Show simple item record

Learning, retention and recall of clinical information

dc.contributor.authorSisson, James C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSwartz, Richard D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWolf, F. M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T20:01:00Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T20:01:00Z
dc.date.issued1992-11en_US
dc.identifier.citationSISSON, J. C.; SWARTZ, R. D.; WOLF, F. M. (1992). "Learning, retention and recall of clinical information." Medical Education 26(6): 454-461. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73144>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0308-0110en_US
dc.identifier.issn1365-2923en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73144
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=1461162&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractA representative group of 33 medical students who were entering the junior year clerkships was tested for retention and recall of clinical information 3 months after taking an examination on the same subject. The students were not given an opportunity to review the subject. On 39 identical multiple choice test questions, the students' mean score declined 10 percentile points ( P < 0.05) from that on the original examination. On 40 comparable but previously unseen questions, the mean score fell 19 percentile points from that attained 3 months earlier. On open-ended questions of clinical reasoning, a third component of the assessment, the students performed at a level similar to those on the two multiple choice tests, but with greater variability. These assessments give data on retention and recall that have not previously been reported in the literature. Correlations among individual test components were moderate ( r = 0.52-0.63). There was inconsistency of individual students in scores on the component tests, and, thus, variability in performance by students was marked. Retention and recall were weakly predicted by results on an initial multiple choice examination. In addition, on a subsequent assessment of knowledge, results from different types of tests were inconsistent, suggesting that these tests evaluate different forms of competence.en_US
dc.format.extent481035 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights1992 Blackwell Publishingen_US
dc.subject.otherStudents, Medical/*Psycholen_US
dc.subject.other*Recall, *Retentionen_US
dc.subject.other*Clinical Medicineen_US
dc.subject.otherClinical Clerkshipen_US
dc.subject.otherEducational Measurementen_US
dc.subject.otherLearningen_US
dc.subject.otherClinical Competenceen_US
dc.titleLearning, retention and recall of clinical informationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducationen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arboren_US
dc.contributor.affiliationum† Department of Postgraduate Medicine and Health Professions Education, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid1461162en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73144/1/j.1365-2923.1992.tb00205.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2923.1992.tb00205.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceMedical Educationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson J. & Graham H. ( 1980 ) A problem in medical education: is there information overload ? Medical Education 14, 4 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArkin H. & Colton R.R. ( 1963 ) In: Tables for Statisticians, 2nd edn, pp. 63. Barnes & Noble, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBordage G. ( 1987 ) The curriculum: overloaded and too general ? Medical Education 21, 183 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCase S.M., Swanson D.B. & Stillman P.L. ( 1988 ) Evaluating diagnostic pattern recognition: the psychometric characteristics of a new item format. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education, pp. 3 – 8. Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCleveland W.S. ( 1985 ) The Elements of Graphing Data. Wadsworth, Monterey, California.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCovell D.G., Ulman G.C. & Manning P.R. ( 1985 ) Information needs in office practice: are they being met ? Annals of Internal Medicine 103, 596 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Board of Medical Examiners ( 1990 ) Part I/II/III Examination Guidelines and Sample Items. National Board of Medical Examiners, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.