View Item 

Show simple item record

Systematic Review of the Predictors of Recurrent Hemorrhage After Endoscopic Hemostatic Therapy for Bleeding Peptic Ulcers
dc.contributor.authorElmunzer, B. Josephen_US
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Scott D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorInadomi, John M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSchoenfeld, Philip S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLaine, Lorenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T20:13:48Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T20:13:48Z
dc.date.issued2008-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationElmunzer, B. Joseph; Young, Scott D.; Inadomi, John M.; Schoenfeld, Philip; Laine, Loren (2008). "Systematic Review of the Predictors of Recurrent Hemorrhage After Endoscopic Hemostatic Therapy for Bleeding Peptic Ulcers." The American Journal of Gastroenterology 103(10): 2625-2632. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73351>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0002-9270en_US
dc.identifier.issn1572-0241en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73351
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=18684171&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent116491 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.rights© 2008 American College of Gastroenterology/Blackwell Publishingen_US
dc.titleSystematic Review of the Predictors of Recurrent Hemorrhage After Endoscopic Hemostatic Therapy for Bleeding Peptic Ulcersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumVeteran Affairs Center for Excellence in Health Services Research, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherOhio State University Medical Center, Columbus, Ohioen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherGI Health Outcomes, Policy and Economics (HOPE) Research Program, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, Californiaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, Californiaen_US
dc.identifier.pmid18684171en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73351/1/j.1572-0241.2008.02070.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02070.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe American Journal of Gastroenterologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGilbert DA. Epidemiology of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 1990; 36: S8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLongstreth GF. Epidemiology of hospitalization for acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: A population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol 1995; 90: 206.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Leerdam ME, Vreeburg EM, Rauws EA, et al. Acute upper GI bleeding: Did anything change? Time trend analysis of incidence and outcome of acute upper GI bleeding between 1993/1994 and 2000. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 1494.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRockall TA, Logan RF, Devlin HB, et al. ( Incidence of and mortality from acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage in the United Kingdom. Steering Committee and members of the National Audit of Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage. BMJ 1996; 311: 222 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJutabha R, Jensen D. Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. In: Friedman S, McQuaid K, Grendell J, eds. Current diagnosis & treatment in gastroenterology. New York, NY: Lange Medical Books/McGraw-Hill, 2003: 53 – 69.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSacks HS, Chalmers TC, Blum AL, et al. Endoscopic hemostasis. An effective therapy for bleeding peptic ulcers. JAMA 1990; 264: 494 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCook DJ, Guyatt GH, Salena BJ, et al. Endoscopic therapy for acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: A meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 1992; 102: 139 – 148.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJones F. Hematemesis and melena: With special reference to causation and to the factors influencing mortality from bleeding peptic ulcers. Gastroenterology 1956; 30: 166 – 190.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacLeod I, Mills PR. Factors identifying the probability of further hemorrhage after acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Br J Surg 1982; 69: 256 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThomopolous K, Theocradis G, Vagenas K, et al. Predictors of hemostatic failure after adrenaline injection in patients with non-bleeding visible vessel. Scand J Gastroenterol 2004; 39: 600 – 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuglielmi A, Ruzzenente A, Sandri M, et al. Risk assessment and prediction of rebleeding in bleeding gastroduodenal ulcer. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 778 – 86.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThomopolous K, Mitropoulos J, Katsakoulis E, et al. Factors associated with failure of endoscopic injection hemostasis in bleeding peptic ulcers. Scand J Gastroenterol 2001; 36: 664 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWong S, Yu L, Lau J, et al. Predictors of therapeutic failure after adrenaline injection plus heater probe treatment in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer. Gut 2002; 50: 322 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChung I, Kim E, Lee M, et al. Endoscopic factors predisposing to rebleeding following endoscopic hemostasis in bleeding peptic ulcers. Endoscopy 2001; 33: 969 – 75.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrullet E, Campo R, Calvet X, et al. Factors related to the failure of endoscopic injection therapy for bleeding gastric ulcer. Gut 1996; 39: 155 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrullet E, Calvet X, Campo R, et al. Factors predicting failure of endoscopic injection therapy in bleeding duodenal ulcer. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 43: 111 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChoudari C, Rajgopal C, Elton R, et al. Failure of endoscopic therapy for bleeding peptic ulcer: An analysis of risk factors. Am J Gastroenterol 1994; 89: 1968 – 72.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePark K, Steele R, Mollison J, et al. Prediction of recurrent bleeding after endoscopic haemostasis in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 1465 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVillanueva C, Balanzo J, Espinos J, et al. Prediction of therapeutic failure in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer treated with endoscopioc injection. Dig Dis Sci 1993; 11: 2062 – 70.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaeed Z, Winshester C, Michaletz P, et al. A scoring system to predict rebleeding after endoscopic therapy of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, with a comparison of heat probe and ethanol injection. Am J Gastroenterol 1993; 88: 1842 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrullet E, Campo R, Bedos G, et al. Site and size of bleeding peptic ulcer. Is there any relation to the efficacy of hemostatic sclerotherapy? Endoscopy 1991; 23: 73 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCook DJ, Mulrow CD, Haynes RB. Systematic reviews: Synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Ann Intern Med 1997; 126: 389 – 91.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarris RP, Helfand M, Woolf SH, et al. Methods Work Group, Third US Preventive Services Task Force. Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: A review of the process. Am J Prev Med 2001; 20 ( Suppl 3 ): 21 – 35.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarmo R, Rotondano G, Bianco MA, et al. Outcome of endoscopic treatment for peptic ulcer bleeding: Is a second look necessary? A meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 62 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMessmann H, Schaller P, Andus T, et al. Effect of programmed endoscopic follow-up examinations on the rebleeding rates of gastric and duodenal peptic ulcers treated by injection therapy: A prospective, randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 1998; 30: 583 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarkun A, Bardou M, Marshall J, et al. Consensus recommendations for the management of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139: 843 – 57.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKollef M, Canfield D, Zuckerman G. Triage considerations for patients with acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage admitted to a medical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 1995; 23: 1048 – 54.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAfessa B. Triage of patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding for intensive care unit admission based on risk factors for poor outcome. J Clin Gastroenterol 2000; 30: 281 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElmunzer B, Inadomi J, Elta G. Risk stratification in UGI bleeding. J Clin Gastroenterol 2007; 41: 559 – 63.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchaffalitzky de Muckadell O, Havelund T, Harling H, et al. Effect of omeprazole on the outcome of endoscopically treated bleeding peptic ulcers: Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre study. Scand J Gastroenterol 1997; 32: 320 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLin H, Lo W, Lee F, et al. A prospective randomized comparative trial showing that omeprazole prevents rebleeding in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer after successful endoscopic therapy. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158: 54 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLau J, Sung J, Lee K, et al. Effect of intravenous omeprazole on recurrent bleeding after endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 310 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZargar S, Javid G, Khan B, et al. Pantoprazole infusion as adjuvant therapy to endoscopic treatment in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding: Prospective randomized controlled trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 21: 716 – 21.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJensen D, Pace S, Soffer E, et al. Continuous infusion of pantoprazole versus ranitidine for prevention of ulcer rebleeding: A U.S. multicenter randomized, double-blind study. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 1991 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarkun A, Racz I, van Rensburg C, et al. Prevention of peptic ulcer rebleeding using continuous infusion of pantoprazole versus ranitidine: A multicenter, multinational, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group comparison. Gastroenterology 2004; 126 ( Suppl 2 ): A - 78.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHung W, Li V, Chung C, et al. Randomized trial comparing pantoprazole infusion, bolus and no treatment on gastric pH and recurrent bleeding in peptic ulcers. ANZ J Surg 207; 77: 677 – 81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRockall T, Logan R, Devlin H, et al. Risk assessment after acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Gut 1996; 38: 316 – 21.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRockall T, Logan R, Devlin H, et al. Selection of patients for early discharge or outpatient care after acute gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Lancet 1996; 347: 1138 – 40.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrullet E, Campo R, Calvet X, et al. A randomized study of the safety of outpatient care f or patients with bleeding peptic ulcer treated by endoscopic injection. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 15 – 21.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLaine L, Shah A, Bemanian S. Intragastric pH with oral versus intravenous bolus + infusion proton pump inhibitor therapy in patients with bleeding ulcers. Gastroenterology 2008; 134: 1836 – 41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCalvet X, Vergara M, Brullet E, et al. Addition of a second endoscopic treatment following epinephrine injection improves outcome in high-risk bleeding ulcers. Gastroenterology 2004; 126: 441 – 50.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1572-0241.2008.02070.x.pdf
Size:
113.7KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.