Show simple item record

Protein intake by gypsy moth larvae on homogeneous and heterogeneous diets

dc.contributor.authorStockhoff, Brian A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T20:23:25Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T20:23:25Z
dc.date.issued1993-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationSTOCKHOFF, BRIAN A. (1993). "Protein intake by gypsy moth larvae on homogeneous and heterogeneous diets." Physiological Entomology 18(4): 409-419. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73505>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0307-6962en_US
dc.identifier.issn1365-3032en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73505
dc.description.abstractFood selection behaviour, food utilization efficiency and growth performance of a generalist insect, the gypsy moth ( Lymantria dispar (L.), Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae), were examined with respect to variation in food nitrogen concentration. The results suggest that gypsy moth do not suffer physiologically and in fact may benefit from intraplant variation by selective feeding. When provided with diet cubes containing identical nitrogen concentrations, control larvae tended to consume food from a single cube. This behaviour contrasted with that of larvae provided cubes differing in nitrogen concentration. These larvae tended to consume more from the high nitrogen cube, but allocated feeding more evenly among diet cubes than did control larvae. Overall, larvae mixed foods so as to obtain a mean concentration of 2.9-3.2% nitrogen, a concentration assumed to approximate the ’intake target’. Larvae confined to single nitrogen concentrations mitigated the impact of imbalanced diets on body composition via both pre-ingestive and post-ingestive compensation. When confined to a specific nitrogen concentration, larvae adjusted their intake to the point of best compromise. In this case, this was the geometrically closest point to the estimated intake target. Larvae with a choice of foods that deviated more than ±1% from each other in nitrogen concentration grew as well as or better than larvae without a choice but given identical mean nitrogen concentrations. These results demonstrate that selectivity and nitrogen consumption by gypsy moth larvae are altered according to the particular choices available. Insects may benefit from intraplant variation in food quality because such variation provides the opportunity to choose foods and mix them in ways that permit close matching with the intake target. Variation may be particularly important to insects which must offset changing nutritional demands.en_US
dc.format.extent1130263 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights1993 Royal Entomological Societyen_US
dc.subject.otherCompensatory Feedingen_US
dc.subject.otherGypsy Mothen_US
dc.subject.otherNutritionen_US
dc.subject.otherNitrogenen_US
dc.subject.otherDiet Heterogeneityen_US
dc.subject.otherVariabilityen_US
dc.subject.otherForaging Behaviouren_US
dc.subject.otherLymantria Dispar.en_US
dc.titleProtein intake by gypsy moth larvae on homogeneous and heterogeneous dietsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPhysiologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, U.S.A.en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73505/1/j.1365-3032.1993.tb00615.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-3032.1993.tb00615.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourcePhysiological Entomologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBernays, E.A. & Bright, K.L. ( 1991 ) Dietary mixing in grasshoppers: switching induced by nutritional imbalances in foods. Entornologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 61, 247 – 253.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChesson, J. ( 1983 ) The estimation and analysis of preference and its relationship to foraging models. Ecology, 64, 1297 – 1304.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen, R.W., Heydon, S.L., Waldbauer, G.P. & Friedman, S. ( 1987a ). Nutrient self-selection by the omnivorous cockroach Supella longipalpa. Journal of Insect Physiology, 33, 77 – 82.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen, R.W., Waldbauer, G.P., Friedman, S. & Schiff, N.M. ( 1987b ). Nutrient self-selection by Heliothis zea larvae: a time-lapse film study. Entornologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 44, 65 – 73.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGulmon, S.L. & Chu, C.C. ( 1981 ) The effects of light and nitrogen on photosynthesis, leaf characteristics, and dry matter allocation in the chaparral shrub Diplacus aurantiacus. Oecologia, 49, 207 – 212.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHollinger, D.Y. ( 1989 ) Canopy organization and foliage synthetic capacity in a broad-leaved evergreen montane forest. Functional Ecology, 3, 53 – 62.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLechowicz, M.J. ( 1982 ) The sampling characteristics of electivity indices. Oecologia, 52, 22 – 30.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartin, M.M. &, Van't Hof, H.M. ( 1988 ) The cause of reduced growth of Manduca sexta larvae on a low-water diet: increased metabolic processing costs or nutrient limitation ? Journal of Insect Physiology, 34, 515 – 525.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcFarland, D.J. & Sibly, R. ( 1972 ) 'Unitary drives' revisited. Animal Behavior, 20, 548 – 563.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOdell, T.M., Butt, C.A. & Bridgeforth, A.W. ( 1985 ) Lymantria dispar. Handbook of Insect Rearing, Vol. 2 ( P. Singh and R. F. Moore ), pp. 355 – 367. Elsevier, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaubenheimer, D. &, Simpson, S.J. ( 1993 ) The geometry of compensatory feeding in the locust. Animal Behaviour, in press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchiff, N.M., Waldbauer, G.P. & Friedman, S. ( 1988 ) Dietary self-selection for vitamins and lipid by larvae of the corn car-worm, Heliothis zea. Entornologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 46, 240 – 256.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmidt, D.J. & Reese, J.C. ( 1986 ) Sources of error in nutritional index studies of insects on artificial diet. Journal of Insect Physiology, 32, 193 – 198.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchultz, J.C. ( 1983 ) Habitat selection and foraging tactics of caterpillars in heterogeneous trees. Variable Plants and Herbivores in Natural and Managed Systems ( R. F. Denno and M. S. McClurc ), pp. 61 – 90. Academic Press, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScriber, J.M. ( 1984 ) Host-plant suitability. Chemical Ecology of Insects ( W. J. Bell and R. T. Carde ), pp. 159 – 202. Chapman & Hall, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScriber, J.M. & Slansky, F., Jr ( 1981 ) The nutritional ecology of immature insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 298, 183 – 211.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSibly, R. & McFarland, D.J. ( 1974 ) A state-space approach to motivation. Methods of Motivational Control System Analysis ( D. J. McFarland ), pp. 213 – 250. Academic Press, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimpson, S.J. & Simpson, C.L. ( 1990 ) The mechanisms of compensation by phytophagous insects. Insect–Plant Interactions ( E. A. Bernays ), pp. 111 – 160. CRC Press, Boca Raton.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSlansky, F. Jr, Scriber, J.M. ( 1985 ) Food consumption and utilization. Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Vol. 4 ( G. A. Kerkut and L. I. Gilbert ), pp. 87 – 163. Pergamon Press, Oxford.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStockhoff, B.A. ( 1992 ) Diet heterogeneity: effects on gypsy moth feeding behavior and growth. Doctoral dissertation. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStockhoff, B.A. ( 1993a ). Diet heterogeneity: implications for growth of a generalist herbivore, the gypsy moth. Ecology, in press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStockhoff, B.A. ( 1993b ). Ontogenetic change in dietary selection for protein and lipid by gypsy moth larvae. Journal of Insect Physiology, in press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTilman, D. ( 1980 ) Resources: a graphical-mechanistic approach to competition and predation. American Naturalist, 116, 362 – 393.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Loon, J.J.A. ( 1991 ) Measuring food utilization in plant-feeding insects: toward a metabolic and dynamic approach. Insect-Plant Interactions ( E. A. Bernays ), pp. 79 – 124. CRC Press, Boca Raton.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Valen, L. ( 1978 ) The statistics of variation. Evolutionary Theory, 4, 33 – 43.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWaldbauer, G.P. ( 1968 ) The consumption and utilization of food by insects. Advances in Insect Physiology, 5, 229 – 288.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWaldbauer, G.P., Cohen, R.W. & Friedman, S. ( 1984 ) Self-selection of an optimal nutrient mix from defined diets by larvae of the corn earworm, Heliothis zea (Boddie). Physiological Zoology, 57, 590 – 597.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWaldbauer, G.P. & Friedman, S. ( 1988 ) Dietary self-selection by insects. Endocrinological Frontiers in Physiological Insect Ecology ( F. Sehnal, A. Zabza and D. L. Denlinger ), pp. 403 – 422. Wroclaw Technical University Press, Wroclaw.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWaldbauer, G.P. & Friedman, S. ( 1991 ) Self-selection of optimal diets by insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 36, 43 – 63.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.