Show simple item record

Evaluation of a novel precision template-guided biopsy system for detecting prostate cancer

dc.contributor.authorMegwalu, Ifeanyichukwu I.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFerguson, Genoa G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWei, John T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMouraviev, Vladimiren_US
dc.contributor.authorPolascik, Thomas J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTaneja, Samiren_US
dc.contributor.authorBlack, Lindaen_US
dc.contributor.authorAndriole, Gerald L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKibel, Adam S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T20:23:11Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T20:23:11Z
dc.date.issued2008-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationMegwalu, Ifeanyichukwu I.; Ferguson, Genoa G.; Wei, John T.; Mouraviev, Vladimir; Polascik, Thomas J.; Taneja, Samir; Black, Linda; Andriole, Gerald L.; Kibel, Adam S. (2008). "Evaluation of a novel precision template-guided biopsy system for detecting prostate cancer." BJU International 102(5): 546-550. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73501>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1464-4096en_US
dc.identifier.issn1464-410Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73501
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=18694408&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractTo explore the ability of a novel transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) device (TargetScan TM , Envisioneering Medical Technologies, St. Louis MO) that creates a three-dimensional map of the prostate and calculates an optimal biopsy scheme, to accurately sample the prostate and define the true extent of disease, as standard TRUS-guided prostate biopsy relies on the operator to distribute the biopsy sites, often resulting in under- and oversampling regions of the gland. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a multicentre retrospective chart review evaluating patients who had a TargetScan prostate biopsy between January 2006 and June 2007, we determined the overall cancer detection rate in all patients and in subgroups based on prostate specific antigen level, digital rectal examination, and indication for biopsy. We assessed the pathological significance of cancer detected, defined as a Gleason score of ≥7, positive margins, extracapsular disease or >20% tumour volume in the prostatectomy specimen. We also evaluated the concordance in Gleason score between the biopsy and prostatectomy specimen. RESULTS Cancer was detected in 50 (35.7%) of the 140 patients biopsied, including 39 (47.6%) with no previous biopsies. Of 23 prostatectomy specimens, 20 (87%) had pathologically significant disease. The biopsy predicted the prostatectomy Gleason score in 12 patients (52%), overestimated in two (9%), underestimated in eight (35%), and biopsy Gleason score could not be assigned in one (4%). CONCLUSIONS Template-guided biopsy potentially produces a higher cancer detection rate and more accurate assessment of grade. Prostatectomy specimens did not have a high rate of pathologically insignificant disease.en_US
dc.format.extent215346 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights© 2008 BJU Internationalen_US
dc.subject.otherProstatic Neoplasmsen_US
dc.subject.otherDiagnosisen_US
dc.subject.otherBiopsyen_US
dc.subject.otherSamplingen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of a novel precision template-guided biopsy system for detecting prostate canceren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI,en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationother* Division of Urology,en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherSiteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO,en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDivision of Urology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, anden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Urology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid18694408en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73501/1/j.1464-410X.2008.07832.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07832.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceBJU Internationalen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJemal A, Siegel R, Ward E et al. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin 2007; 57: 43 – 66en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTarone RE, Chu KC, Brawley OW. Implications of stage-specific survival rates in assessing recent declines in prostate cancer mortality rates. Epidemiology 2000; 11: 167 – 70en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndriole GL, Bullock TL, Belani JS et al. Is there a better way to biopsy the prostate? Prospects for a novel transrectal systematic biopsy approach. Urology 2007; 70: 22 – 6en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLoch T. Urologic imaging for localized prostate cancer in 2007. World J Urol 2007; 25: 121 – 9en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFreedland SJ, Aronson WJ, Csathy GS et al. Comparison of percentage of total prostate needle biopsy tissue with cancer to percentage of cores with cancer for predicting PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the SEARCH database. Urology 2003; 61: 742 – 7en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePresti JC Jr. Prostate biopsy: how many cores are enough? Urol Oncol 2003; 21: 135 – 40en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePresti JC Jr, Chang JJ, Bhargava V, Shinohara K. The optimal systematic prostate biopsy scheme should include 8 rather than 6 biopsies: results of a prospective clinical trial. J Urol 2000; 163: 163 – 6en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePresti JC Jr, O’Dowd GJ, Miller MC, Mattu R, Veltri RW. Extended peripheral zone biopsy schemes increase cancer detection rates and minimize variance in prostate specific antigen and age related cancer rates: results of a community multi-practice study. J Urol 2003; 169: 125 – 9en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaaijmakers R, Kirkels WJ, Roobol MJ, Wildhagen MF, Schroder FH. Complication rates and risk factors of 5802 transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant biopsies of the prostate within a population-based screening program. Urology 2002; 60: 826 – 30en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiddiqui EJ, Ali S, Koneru S. The rectal administration of lignocaine gel and periprostatic lignocaine infiltration during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy provides effective analgesia. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2006; 88: 218 – 21en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencede Jesus CM, Correa LA, Padovani CR. Complications and risk factors in transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies. Sao Paulo Med J 2006; 124: 198 – 202en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEtzioni R, Penson DF, Legler JM et al. Overdiagnosis due to prostate-specific antigen screening: lessons from U.S. prostate cancer incidence trends. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 94: 981 – 90en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKozlowski P, Chang SD, Jones EC, Berean KW, Chen H, Goldenberg SL. Combined diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis – correlation with biopsy and histopathology. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24: 108 – 13en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKumar V, Jagannathan NR, Kumar R et al. Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of prostate voxels identified as suspicious of malignancy on three-dimensional (1)H MR spectroscopic imaging in patients with abnormal digital rectal examination or raised prostate specific antigen level of 4–10 ng/mL. N MR Biomed 2007; 20: 11 – 20en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGore JL, Shariat SF, Miles BJ et al. Optimal combinations of systematic sextant and laterally directed biopsies for the detection of prostate cancer. J Urol 2001; 165: 1554 – 9en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuichard G, Larre S, Gallina A et al. Extended 21-sample needle biopsy protocol for diagnosis of prostate cancer in 1000 consecutive patients. Eur Urol 2007; 52: 430 – 5en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNaughton CK, Miller DC, Mager DE, Ornstein DK, Catalona WJ. A prospective randomized trial comparing 6 versus 12 prostate biopsy cores: impact on cancer detection. J Urol 2000; 164: 388 – 92en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEpstein JI, Walsh PC, Carmichael M, Brendler CB. Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer. JAMA 1994; 271: 368 – 74en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMian BM, Lehr DJ, Moore CK et al. Role of prostate biopsy schemes in accurate prediction of Gleason scores. Urology 2006; 67: 379 – 83en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRemzi M, Fong YK, Dobrovits M et al. The Vienna Nomogram. Validation of a novel biopsy strategy defining the optimal number of cores based on patient age and total prostate volume. J Urol 2005; 174: 1256 – 60en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.