Show simple item record

The Relative Importance of Physician Communication, Participatory Decision Making, and Patient Understanding in Diabetes Self-management

dc.contributor.authorHeisler, Michele M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBouknight, Reynard R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHayward, Rodney A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Dylan M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKerr, Eve A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T20:27:10Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T20:27:10Z
dc.date.issued2002-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationHeisler, Michele; Bouknight, Reynard R.; Hayward, Rodney A.; Smith, Dylan M.; Kerr, Eve A. (2002). "The Relative Importance of Physician Communication, Participatory Decision Making, and Patient Understanding in Diabetes Self-management." Journal of General Internal Medicine 17(4): 243-252. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73566>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0884-8734en_US
dc.identifier.issn1525-1497en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73566
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=11972720&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractPatients' self-management practices have substantial consequences on morbidity and mortality in diabetes. While the quality of patient-physician relations has been associated with improved health outcomes and functional status, little is known about the impact of different patient-physician interaction styles on patients' diabetes self-management. This study assessed the influence of patients' evaluation of their physicians' participatory decision-making style, rating of physician communication, and reported understanding of diabetes self-care on their self-reported diabetes management. DESIGN: We surveyed 2,000 patients receiving diabetes care across 25 Veterans' Affairs facilities. We measured patients' evaluation of provider participatory decision making with a 4-item scale (Provider Participatory Decision-making Style [PDMstyle]; = 0.96), rating of providers' communication with a 5-item scale (Provider Communication [PCOM]; = 0.93), understanding of diabetes self-care with an 8-item scale ( = 0.90), and patients' completion of diabetes self-care activities (self-management) in 5 domains ( = 0.68). Using multivariable linear regression, we examined self-management with the independent associations of PDMstyle, PCOM, and Understanding. RESULTS: Sixty-six percent of the sample completed the surveys ( N = 1,314). Higher ratings in PDMstyle and PCOM were each associated with higher self-management assessments ( P < .01 in all models). When modeled together, PCOM remained a significant independent predictor of self-management (standardized : 0.18; P < .001), but PDMstyle became nonsignificant. Adding Understanding to the model diminished the unique effect of PCOM in predicting self-management (standardized : 0.10; P = .004). Understanding was strongly and independently associated with self-management (standardized : 0.25; P < .001). CONCLUSION: For these patients, ratings of providers' communication effectiveness were more important than a participatory decision-making style in predicting diabetes self-management. Reported understanding of self-care behaviors was highly predictive of and attenuated the effect of both PDMstyle and PCOM on self-management, raising the possibility that both provider styles enhance self-management through increased patient understanding or self-confidence.en_US
dc.format.extent208256 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Science Incen_US
dc.rights2002 by the Society of General Internal Medicineen_US
dc.subject.otherPhysician-patient Relationsen_US
dc.subject.otherDisease Managementen_US
dc.subject.otherSelf-careen_US
dc.subject.otherAmbulatory Careen_US
dc.subject.otherChronic Diseaseen_US
dc.titleThe Relative Importance of Physician Communication, Participatory Decision Making, and Patient Understanding in Diabetes Self-managementen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.pmid11972720en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73566/1/j.1525-1497.2002.10905.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10905.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of General Internal Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGlasgow RE, Wagner EH, Kaplan RM, Vinicor F, Smith L, Norman J. If diabetes is a public health problem, why not treat it as one? A population-based approach to chronic illness. Ann Behav Med. 1999; 21: 159 70.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEtzwiler DD. Chronic care: a need in search of a system. Diabetes Educ. 1997; 23: 569 73.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Milbank Q. 1996; 74: 511 44.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference4. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Research Group. Retinopathy and nephropathy in patients with type 1 diabetes four years after a trial of intensive therapy. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342: 381 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference5. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. BMJ. 1998; 317: 703 13.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference6. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet. 1998; 352: 854 65.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference7. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS). Relative efficacy of randomly allocated diet, sulphonylurea, insulin, or metformin in patients with newly diagnosed non-insulin dependent diabetes followed for three years. BMJ. 1995; 310: 83 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePyorala K, Pedersen TR, Kjekshus J, Faergeman O, Olsson AG, Thorgeirsson G. Cholesterol lowering with simvastatin improves prognosis of diabetic patients with coronary heart disease. A subgroup analysis of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Diabetes Care. 1997; 20: 614 20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarris MI. Health care and health status and outcomes for patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2000; 23: 754 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGlasgow RE, Hampson SE, Strycker LA, Ruggiero L. Personal-model beliefs and social-environmental barriers related to diabetes self-management. Diabetes Care. 1997; 20: 556 61.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLorenz RA, Bubb J, Davis D, et al. Changing behavior. Practical lessons from the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes Care. 1996; 19: 648 52.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGlasgow RE, Strycker LA. Preventive care practices for diabetes management in two primary care samples. Am J Prev Med. 2000; 19: 9 14.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHunt LM, Pugh J, Valenzuela M. How patients adapt diabetes self-care recommendations in everyday life. J Fam Pract. 1998; 46: 207 15.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcNabb WL. Adherence in diabetes: can we define it and can we measure it? Diabetes Care. 1997; 20: 215 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLutfey KE, Wishner WJ. Beyond "compliance" is "adherence". Improving the prospect of diabetes care. Diabetes Care. 1999; 22: 635 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKravitz RL, Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, et al. Recall of recommendations and adherence to advice among patients with chronic medical conditions. Arch Intern Med. 1993; 153: 1869 78.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosenstock IM. Enhancing patient compliance with health recommendations. J Pediatr Health Care. 1988; 2: 67 72.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson RM, Funnell MM. Compliance and adherence are dysfunctional concepts in diabetes care. Diabetes Educ. 2000; 26: 597 604.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVon Korff M, Gruman J, Schaefer J, Curry SJ, Wagner EH. Collaborative management of chronic illness. Ann Intern Med. 1997; 127: 1097 102.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClark NM, Gong M. Management of chronic disease by practitioners and patients: are we teaching the wrong things? BMJ. 2000; 320: 572 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolman H, Lorig K. Patients as partners in managing chronic disease. Partnership is a prerequisite for effective and efficient health care. BMJ. 2000; 320: 526 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLorig KR, Sobel DS, Stewart AL, et al. Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization: a randomized trial. Med Care. 1999; 37: 5 14.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLaine C, Davidoff F. Patient-centered medicine. A professional evolution. JAMA. 1996; 275: 152 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGlasgow RE, Anderson RM. In diabetes care, moving from compliance to adherence is not enough. Something entirely different is needed. Diabetes Care. 1999; 22: 2090 2.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLaine C, Caro JF. Preventing complications in diabetes mellitus: the role of the primary care physician. Med Clin North Am. 1996; 80: 457 74.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiMatteo MR. The physician-patient relationship: effects on the quality of health care. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 37: 149 61.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware JE Jr. Expanding patient involvement in care. Effects on patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 1985; 102: 520 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSherbourne CD, Hays RD, Ordway L, DiMatteo MR, Kravitz RL. Antecedents of adherence to medical recommendations: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. J Behav Med. 1992; 15: 447 68.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaplan SH, Greenfield S, Ware JE Jr. Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care. 1989; 27 ( 3 Suppl ): 110S 127S.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ. 1995; 152: 1423 33.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliams GC, Freedman ZR, Deci EL. Supporting autonomy to motivate patients with diabetes for glucose control. Diabetes Care. 1998; 21: 1644 51.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson RM, Funnell MM, Butler PM, Arnold MS, Fitzgerald JT, Feste CC. Patient empowerment. Results of a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 1995; 18: 943 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreenfield S, Kaplan SH, Ware JE Jr, Yano EM, Frank HJ. Patients' participation in medical care: effects on blood sugar control and quality of life in diabetes. J Gen Intern Med. 1988; 3: 448 57.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClark NM, Janz NK, Dodge JA, et al. Changes in functional health status of older women with heart disease: evaluation of a program based on self-regulation. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2000; 55: 117S 26S.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHays RD, Kravitz RL, Mazel RM, et al. The impact of patient adherence on health outcomes for patients with chronic disease in the Medical Outcomes Study. J Behav Med. 1994; 17: 347 60.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClark NM, Dodge JA. Exploring self-efficacy as a predictor of disease management. Health Educ Behav. 1999; 26: 72 89.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerger M, Muhlhause I. Diabetes care and patient-oriented outcomes. JAMA. 1999; 281: 1676 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOlivarius N, Beck-Neilson H, Andreasen AH, Hoder M, Pedersen PA. Randomized controlled trial of structured personal care of type 2 diabetes mellitus. BMJ. 2001; 323: 1 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGolin CE, DiMatteo MR, Gelberg L. The role of patient participation in the doctor visit. Implications for adherence to diabetes care. Diabetes Care. 1996; 19: 1153 64.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSenecal C, Nouwen A, White D. Motivation and dietary self-care in adults with diabetes: are self-efficacy and autonomous self-regulation complementary or competing constructs? Health Psychol. 2000; 19: 452 7.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaplan SH, Greenfield S, Gandek B, Rogers WH, Ware JE Jr.. Characteristics of physicians with participatory decision-making styles. Ann Intern Med. 1996; 124: 497 504.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCooper-Patrick L, Gallo JJ, Gonzales JJ, et al. Race, gender, and partnership in the patient-physician relationship. JAMA. 1999; 282: 583 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiMatteo MR. The role of the physician in the emerging health care environment. West J Med. 1998; 168: 328 33.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWolpert HA, Anderson BJ. Management of diabetes: are doctors framing the benefits from the wrong perspective? BMJ. 2001; 323: 994 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePogach LM, Hawley G, Weinstock R, et al. Diabetes prevalence and hospital and pharmacy use in the Veterans Health Administration (1994). Use of an ambulatory care pharmacy-derived database. Diabetes Care. 1998; 21: 368 73.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyko EJ, Koepsell TD, Gaziano JM, Horner RD, Feussner JR. US Department of Veterans Affairs medical care system as a resource to epidemiologists. Am J Epidemiol. 2000; 151: 307 14.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrein SL, Hayward RA, Pogach L, BootsMiller BJ. Department of Veterans Affairs' quality enhancement research initiative for diabetes mellitus. Med Care. 2000; 38 ( 6 Suppl 1 ): I38S 148S.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoodall TA, Halford WK. Self-management of diabetes mellitus: a critical review. Health Psychol. 1991; 10: 1 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClement S. Diabetes self-management education. Diabetes Care. 1995; 18: 1204 14.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaplan SH, Gandek B, Greenfield S, Rogers W, Ware JE. Patient and visit characteristics related to physicians' participatory decision-making style. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care. 1995; 33: 1176 87.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHayward RA, Manning WG, Kaplan SH, Wagner EH, Greenfield S. Starting insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: effectiveness, complications, and resource utilization. JAMA. 1997; 278: 1663 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGorsuch RL. Factor Analysis, 2nd Ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1983.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWagner EH, Glasgow RE, Davis C, et al. Quality improvement in chronic illness care: a collaborative approach. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2001; 27: 63 80.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeisecker AE, Beisecker TD. Patient information-seeking behaviors when communicating with doctors. Med Care. 1990; 28: 19 28.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeber RB, Kraetschmer N, Irvine J. What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making? Arch Intern Med. 1996; 156: 1414 20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStrull WM, Lo B, Charles G. Do patients want to participate in medical decision making? JAMA. 1984; 252: 2990 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWaitzkin H, Stoeckle JD. The communication of information about illness. Clinical, sociological, and methodological considerations. Adv Psychosom Med. 1972; 8: 180 215.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMansell D, Poses RM, Kazis L, Duefield CA. Clinical factors that influence patients' desire for participation in decisions about illness. Arch Intern Med. 2000; 160: 2991 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiMatteo MR, Sherbourne CD, Hays RD, et al. Physicians' characteristics influence patients' adherence to medical treatment: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Health Psychol. 1993; 12: 93 102.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliams GC, Grow VM, Freedman ZR, Ryan RM, Deci EL. Motivational predictors of weight loss and weight-loss maintenance. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996; 70: 115 26.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWagner EH. The role of patient care teams in chronic disease management. BMJ. 2000; 320: 569 72.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGlasgow RE. A practical model of diabetes management and education. Diabetes Care. 1995; 18: 117 26.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.