View Item 

Show simple item record

Geographic Variation in Organ Availability Is Responsible for Disparities in Liver Transplantation between Hispanics and Caucasians
dc.contributor.authorVolk, Michael L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChoi, H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWarren, Gareth J. W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSonnenday, Christopher J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMarrero, Jorge A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHeisler, M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T20:11:07Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T20:11:07Z
dc.date.issued2009-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationVolk, M. L.; Choi, H.; Warren, G. J. W.; Sonnenday, C. J.; Marrero, J. A.; Heisler, M. (2009). "Geographic Variation in Organ Availability Is Responsible for Disparities in Liver Transplantation between Hispanics and Caucasians." American Journal of Transplantation 9(9): 2113-2118. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73308>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-6135en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-6143en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73308
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=19624565&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent163375 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.rights© 2009 American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeonsen_US
dc.subject.otherClinical Liver Transplantationen_US
dc.subject.otherRacial and Ethnic Disparitiesen_US
dc.subject.otherRegional Sharingen_US
dc.subject.otherWaiting Timeen_US
dc.titleGeographic Variation in Organ Availability Is Responsible for Disparities in Liver Transplantation between Hispanics and Caucasiansen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Internal Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.pmid19624565en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73308/1/j.1600-6143.2009.02744.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02744.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Transplantationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJulapalli VR, Kramer JR, El-Serag HB. Evaluation for liver transplantation: Adherence to AASLD referral guidelines in a large Veterans Affairs center. Liver Transpl 2005; 11: 1370 – 1378.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReid AE, Resnick M, Chang Y, Buerstatte N, Weissman JS. Disparity in use of orthotopic liver transplantation among blacks and whites. Liver Transpl 2004; 10: 834 – 841.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKlassen AC, Klassen DK, Brookmeyer R, Frank RG, Marconi K. Factors influencing waiting time and successful receipt of cadaveric liver transplant in the United States. 1990 to 1992. Med Care 1998; 36: 281 – 294.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNguyen GC, Segev DL, Thuluvath PJ. Racial disparities in the management of hospitalized patients with cirrhosis and complications of portal hypertension: A national study. Hepatology 2007; 45: 1282 – 1289.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiegel AB, McBride RB, El-Serag HB et al. Racial disparities in utilization of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States, 1998–2002. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 120 – 127.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWiesner R, Edwards E, Freeman R et al. Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers. Gastroenterology 2003; 124: 91 – 96.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference7.  IOM. Organ procurement and transplantation: assessing current policies and the impact of the DHHS final rule. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2000.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKamath PS, Wiesner RH, Malinchoc M et al. A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease. Hepatology 2001; 33: 464 – 470.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAshby VB, Kalbfleisch JD, Wolfe RA, Lin MJ, Port FK, Leichtman AB. Geographic variability in access to primary kidney transplantation in the United States, 1996–2005. Am J Transplant 2007; 7 ( 5 Pt 2 ): 1412 – 1423.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoylan CA, Brady CW, Johnson JL, Smith AD, Tuttle-Newhall JE, Muir AJ. Disparities in liver transplantation before and after introduction of the MELD score. JAMA 2008; 300: 2371 – 2378.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBernstein R. U.S. Hispanic population surpasses 45 million. U.S. Census Bureau News 2008 May 1, 2008.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArmstrong GL, Wasley A, Simard EP, McQuillan GM, Kuhnert WL, Alter MJ. The prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in the United States, 1999 through 2002. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144: 705 – 714.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim WR, Therneau TM, Benson JT et al. Deaths on the liver transplant waiting list: An analysis of competing risks. Hepatology 2006; 43: 345 – 351.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLunn M, McNeil D. Applying Cox regression to competing risks. Biometrics 1995; 51: 524 – 532.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCoviello V, Boggess M. Cumulative incidence estimation in the presence of competing risks. Stata J 2004; 4: 103 – 112.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVolk ML, Hernandez JC, Lok AS, Marrero JA. Modified Charlson comorbidity index for predicting survival after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 2007; 13: 1515 – 1520.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHausman JA. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 1978; 46: 1251 – 1271.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoberts JP, Dykstra DM, Goodrich NP, Rush SH, Merion RM, Port FK. Geographic differences in event rates by model for end-stage liver disease score. Am J Transplant 2006; 6: 2470 – 2475.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAxelrod DA, Guidinger MK, Finlayson S et al. Rates of solid-organ wait-listing, transplantation, and survival among residents of rural and urban areas. JAMA 2008; 299: 202 – 207.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSharma P, Schaubel DE, Sima CS, Merion RM, Lok AS. Re-weighting the model for end-stage liver disease score components. Gastroenterology 2008; 135: 1575 – 1581.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Ann Intern Med 1999; 130: 461 – 470.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShaheen NJ, Hansen RA, Morgan DR et al. The burden of gastrointestinal and liver diseases, 2006. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 2128 – 2138.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFreeman RB, Jr, Steffick DE, Guidinger MK, Farmer DG, Berg CL, Merion RM. Liver and intestine transplantation in the United States, 1997–2006. Am J Transplant 2008; 8 ( 4 Pt 2 ): 958 – 976.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStahl JE, Kong N, Shechter SM, Schaefer AJ, Roberts MS. A methodological framework for optimally reorganizing liver transplant regions. Med Decis Making 2005; 25: 35 – 46.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1600-6143.2009.02744.x.pdf
Size:
159.5KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.