Show simple item record

Validity of a brief questionnaire in screening asymptomatic subjects from subjects with tension-type headaches or temporomandibular disorders

dc.contributor.authorGerstner, Geoffrey E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorClark, Glenn T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGoulet, Jean-Paulen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T20:01:30Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T20:01:30Z
dc.date.issued1994-08en_US
dc.identifier.citationGerstner, Geoffrey E.; Clark, Glenn T.; Goulet, Jean-Paul (1994). "Validity of a brief questionnaire in screening asymptomatic subjects from subjects with tension-type headaches or temporomandibular disorders." Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 22(4): 235-242. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73152>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0301-5661en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-0528en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73152
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=7924238&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstract– Clinical investigations of temporomandibular disorders require objective, repeatable methods for screening diseased subjects from non-diseased control subjects. This study evaluated whether information gathered from a short, public domain questionnaire was useful in distinguishing temporomandibular disorder subjects ( n = 216) from non-temporomandibular disorder controls ( n = 69) and tension-type headache subjects ( n = 22). The questionnaire consisted of eight questions relating to jaw pain (i.e., location of pain, precipitating factors, and temporal pattern of pain) and five questions relating to jaw function (i.e., joint noises, locking, and difficulty in opening). There were five possible answers to each question which ranged from 0 (no symptoms) to 4 (unbearable or constant symptoms). The total scores for the eight pain questions and the five jaw function questions were used to determine the questionnaire's sensitivity and specificity in each group, and ROC curves were plotted to identify the best cutoff point for disease presence or absence. Results showed that the questionnaire reliably distinguished between the control group and tempormandibular disorder group with 90.3% 97.7% sensitivity and 95.7%–100% specificity at cutoff values between 5 and 9. These results support the use of the questionnaire as a primary screening tool for general practice and as a supplementary screening tool for clinical temporomandibular disorder studies. However, results also showed that the questionnaire was unable to distinguish easily between TMD subjects and temporalis region tension-type headache subjects.en_US
dc.format.extent2803591 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/octet-stream
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rightsMunksgaard 1994en_US
dc.subject.otherTemporomandibular Joint Diseasesen_US
dc.subject.otherTacial Painen_US
dc.subject.otherQuestionnairesen_US
dc.subject.otherRoutine Diagnostic Testsen_US
dc.titleValidity of a brief questionnaire in screening asymptomatic subjects from subjects with tension-type headaches or temporomandibular disordersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDental Research Institute, UCLA School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherEcole de Madecine Dentaire, Universite Laval, Ouebec, Canadaen_US
dc.identifier.pmid7924238en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73152/1/j.1600-0528.1994.tb01810.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-0528.1994.tb01810.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceCommunity Dentistry and Oral Epidemiologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomand Dis 1992; 6: 301 – 55.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHelkimo M. Studies on function and dysfunction of the masticatory system. I. An epidemiological investigation of symptions of dysfunction in Lapps in the north of Finland. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1974; 70: 37 – 40.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHelkimo M. Studies on function and dysfunction of the masticatory system. II. Index for anamnestic and clinical dysfunction and occlusal state. Swed Dent J 1974; 67: 101 – 21.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHelkimo M. Studies on function and dysfunction of the masticatory system. III. Analysis of anamnestic and clinical recordings of dysfunction with the aid of indices. Swed Dent J 1974; 67: 165 – 82.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFricton J. Schiffman EL. Reliability of a craniomandibular index. J Dent Res 1986; 65: 1359 – 64.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFricton J. Schiffman E. The craniomandibular index: validity. J Prosthet Dent 1987; 58: 221 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCooper BC, Rabuzzi DD. Myofacial [sic] pain dysfunction syndrome: a clinical study of asymptomatic subjects. Laryngoscope 1984; 94; 68 – 75.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLundeen TF, Levitt SR, McKinney MW. Discriminative ability of the TMJ scale: age and gender differences. J Prosthent Dent 1986; 56: 84 – 92.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevitt SR, McKinney MW, Lundeen TF. The TMJ scale: cross-validation and reliability studies. J Craniomand Disorders 1988; 6: 17 – 25.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeardorff WW, Butterworth JC. Patient self-report vs. examiner assessment of TMJ symptoms: stability of correspondence rates during treatment. J Craniomand Pract 1988; 6: 316 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeine FS, Hutchins MO, Lund JP. An evaluation of the criteria used to diagnose mandibular dysfunction with the mandibular kinesiograph. J Prostliet Dent 1988; 60: 374 – 80.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWidmer CG, Lund JP, Feine JS. Evaluation of diagnostic tests for TMD. J Calif Dent Assoc 1990; 18: 53 – 60.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBibb CA, Pullinger AG, Baldioceda F. Murakami KI, Ross JB. Temporoman-dibular joint comparative imaging: diagnostic efficacy of arthroscopy compared to tomography and arthrography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989; 68: 352 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFava C. Gatti G. Cardesi E. Parchetti R. Rocca G. Preti G. Possibilities and limits in identifying the TMJ articular menisus with the CT scanner: a comparative anatomoradiological study. J Craniomandib Disord Facial Oral Pain 1988; 2: 141 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHatala MP, Westesson PL, Tallents RH, Katzberg RW. TMJ disc displacement in asymptomatic volunteers detected by MRI imaging. J Dent Res 1991; 70: ( Spec Iss ): 278.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOeberg T, Carlsson GE, Fajers CM. The temporomandibular joint: a morphologic study on human autopsy material. Acta Odontol Scand 1971; 29: 349 – 84.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSolberg WK, Hansson TL, Nordstroem B. The temporomandibular joint: in young adults at autopsy: a morphologic classification and evaluation. J Oral Rehabil 1985; 12: 303 – 21.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDworkin SF, Huggins KH, LeResche L. et al. Epidemiology of signs and symptoms in temporomandibular disorders: clinical signs in cases and conirols. J Am Deta Assoc 1990; 120: 273 – 81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoulet JP, Clark GT, Flack VE. Reproducibility of examiner performance for muscle and joint palpation in the temporomandibular system following training and calibiation. Cominunity Dent Oral Epidemiol 1993; 21: 72 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoulet JP, Clark GT. Clinical TMJ examination methods. J Calif Dent Assoc 1990; 18: 25 – 33.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGriner PF, Mayewsky RJ, Mushlin AI, Grennland P. Selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests and procedures. Ann Int Med 1981; 94: 533 – 600.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrowner WS, Newman TB, Cummings SR. Designing a new study: III. Diagriostic tests. In: Hullev SG, Cummings SR. eds. Designing clinical research. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins. 1988; 87 – 97.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRugh JD, Solberg WK. Oral health statas in the United States: temporoman, dibular disorders. J Dent Educ 1985; 49: 398 – 405.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.