Risk Factors for Urinary Complications After Renal Transplantation
dc.contributor.author | Englesbe, Michael J. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Dubay, Derek A. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Gillespie, Brenda W. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Moyer, A. S. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Pelletier, Shawn J. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sung, Randall S. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Magee, John C. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Punch, Jeffery D. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Campbell, Darrell A. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Merion, Robert M. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-06-01T20:41:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-06-01T20:41:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2007-06 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Englesbe, M. J.; Dubay, D. A.; Gillespie, B. W.; Moyer, A. S.; Pelletier, S. J.; Sung, R. S.; Magee, J. C.; Punch, J. D.; Campbell, D. A.; Merion, R. M. (2007). "Risk Factors for Urinary Complications After Renal Transplantation." American Journal of Transplantation 7(6): 1536-1541. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73788> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1600-6135 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1600-6143 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73788 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=17430402&dopt=citation | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 77004 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3109 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd | en_US |
dc.rights | 2007 The Authors Journal compilation © 2007 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons | en_US |
dc.title | Risk Factors for Urinary Complications After Renal Transplantation | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Medicine (General) | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Health Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation and School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 17430402 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73788/1/j.1600-6143.2007.01790.x.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01790.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | American Journal of Transplantation | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Khauli RB, Ayvazian PJ. Modified extravesical ureteroneocystostomy and routine ureteral stenting in renal transplantation: Experience in 300 consecutive cases. Transplant Proc 2001; 33: 2665 – 2666. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Dominguez J, Clase CM, Mahalati K et al. Is routine ureteric stenting needed in kidney transplantation? A randomized trial. Transplantation 2000; 70: 597 – 601. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cimic J, Meuleman EJ, Oosterhof GO, Hoitsma AJ. Urological complications in renal transplantation. A comparison between living-related and cadaveric grafts. Eur Urol 1997; 31: 433 – 435. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bassiri A, Amiransari B, Yazdani M, Sesavar Y, Gol S. Renal transplantation using ureteral stents. Transplant Proc 1995; 27: 2593 – 2594. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Benoit G, Blanchet P, Eschwege P, Alexandre L, Bensadoun H, Charpentier B. Insertion of a double pigtail ureteral stent for the prevention of urological complications in renal transplantation: A prospective randomized study. J Urol 1996; 156: 881 – 884. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kumar A, Kumar R, Bhandari M. Significance of routine JJ stenting in living related renal transplantation: A prospective randomised study. Transplant Proc 1998; 30: 2995 – 2997. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Jaskowski A, Jones RM, Murie JA, Morris PJ. Urological complications in 600 consecutive renal transplants. Br J Surg 1987; 74: 922 – 925. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | French CG, Acott PD, Crocker JF, Bitter-Suermann H, Lawen JG. Extravesical ureteroneocystostomy with and without internalized ureteric stents in pediatric renal transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 2001; 5: 21 – 26. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mangus RS, Haag BW. Stented versus nonstented extravesical ureteroneocystostomy in renal transplantation: A metaanalysis. Am J Transplant 2004; 4: 1889 – 1896. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Pleass HC, Clark KR, Rigg KM et al. Urologic complications after renal transplantation: A prospective randomized trial comparing different techniques of ureteric anastomosis and the use of prophylactic ureteric stents. Transplant Proc 1995; 27: 1091 – 1092. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Rigg KM, Proud G, Taylor RM. Urological complications following renal transplantation. A study of 1016 consecutive transplants from a single centre. Transpl Int 1994; 7: 120 – 126. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Shoskes DA, Hanbury D, Cranston D, Morris PJ. Urological complications in 1,000 consecutive renal transplant recipients. J Urol 1995; 153: 18 – 21. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ohl DA, Konnak JW, Campbell DA, Dafoe DC, Merion RM, Turcotte JG. Extravesical ureteroneocystostomy in renal transplantation. J Urol 1988; 139: 499 – 502. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Secin FP, Rovegno AR, Marrugat RE, Virasoro R, Lautersztein GA, Fernandez H. Comparing Taguchi and Lich-Gregoir ureterovesical reimplantation techniques for kidney transplants. J Urol 2002; 168: 926 – 930. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Zomorrodi A, Bahluli A. Evaluation of urologic complications in 30 cases of kidney transplantation with technique of proper exposure edge of bladder mucosa and U-stitch ureteroneocystostomy. Transplant Proc 2003; 35: 2662 – 2663. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Modlin CS, Flechner SM, Boparai N, Goldfarb DA, Novick AC. U-stitch ureteroneocystostomy: A new renal transplantation ureteral reimplantation technique associated with reduced urologic complications. Tech Urol 2000; 6: 1 – 4. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sumrani NB, Lipkowitz GS, Hong JH, Hanson P, Butt KM. Complications of “one stitch” extravesical ureteric implantation in renal transplants in the cyclosporine and precyclosporine eras. Transplant Proc 1989; 21 ( 1 Pt 2 ): 1957 – 1959. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Port FK, Bragg-Gresham JL, Metzger RA et al. Donor characteristics associated with reduced graft survival: An approach to expanding the pool of kidney donors. Transplantation 2002; 74: 1281 – 1286. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Faenza A, Nardo B, Catena F et al. Ureteral stenosis after kidney transplantation. A study on 869 consecutive transplants. Transpl Int 1999; 12: 334 – 340. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Singh D, Lawen J, Alkhudair W. Does pretransplant obesity affect the outcome in kidney transplant recipients? Transplant Proc 2005; 37: 717 – 720. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Marks WH, Florence LS, Chapman PH, Precht AF, Perkinson DT. Morbid obesity is not a contraindication to kidney transplantation. Am J Surg 2004; 187: 635 – 638. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Philosophe B, Kuo PC, Schweitzer EJ et al. Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: Comparing ureteral complications in the recipients and improving the laparoscopic technique. Transplantation 1999; 68: 497 – 502. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Nogueira JM, Cangro CB, Fink JC et al. A comparison of recipient renal outcomes with laparoscopic versus open live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 1999; 67: 722 – 728. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kuo PC, Cho ES, Flowers JL, Jacobs S, Bartlett ST, Johnson LB. Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy and multiple renal arteries. Am J Surg 1998; 176: 559 – 563. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.