View Item 

Show simple item record

Nonantagonistic interactions between the sexes revealed by the ecological consequences of reproductive traits
dc.contributor.authorLacey Knowles, L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBrodie Hernandez, B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMarkow, T. A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T20:23:22Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T20:23:22Z
dc.date.issued2005-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationLacey Knowles, L.; Brodie Hernandez, B.; Markow, T. A. (2005). "Nonantagonistic interactions between the sexes revealed by the ecological consequences of reproductive traits ." Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18(1): 156-161. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73504>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1010-061Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1420-9101en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73504
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=15669972&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent179184 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Science Ltden_US
dc.rights2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.subject.otherAntagonistic Coevolutionen_US
dc.subject.otherPost-mating–Prezygotic Interactionsen_US
dc.subject.otherSexual Selectionen_US
dc.titleNonantagonistic interactions between the sexes revealed by the ecological consequences of reproductive traitsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationum* Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationother† Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid15669972en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73504/1/j.1420-9101.2004.00779.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00779.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndrÉs, J.A. & Arnqvist, G. 2001. Genetic divergence of the seminal signal-receptor system in houseflies: the footprints of sexually antagonistic coevolution ? Proc. R. Soc. London B 268: 399 – 405.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBertram, M.J., Neubaum, D.M. & Wolfner, M.F. 1996. Localization of the Drosophila male accessory gland protein Acp36DE in the mated female suggests a role in sperm storage. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 26: 971 – 980.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBreitmeyer, C.M. & Markow, T.A. 1988. Resource availability and population size in cactophilic Drosophila. Funct. Ecol. 12: 14 – 21.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCivetta, A. & Clark, A.G. 2000. Correlated effects of sperm competition and postmating female mortality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 13162 – 13165.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCivetta, A. & Singh, R.S. 1995. High divergence of reproductive tract proteins and their association with postzygotic reproductive isolation in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis group species. J. Mol. Evol. 41: 1085 – 1095.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClark, A.G. & Begun, D.J. 1998. Female genotypes affect sperm displacement in Drosophila. Genetics 149: 1487 – 1493.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClark, A.G., Dermitzakis, E.T. & Civetta, A. 2000. Nontransitivity of sperm precedence in Drosophila. Evolution 54: 1030 – 1035.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCordero, C. & Eberhard, W.G. 2003. Female choice of sexually antagonistic male adaptations: a critical review of some current research. J. Evol. Biol. 16: 1 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEberhard, W.G. 1996. Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEberhard, W.G. & Cordero, C. 2003. Sexual conflict and female choice. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18: 438 – 439.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEmlen, D.J. 2001. Costs and the diversification of exaggerated animal structures. Science 291: 1534 – 1536.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFowler, K. & Partridge, L. 1989. A cost of mating in female fruitflies. Nature 338: 760 – 761.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFu, P., Neff, B.D. & Gross, M.R. 2001. Tactic-specific success in sperm competition. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 1105 – 1112.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGavrilets, S. & Waxman, D. 2002. Sympatric speciation by sexual conflict. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 10533 – 10538.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGross, M.R. & Charnov, E.L. 1980. Alternative male life histories in bluegill sunfish. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77: 693 – 6940.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHadley, N.F. 1994. Water Relations of Terrestrial Arthropods. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeed, W.B. 1978. Ecology and genetics of Sonoran Desert Drosophila. In: Ecological Genetics at the Interface ( P. Brussard, ed. ), pp. 109 – 126. Springer, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolland, B. & Rice, W.R. 1999. Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 5083 – 5088.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKnowles, L.L. & Markow, T.A. 2001. Sexually antagonistic coevolution of a postmating-prezygotic reproductive character in desert Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 8692 – 8696.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKnowles, L.L., Hernandez, B.B. & Markow, T.A. 2004. Exploring the consequences of postmating-prezygotic interactions between the sexes. Proc. Royal. Soc. Lond. B (Suppl), DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2004.0192.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKubli, E. 1996. The Drosophila sex peptide: A peptide pheromone involved in reproduction. In: Advances in Developmental Biochemistry, Vol. 4 ( P. Wasserman, ed. ), pp. 99 – 129. JAI Press, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKurdziel, J.P. & Knowles, L.L. 2002. Mechanisms of morph determination in the marine amphipod Jassa: implications for the evolution of alternative phenotypes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269: 1749 – 1754.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarkow, T.A. & Castrezana, S. 2000. Dispersal in cactophilic Drosophila. Oikos 89: 378 – 386.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePartridge, L. & Hurst, L.D. 1998. Sex and conflict. Science 281: 2003 – 2008.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePitnick, S., Markow, T. & Spicer, G.S. 1999. Evolution of multiple kinds of female sperm-storage organs in Drosophila. Evolution 53: 1804 – 1822.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRice, W.R. 1996. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381: 232 – 234.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRichmond, R.C., Nielsen, K.M., Brady, J.P. & Snella, E.M. 1990. Physiology, biochemistry and moldculr biology of the Est-6 locus in Drosophila melanogaster. In: Ecological and Evolutionary Genetics of Drosophila ( J. S. F. Barker, W. T. Starmer & R. J. MacIntyre, eds ), pp. 273 – 289. Plenum Press, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRowe, L., Cameron, E. & Day, T. 2003. Detecting sexually antagonistic coevolution with population crosses. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270: 2009 – 2016.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwanson, W.J., Clark, A.G., Waldrip-Dali, H.M., Wolfner, M.F. & Aquadro, C.F. 2001. Evolutionary EST analysis identifies rapidly evolving male reproductive proteins in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 7375 – 7379.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWolfner, M.F. 2002. The gifts that keep on giving: physiological functions and evolutionary dynamics of male seminal proteins in Drosophila. Heredity. 88: 85 – 93.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1420-9101.2004.00779.x.pdf
Size:
174.9KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.