & Knowles, L.L. ( 2007 ). Shifting distributions and speciation: species divergence during rapid climate change. Mol. Ecol. 16, 619 – 627.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCooper, A. & Poinar, H. ( 2000 ). Ancient DNA: do it right or not at all. Science 289, 1139.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavies, R.G., Orme, C.D.L., Olson, V., Thomas, G.H., Ross, S.G., Ding, T.-S., Rassmussen, P.C., Stattersfield, A.J., Bennett, P.M., Blackburn, T.M., Owens, I.P.F. & Gaston, K.J. ( 2006 ). Human impacts and the global distribution of extinction risk. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B – Biol. Sci. 273, 2127 – 2133.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFerguson-Lees, J. & Christie, D.A. ( 2001 ). Raptors of the world. London: Christopher Helms.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFleischer, R.C., Kirchman, J.J., Dumbacher, J.P., Bevier, L., Dove, C., Rotzel, N.C., Edwards, S.V., Lammertink, M., Miglia, K.L. & Moore, W.S. ( 2006 ). Mid-Pleistocene divergence of Cuban and North American ivory-billed woodpeckers. Biol. Lett. 2, 466 – 469.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrankham, R. ( 1997 ). Do island populations have less genetic variation than mainland populations? Heredity 78, 311 – 327.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFraser, D.J. & Bernatchez, L. ( 2001 ). Adaptive evolutionary conservation: towards a unified concept for defining conservation units. Mol. Ecol. 10, 2741 – 2752.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFriedmann, H. ( 1934 ). The hawks of the genus Chondrohierax. J. Washington Acad. Sci. 24, 310 – 318.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFunk, D.J. & Omland, K.E. ( 2003 ). Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34, 397 – 423.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGaleotti, P. & Rubolini, D. ( 2004 ). The niche variation hypothesis and the evolution of colour polymorphism in birds: a comparative study of owls, nightjars and raptors. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 82, 237 – 248.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGamauf, A., Gjershaug, J.-O., RØv, N., KvalØy, K. & Haring, E. ( 2005 ). Species or subspecies? The delimma of taxonomic ranking of some south-east Asian hawk-eagles (genus Spizaetus). Bird Conserv. Int. 15, 99 – 117.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGarrido, O.H. & Kirkconnell, A. ( 2000 ). Field guide to the birds of Cuba. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGilbert, M.T., Bandelt, H.J., Hofreiter, M. & Barnes, I. ( 2005 ). Assessing ancient DNA studies. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 541 – 544.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldstein, P., Wyner, Y., Doukakis, P., Egan, M.G., Amato, G., Rosenbaum, H. & DeSalle, R. ( 2005 ). Theory and methods for diagnosing species and populations in conservation. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 92, 12 – 27.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrant, P.R. & Grant, B.R. ( 2002 ). Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin's finches. Science 296, 707 – 711.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaig, S.M., Beever, E.A., Chambers, S.M., Draheim, H.M., Dugger, B.D., Dunham, S., Elliott-Smith, E., Fontaine, J.B., Kesler, D.C., Knaus, B.J., Lopes, I.F., Loschl, P., Mullins, T.D. & Sheffield, L.M. ( 2006 ). Taxonomic considerations in listing subspecies under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Conserv. Biol. 20, 1584 – 1594.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHasegawa, M., Kishino, H. & Yano, T. ( 1985 ). Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 21, 160 – 174.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeard, S.B. & Mooers, A.Ø. ( 2002 ). Signatures of random and selective mass extinctions in phylogenetic tree balance. Syst. Biol. 51, 889 – 897.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHelbig, A.J., Kocum, A., Seibold, I. & Braun, M.J. ( 2005 ). A multi-gene phylogeny of aquiline eagles (Aves: Accipitriformes) reveals extensive paraphyly at the genus level. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 35, 147 – 164.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHellmayr, C.E. & Conover, B. ( 1949 ). Catalog of birds of the Americas. Publ. Field Mus. Nat. Hist. Zool. Ser. 13 pt. 1, no. 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHendry, A.P., Vamosi, S.M., Latham, S.J., Heilbuth, J.C. & Day, T. ( 2000 ). Questioning species realities. Conserv. Genet. 1, 67 – 76.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHey, J. ( 2006 ). On the failure of modern species concepts. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 447 – 450.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHey, J. & Machado, C.A. ( 2003 ). The study of structure populations – new hope for a difficult and divided science. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4, 535 – 543.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHey, J. & Nielsen, R. ( 2004 ). Multilocus methods for estimating population sizes, migration rates and divergence time, with applications to the divergence of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.. Genetics 167, 747 – 760.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHey, J., Waples, R.S., Arnold, M.L., Butlin, R.K. & Harrison, R.G. ( 2003 ). Understanding and confronting species uncertainty in biology and conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 597 – 603.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHo, S.Y.W. & Larson, G. ( 2006 ). Molecular clocks: when times are a-changin’. Trends Genet. 22, 79 – 83.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoekstra, J.M., Boucher, T.M., Ricketts, T.H. & Roberts, C. ( 2005 ). Confronting a biome crisis: global disparities of habitat loss and protection. Ecol. Lett. 8, 23 – 29.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencedel Hoyo, J., Elliot, A. & Sargatal, J. (Eds). ( 1994 ). Handbook of the birds of the world. Vol. 2. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHudson, R.R. & Coyne, J.A. ( 2002 ). Mathematical consequences of the genealogical species concept. Evolution 56, 1557 – 1565.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson, J.A., Bellinger, M.R., Toepfer, J.E. & Dunn, P.O. ( 2004 ). Temporal changes in allele frequencies and low effective population size in greater prairie-chickens. Mol. Ecol. 13, 2617 – 2630.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson, J.A., Lerner, H.R.L., Rasmussen, P.C. & Mindell, D.P. ( 2006 ). Systematics within Gyps vultures: a clade at risk. BMC Evol. Biol. 6, 65.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson, J.A., Watson, R.T. & Mindell, D.P. ( 2005 ). Prioritizing species conservation: does the cape verde kite exist? Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B – Biol. Sci. 272, 1365 – 1371.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLerner, H.R.L. & Mindell, D.P. ( 2005 ). Phylogeny of eagles, Old World vultures, and other Accipitridae based on nuclear and mitochondrial DNA. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 37, 327 – 346.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLovette, I.J. ( 2004 ). Mitochondrial dating and mixed support for the “2% rule” in birds. Auk 121, 1 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMace, G.M. ( 2004 ). The role of taxonomy in species conservation. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B – Biol. Sci. 359, 711 – 719.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMace, G.M., Gittleman, J.L. & Purvis, A. ( 2003 ). Preserving the tree of life. Science 300, 1707 – 1709.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaddison, W.P. & Knowles, L.L. ( 2006 ). Inferring phylogeny despite incomplete lineage sorting. Syst. Biol. 55, 21 – 30.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoritz, C. ( 1994 ). Defining ‘evolutionary significant units’ for conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9, 373 – 375.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNylander, J.A.A. ( 2004 ). Mr.ModelTest v2.2. Program distributed by the author, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOmland, K.E., Baker, J.M. & Peters, J.L. ( 2006 ). Genetic signatures of intermediate divergence: population history of old and new world holarctic ravens ( Corvus corax ). Mol. Ecol. 15, 795 – 808.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeters, J.L. ( 1931 ). Checklist of birds of the world. Vol. 1, 1st edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeters, J.L. ( 1979 ). Checklist of birds of the world. Vol. 1, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeters, J.L., Gretes, W. & Omland, K.E. ( 2005 ). Late Pleistocene divergence between eastern and western populations of wood ducks ( Aix sponsa ) inferred by the ‘isolation with migration’ coalescent method. Mol. Ecol. 14, 3407 – 3418.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeterson, A.T., MÁrquez, L.C., JimÉnez, J.L.C., Escalona-Segura, G., Flores-Villela, O., GarcÍa-LÓpez, J., HernÁndez-BaÑos, B., Ruiz, C.A.J., LeÓn-Paniagua, L., Amaro, S.M., Navarro-SigÜenza, A.G., SÁnchez-Cordero, V. & Willard, D.E. ( 2004 ). A preliminary biological survey of Cerro Piedra Larga, Oaxaca, Mexico: birds, mammals, reptiles, amphibians and plants. Ann. Inst. Biol. Ser. Zool. 75, 439 – 466.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePhillimore, A.B. & Owens, I.P.F. ( 2006 ). Are subspecies useful in evolutionary and conservation biology? Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B – Biol. Sci. 273, 1049 – 1053.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePurvis, A., Agapow, P.-M., Gittleman, J.L. & Mace, G.M. ( 2000 ). Nonrandom extinction and the loss of evolutionary history. Science 288, 328 – 330.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePurvis, A., Gittleman, J.L. & Brooks, T. (Eds). ( 2005 ). Phylogeny and conservation. London: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencede Queiroz, K. ( 2005 ). Different species problems and their resolution. BioEssays 27, 1263 – 1269.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaffaele, H., Wiley, J., Garrido, O., Keith, A. & Raffaele, J. ( 1998 ). Birds of the West Indies. London: Christopher Helm Ltd.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRonquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J.P. ( 2003 ). MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19, 1572 – 1574.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosenberg, N.A. ( 2003 ). The shapes of neutral gene genealogies in two species: probabilities of monophyly, paraphyly, and polyphyly in a coalescent model. Evolution 57, 1465 – 1477.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosenberg, N.A. ( 2007 ). Statistical tests for taxonomic distinctiveness from observations of monophyly. Evolution 61, 317 – 323.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosenberg, N.A. & Nordborg, M. ( 2002 ). Genealogical trees, coalescent theory and the analysis of genetic polymorphisms. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3, 380 – 390.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRozas, J., SÁnchez-De, I., Barrio, J.C., Messeguer, X. & Rozas, R. ( 2003 ). dnasp, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics 19, 2496 – 2497.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRueffler, C., Van Dooren, T.J.M., Leimar, O. & Abrams, P.A. ( 2006 ). Disruptive selection and then what? Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 238 – 245.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSites, J.W. & Marshall, J.C. ( 2004 ). Operational criteria for delimiting species. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35, 199 – 227.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, T.B. & Temple, S.A. ( 1982 a ). Feeding habits and bill polymorphism in hook-billed kites. Auk 99, 197 – 207.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, T.B. & Temple, S.A. ( 1982 b ). Grenada hook-billed kites: recent status and life history notes. Condor 84, 131.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSodhi, N.S., Liow, L.H. & Bazzaz, F.A. ( 2004 ). Avian extinction from tropical and subtropical forests. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35, 323 – 345.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpielman, D., Brook, B.W. & Frankham, R. ( 2004 ). Most species are not driven to extinction before genetic factors impact them. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 15261 – 15264.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStotz, D.F., Fitzpatrick, J.W., Parker, T.A. & Moskovits, D.K. ( 1996 ). Neotropical birds: ecology and conservation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwofford, D.L. ( 2003 ). PAUP *, phylogenetic analysis using parsimony ( * and other methods). 4th edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTajima, F. ( 1983 ). Evolutionary relationship of DNA sequences in finite populations. Genetics 105, 437 – 460.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThorstrom, R., Massiah, E. & Hall, C. ( 2001 ). Nesting biology, distribution, and population estimate of the Grenada hook-billed kite Chondrohierax uncinatus mirus. Car. J. Sci. 37, 278 – 281.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWakeley, J. ( 2000 ). The effects of subdivision on the genetic divergence of populations and species. Evolution 54, 1092 – 1101.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZink, R.M. ( 2004 ). The role of subspecies in obscuring avian biological diversity and misleading conservation policy. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. B – Biol. Sci. 271, 561 – 564.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.