View Item 

Show simple item record

What Motivates Participation in Violent Political Action
dc.contributor.authorGinges, Jeremyen_US
dc.contributor.authorAtran, Scotten_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T20:14:25Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T20:14:25Z
dc.date.issued2009-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationGinges, Jeremy; Atran, Scott (2009). "What Motivates Participation in Violent Political Action." Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1167(1 Values, Empathy, and Fairness across Social Barriers ): 115-123. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73361>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0077-8923en_US
dc.identifier.issn1749-6632en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73361
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=19580558&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent173064 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.rights© 2009 The New York Academy of Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherPolitical Violenceen_US
dc.subject.otherTerrorism, Sacred Valuesen_US
dc.subject.otherPalestiniansen_US
dc.subject.otherSettlersen_US
dc.titleWhat Motivates Participation in Violent Political Actionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelScience (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique – Institut Jean Nicod, Paris, France; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA; and John Jay College of Criminal Justice, New York, New York 10019, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherNew School for Social Research, New York, New York 10011, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid19580558en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73361/1/j.1749-6632.2009.04543.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04543.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciencesen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOlson, M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, MA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePopkin, S. 1979. The Rational peasant: The Political Economy of Rural Society in Vietnam. University of California Press. Berkeley, CA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLichbach, M. 1994. What makes rational peasants revolutionary? Dilemma, paradox, and irony in peasant collective action. World Polit. 48: 383 – 418.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLupia, A. & G. Sin. 2003. Which public goods are endangered?: How evolving communication technologies affect the logic of collective action. Public Choice 117: 315 – 331.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeinstein, J. 2004. What makes rational peasants revolutionary? Dilemma, paradox, and irony in peasant collective action. Retrieved May 1, 2004, from https://upload.mcgill.ca/rgchr/weinstein.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGinges, J., A. Atran, D. Medin & K. Shikaki. 2007. Sacred bounds on rational resolution of violent political conflict. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 7357 – 7360.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGinges, J., & S. Atran. 2009. Non-instrumental reasoning over sacred values: An Indonesian field experiment. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 50: Moral Judgment and Decision Making. D.M. Bartels, C.W. Bauman, L.J. Skitka & D.L. Medin, Eds.: Academic Press. San Diego, CA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAtran, S., R. Axelrod & R. Davis. 2008. Sacred barriers to conflict resolution. Science 317: 1039 – 1040.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGinges, J. & S. Atran. 2008. Humiliation and the inertia effect: Implications for understanding violence and compromise in intractable intergroup conflicts. J. Cogn. Cult. 8: 281 – 294.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBowles, S. 2006. Group competition, reproductive leveling and the evolution of human altruism. Science 314: 1569 – 1572.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChoi, J.K. & S. Bowles. 2007. The co-evolution of parochial altruism and war. Science 318: 636 – 640.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCollier, P. & A. Hoeffler. 2004. Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxford Econ. Pap. 56: 563 – 595.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFearon, J. & D. Laitin. 2003. Ethnicity, insurgency and civil war. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 97: 75 – 90.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacCulloch, R. 2004. The impact of income on the taste for revolt. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 48: 830 – 849.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJost, J.T., M.R. Banaji & B.A. Nosek. 2004. A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Polit. Psychol. 25: 881 – 920.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSidanius, J. & F. Pratto. 1999. Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression. Cambridge University Press. New York, NY.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTajfel, H. 1981. Human Groups and Social Categories. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, MA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTropp, P.R. & A.C. Brown. 2004. What benefits the group can also benefit the individual: Group enhancing and individual enhancing motives for collective action. Group Process. Interg. 7: 267 – 282.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMuller, E.N. & K.-D. Opp. 1986. Rational choice and rebellious collective action. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 80: 471 – 487.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMuller, E.N., H.A. Dietz & S.E. Finkel. 1991. Discontent and the expected utility of rebellion: The case of Peru. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 85: 1261 – 1284.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEinwohner, R.L. 2003. Opportunity, Honor, and Action in the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising of 1943. Am. J. Sociol. 109: 650 – 675.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan Vugt, M. 2001. Community identification moderating the impact of financial incentives in a natural social dilemma: Water conservation. Pers. Soc. Psychol. B 27: 1440 – 1449.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan Vugt, M. & C.M. Hart. 2004. Social identity as social glue: The origins of group loyalty. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 86: 585 – 598.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDevos, T. & M.R. Banaji. 2003. Implicit self and identity. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1001: 177 – 211.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreenwald, A.G. & S.D. Farnham. 2000. Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 79: 1022 – 1038.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, E.R. & S. Nenry. 1996. An in-group becomes part of the self: Response time evidence. Pers. Soc. Psychol. B 22: 635 – 642.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTurner, J.C., P.J. Oakes, S.A. Haslam & C. McGarty. 1994. Self and collective – cognition and social context. Pers. Soc. Psychol. B 20: 454 – 463.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTurner, J.C. & P.J. Oakes. 1997. The socially structured mind. In The Message of Social Psychology: Perspectives on Mind in Society. C. McGarty & S.A. Haslam, Eds. Blackwell Publishers. Oxford, UK.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSturmer, S. & B. Simon. 2004. The role of collective identification in social movement participations: A panel study in the context of the German gay movement. Pers. Soc. Psychol. B 30: 263 – 277.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarnes, S.H., & M. Kaase. 1979. Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Sage. Beverly Hills, CA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrant, P.R. & R. Brown. 1995. From ethnocentrism to collective protest: Responses to relative deprivation and threats to social identity. Soc. Psychol. Quart. 58: 195 – 211.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuimond, S. & L. Dube-Simard. 1983. Relative deprivation theory and the Quebec nationalist movement: The cognition-emotion distinction and the personal-group deprivation issue. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 44: 526 – 535.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMuller, E.N. 1972. A Test of a Partial Theory of Political Violence. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 66: 928 – 959.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRunciman, W.G. 1966. Relative Deprivation and Social Justice. University of California Press. Berkeley, CA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFiske, A.P. & P.E. Tetlock. 1997. Taboo trade-offs: Reactions to transactions that transgress spheres of justice. Polit. Psychol. 18: 255 – 297.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeather, N.T. 2004. Value correlates of ambivalent attitudes toward gender relations. Pers. Soc. Psychol. B 30: 3 – 12.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwartz, S.H. & W. Bilsky. 1987. Toward a universal psychological structure of human-values. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 53: 550 – 562.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwartz, S. H. 1994. Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human-values. J. Soc. Issues 50: 19 – 45.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVerplanken, B. & R.W. Holland. 2002. Motivated decision making: Effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 82: 434 – 447.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwartz, S.H., G. Melech, A. Lehmann, et al. 2001. Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 32: 519 – 542.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeisburd, D. 1989. Jewish Settler Violence: Deviance as Social Reaction. Pennsylvania State University Press. University Park, PA and London, UK.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeeter, S., C. Miller, A. Kohut, et al. 2000. Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a national telephone survey. Public Opin. Quart. 64: 125 – 148.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference43.  Pew Research Center. 2004. Polls face growing resistance, but still representative. Retrieved 12 May, 2004, from http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=211en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1749-6632.2009.04543.x.pdf
Size:
169.0KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.