Show simple item record

Stand Characteristics and Leaf Litter Composition of a Dry Forest Hectare in Santa Rosa National Park, Costa Rica

dc.contributor.authorBurnham, Robyn J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T20:06:34Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T20:06:34Z
dc.date.issued1997-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationBurnham, Robyn J. (1997). "Stand Characteristics and Leaf Litter Composition of a Dry Forest Hectare in Santa Rosa National Park, Costa Rica." Biotropica 29(4): 384-395. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73234>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0006-3606en_US
dc.identifier.issn1744-7429en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73234
dc.description.abstractOne hectare of tropical dry forest in Guanacaste Conservation Area, Costa Rica was mapped and all trees larger than 10 cm diameter at breast height (DBH) identified. The same hectare was sampled for leaf litter and the two data sets, forest and litter, were compared. Dominant and subdominant species of the forest are represented in the leaf litter, whereas rare tree species are highly variable in their representation in the leaf litter. Relative abundance of dominant and subdominant tree species is represented well by the litter although absolute rank-order is nor identical between source forest basal area and leaf litter mass. The litter adds a significant component to the source forest data owing to the presence of vines and lianas, and more rarely small trees or shrubs. This indicates that litter studies may be able to add depth to forest diversity surveys. The source forest also was used to test foliar physiognomic reconstructions of climate that have been proposed recently by paleobotanists as an alternative to taxonomic affinities methods. The observed climate of the area does not conform to the climatic values that were predicted by application of these new methods. RESUMEN Una hectÁrea de bosque seco tropical en el Area de ConservaciÓn de Guanacaste, Costa Rica fue mapeada, y todos los Árboles mayores de 10 cm de dap fueron identificados. En la misma hectÁrea, se tomaron muestras de hojarasca y los dos colecciones de datos. bosque y hojarasca, fueron comparadas. Se encontrÓ que las especies dominantes y subdominantes del bosque estaban representadas en las muestras de hojarasca, mientras que la presencia de especias arbÓreas raras en las muestras de mojarasca fue muy variable. La abundancia relativa de especies arbÓreas dominantesestÁ bien representada en la hojarasca aunque el Área basal del bosque de origen y la masa de hojarasca no heron idÉnticos en rangos absolutos. La hojarasca aÑade un componente significativo a los datos del bosque de origen debido a la presencia de bejucos y lianas en la hojarasca, y mÁs raramente Árboles pequeÑos y arbustos. Estos datos indican que los estudios de hojarasca pueden incrementar la precisiÓn de las estimaciones de la diversidad de los bosques. El bosque de origen fue usado tarnbien para examinar reconstrucciones del clima basados en la fisiognomia foliar recientemenre propuesras por paleobotÁnicas como una alternativa a mÉtodos de afinidad raxonÓmicas. El clima observado en el Área no corresponde con los valores climÁticos que fueron predecidos por la aplicaciÓn de estos nuevos mÉtodos.en_US
dc.format.extent829301 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights1997 The Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherBiodiversityen_US
dc.subject.otherConservationen_US
dc.subject.otherFossil Plantsen_US
dc.subject.otherGuanacasteen_US
dc.subject.otherLeaf Litteren_US
dc.subject.otherLianasen_US
dc.subject.otherPaleobotanyen_US
dc.subject.otherTropical Dy Foresten_US
dc.titleStand Characteristics and Leaf Litter Composition of a Dry Forest Hectare in Santa Rosa National Park, Costa Ricaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumMuseum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1079, U.S.A.en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73234/1/j.1744-7429.1997.tb00034.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1744-7429.1997.tb00034.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceBiotropicaen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBailey, I. W., and E. W. Sinnot 1916. The climatic distribution of certain types of angiosperm leaves. Am. J. Bot. 3: 24 – 39.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBorchert, R. 1983. Phenology and control of flowering in tropical trees. Biotropica 15 ( 2 ): 81 – 89.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBullock, S. H., H. A. Mooney, and E. Medina 1995. Seasonally dry tropical forests. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurghouts, T. B. A., E. J. F. Campbell, and P. J. Kolderman 1994. Effects of tree species heterogeneity on leaf fall in primary and logged dipterocarp forest in the Ulu Segama Forest Reserve, Sabah, Malaysia. J. Trop Ecol. 10: 1 – 26.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurnham, R. J. 1993. Reconstructing richness in the plant fossil record. Palaios 8: 376 – 384.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurnham, R. J. 1994. Patterns in tropical leaf litter and implications for angiosperm paleobotany. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 81: 99 – 113.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurnham, R. J, S. L. Wing, and G. G. Parker 1992. The reflection of deciduous forest communities in leaf litter: implications for autochthonous litter assemblages from the fossil record. Paleobiology 18 ( 1 ): 34 – 53.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCoen, E. 1983. Climate. In D.H. Janzen, ( Ed.). Costa Rica Natural History, pp. 35 – 46. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, Illinois.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDaubenmire, R. 1972. Phenology and other characteristics of tropical semi-deciduous forest in northwestern Costa Rica. J. Ecol. 6: 147 – 170.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrankie G. W., H. G. Baker, and P. A. Opler. 1974. Comparative phenological studies of trees in tropical wet and dry forests of the lowlands of Costa Rica. J. Ecol. 62: 881 – 913.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGentry, A. H. 1991. The distribution and evolution of climbing plants. In F. E. Putz and H. A. Mooney ( Eds. ). The biology of vines, pp. 3 – 52. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGregory, K. M., and C. M. Chase 1992. Tectonic significance of paleobotanically estimated climate and altitude of the late Eocene erosion surface, Colorado. Geology 20: 581 – 585.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJanzen, D. H. 1967. Synchronization of sexual reproduction of trees within the dry season in Central America. Evolution 21: 620 – 637.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJanzen, D. H. 1983. No park is an island: increase in interference from outside as park size decreases. Oikos 41: 402 – 410.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJanzen, D. H. 1988a. Tropical dry forest: the most endangered major tropical ecosystem. In E. O. Wilson, ( Ed.). Biodiversity, pp. 130 – 137. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJanzen, D. H. 1988b. Management of habitat fragments in a tropical dry forest: Growth. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 75: 105 – 116.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJanzen, D. H. 1988c. Guanacaste National Park: Tropical ecological and biocultural restoration. In J. Cairns, Jr., ( Ed.). Rehabilitating damaged ecosystems Vol II, pp. 143 – 192. CRC Press: Boca Raton, Florida.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJanzen, D. H. 1993. Caterpillar seasonality in a Costa Rican dry forest. In N. E. Stamp and T. M. Casey, ( Eds.). Caterpillars: Ecological and evolutionary constraints on foraging, pp. 448 – 477. Chapman and Hall, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKoelmeyer, K. 1960. The periodicity of leaf change and flowering in the principal forest communities of Ceylon. II. Phenology of the tropical dry mixed evergreen forest. Ceylon For. 4: 308 – 364.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLieberman, D. 1982. Seasonality and phenology in a dry tropical forest in Ghana. J. Ecol. 70: 791 – 806.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiesner, R., and D. H. Janzen 1980. Annotated check-list of plants of lowland Guanacaste Province, Costa Rica, exclusive of grasses and non-vascular cryptogams. Brenesia 18: 15 – 90.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLott, E. J., S. H. Bullock and J. A. Solis-Magalanes. 1987. Floristic diversity and structure of upland and arroyo forests of coastal Jalisco. Biotropica 19 ( 3 ): 228 – 235.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaas, J. M. 1995. Conversion of tropical dry forest to pasture and agriculture. In S. H. Bullock, H. A. Mooney, and E. Medina, ( Eds.). Seasonally dry tropical forests, pp. 399 – 422. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacGinitie, H. D. 1969. The Eocene Green River flora of northwestern Colorado and northeastern Utah. University of California Publications in Geological Sciences 83: Berkeley, California.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMagurran, A. E. 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Croom Helm: London, England.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartÍnez-YrÍzar, A. 1995. Biomass distribution and primary productivity of tropical dry forests. In S. H. Bullock, H. A. Mooney, and E. Medina, ( Eds.). Seasonally dry tropical forests, pp. 326 – 345. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMurphy, P. G., and A. E. Lugo. 1986. Ecology of tropical dry forest. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17: 67 – 88.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMurphy, P. G., and A. E. Lugo. 1995. Dry forests of Central America and the Caribbean. In S. H. Bullock, H. A. Mooney, and E. Medina, ( Eds.). Seasonally dry tropical forests, pp. 9 – 34. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParker, G. G., J. P. O'Neill, and D. Higman. 1989. Vertical profile and canopy organization in a mixed deciduous forest. Vegetatio 85: 1 – 11.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReich, P. B., and R. Borchert 1984. Water stress and tree phenology in a tropical dry forest in the lowlands of Costa Rica. J. Ecol. 72: 61 – 74.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWing, S. L. 1987. Eocene and Oligocene floras and vegetation of the Rocky Mountains. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 74 ( 4 ): 748 – 784.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWing, S. L. 1987, and D. R. Greenwood 1993. Fossils and fossil climate: the case for equable continental interiors in the Eocene. Phil. Trans. R. SOC. Lond. B, 341: 243 – 252.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWolfe, J. A. 1978. A paleobotanical interpretation of Teritary climates in the northern hemisphere. Am. Sci. 66 ( 6 ): 694 – 703.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWolfe, J. A. 1993. A method of obtaining climatic parameters from leaf assemblages. U. S. Geol. Survey Bull. 2040 1 – 73.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.