View Item 

Show simple item record

Trust, Distrust and Trustworthiness
dc.contributor.authorGoold, Susan Dorren_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T20:21:55Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T20:21:55Z
dc.date.issued2002-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationGoold, Susan Dorr (2002). "Trust, Distrust and Trustworthiness." Journal of General Internal Medicine 17(1): 79-81. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73481>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0884-8734en_US
dc.identifier.issn1525-1497en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73481
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=11903779&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent53672 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Science Incen_US
dc.rightsBlackwell Science Incen_US
dc.titleTrust, Distrust and Trustworthinessen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Mich.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid11903779en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73481/1/j.1525-1497.2002.11132.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.11132.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of General Internal Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKramer RM & Tyler TR, eds. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1996.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCook KS, ed. Trust in Society. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2001.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHosmer LT. Trust: the connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Acad Mgmt Rev. 1995; 20: 379 – 403.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRuppel CP & Harrington SJ. The relationship of communication, ethical work climate, and trust to commitment and innovation. J Bus Ethics. 2000; 25: 313 – 28.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHawe P & Shiell A. Social capital and health promotion: a review. Soc Sci Med. 2000; 51: 871 – 85.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFukuyama F. Trust: Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press; 1995: 457.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLehrer K. Knowledge and the trustworthiness of instruments. The Monist. 1995; 78: 156 – 70.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMollering G. The nature of trust: from Georg Simmel to a theory of expectation, interpretation and suspension. Sociology. 2001; 35: 403 – 20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSeligman A. The Problem of Trust. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1997.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarber B. The Logic and Limits of Trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press; 1983.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLagerspetz O. Trust: The Tacit Demand. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1998.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMechanic D. The impact of managed care on patients' trust in medical care and their physicians. JAMA. 1996; 275: 1693 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDaniels N. Just Health Care: Studies in Philosophy and Health Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1985.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePellegrino ED & Thomasma DC. Fidelity to trust. In: The Virtues in Medical Practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRhodes R & Strain J. Trust and transforming medical institutions. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2000; 9: 205 – 17.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrody H. The Healer's Power. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1992.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDunn L & Perry BL. Where your patients are. Prim Care. 1997; 24: 715 – 21.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHyyppa MT & Maki J. Individual-level relationships between social capital and self-rated health in a bilingual community. Prev Med. 2001; 32: 148 – 55.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLau JT, Yu A, Cheung JC, Leung SS. Studies on common illnesses and medical care utilization patterns of adolescents in Hong Kong. J Adolesc Health. 2000; 27: 443 – 52.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSafran DG, Taira DA, Rogers WH, Kosinski M, Ware JE, Tarlov AR. Linking primary care performance to outcomes of care. J Fam Pract. 1998; 47: 213 – 20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMostashari F, Riley E, Selwyn PA, Altice FL. Acceptance and adherence with antiretroviral therapy among HIV-infected women in a correctional facility. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1998; 18: 341 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFaden R & Beauchamp T. A History and Theory of Informed Consent. New York: Oxford University Press; 1986: 274 – 80.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeating NL, Green DC, Kao AC, Gazmararian JA, Wu VY, Cleary PD. How are patients' specific ambulatory care experiences related to trust, satisfaction, and considering changing physicians? J Gen Intern Med. 2002; 17: 29 – 39.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrumbach K, Selby JV, Damberg C, et al. Resolving the gatekeeper conundrum: what patients value in primary care and referrals to specialists. JAMA. 1999; 282: 261 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWade R. Reality Check. American Hospital Association; 1996.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoold SD & Klipp G. Managed care members talk about trust. Soc Sci Med. In press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceForman JH. The Physician-Patient Relationship: Views of Adults with Life-Threatening Illness (dissertation). Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University; 2001.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCooper-Patrick L, Powe NR, Jenckes MW, Gonzales JJ, Levine DM, Ford DE. Identification of patient attitudes and preferences regarding treatment of depression. J Gen Intern Med. 1997; 12: 431 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKulwicki A. An ethnographic study of illness perceptions and practices of Yemeni-Arabs in Michigan. J Cultural Diversity. 1996; 3: 80 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWinters CA. Heart failure: living with uncertainty. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. 1999; 14: 85 – 91.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO'Malley AS & Forrest CB. Beyond the examination room: primary care performance and the patient-physician relationship for low-income women. J Gen Intern Med. 2002; 17: 66 – 73.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKao AC, Green DC, Zaslavsky AM, Koplan JP, Cleary PD. The relationship between method of physician payment and patient trust. JAMA. 1998; 280: 1708 – 14.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCorbie-Smith G, St George D, Thomas S. Distrust, race and research. (Abstract) J Gen Intern Med. 2001; 16: 124S.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSafran DG, Kosinski M, Tarlov AR, et al. The Primary Care Assessment Survey: tests of data quality and measurement performance. Med Care. 1998; 36: 728 – 39.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKao AC, Green DC, Davis NA, Koplan JP, Cleary PD. Patients' trust in their physicians: effects of choice, continuity, and payment method. J Gen Intern Med. 1998; 13: 681 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHall MA, Zheng B, Dugan E, et al. Measuring patients' trust in their primary care providers. Med Care Res Rev. In press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson LA & Dedrick RF. Development of the trust in physician scale: a measure to assess interpersonal trust in patient-physician relationships. Psychol Rep. 1990; 67: 1091 – 100.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHall MA, Dugan E, Zheng B, Mishra AK. Trust in physicians and medical institutions: what is it, can it be measured, and does it matter? Milbank Q. In press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoold SD & Fessler D. Development of an instrument to measure trust in health insurers. (Abstract) J Gen Intern Med. 2000; 15: 118S – 119S.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZheng B, Hall MA, Dugan E, Kidd KE, Levine D. Development of a scale to measure patients' trust in health insurers. Health Serv Res. In press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKramer RM & Tyler TR, eds. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1996.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchneider CE. The Practice of Autonomy: Patients, Doctors, and Medical Decisions. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAxelrod D & Goold SD. Maintaining trust in the surgeon-patient relationship: challenges for the new millennium. Arch Surg. 2000; 135: 55 – 61.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScott RA, Aiken LH, Mechanic D. Organizational aspects of caring. Milbank Q. 1995; 73: 77 – 95.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJoffe JS. Trust, Involvement in Decisions, and Respect for Persons Among Hospitalized Patients (abstract). American Society for Bioethics and Humanities, Fourth Annual Meeting, October 25–28, 2001, Nashville, Tenn. Session code number R2: 58 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThom DH, Bloch DA, Segal ES. An intervention to increase patients' trust in their physicians. Stanford Trust Study Physician Group. Acad Med. 1999; 74: 195 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCorbie-Smith G, Thomas SB, Williams MV, Moody-Ayers S. Attitudes and beliefs of African Americans toward participation in medical research. J Gen Intern Med. 1999; 14: 537 – 46.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWynia MK, Zucker D, Supran S, Selker HP. Patient protection and risk selection: do primary care physicians encourage their patients to join or avoid capitated health plans according to the patients' health status? J Gen Intern Med. 2002; 17: 40 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePearson SD & Hyams T. Talking about money: how primary care physicians respond to a patient's question about financial incentives. J Gen Intern Med. 2002; 17: 74 – 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoold SD. Trust and the ethics of healthcare organizations. Hastings Cent Rep. In press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePearson SD & Raeke LH. Patients' trust in physicians: many theories, few measures, and little data. J Gen Intern Med. 2000; 15: 509 – 13.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1525-1497.2002.11132.x.pdf
Size:
52.41KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.