View Item 

Show simple item record

Clinical and histologic comparison of two different composite grafts for sinus augmentation: a pilot clinical trial
dc.contributor.authorGalindo-Moreno, Pabloen_US
dc.contributor.authorÁvila, Gustavoen_US
dc.contributor.authorFernández-Barbero, Juan Emilioen_US
dc.contributor.authorMesa, Franciscoen_US
dc.contributor.authorO'Valle-Ravassa, Franciscoen_US
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hom-Layen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T20:41:47Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T20:41:47Z
dc.date.issued2008-08en_US
dc.identifier.citationGalindo-Moreno, Pablo; Ávila, Gustavo; FernÁndez-Barbero, Juan Emilio; Mesa, Francisco; O'Valle-Ravassa, Francisco; Wang, Hom-Lay (2008). "Clinical and histologic comparison of two different composite grafts for sinus augmentation: a pilot clinical trial." Clinical Oral Implants Research 19(8): 755-759. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73800>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-0501en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73800
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=18573123&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground and objectives : Sinus augmentation is a procedure used for augmenting insufficient bone height that is often observed in the maxillary posterior areas. Many different techniques as well as bone graft regimens have been suggested for performing this procedure. It was the goal of this study to compare, clinically and histologically, two different composite grafting regimens used for sinus augmentation. Material and methods : Five patients, needing a bilateral sinus augmentation to allow implant placement, were recruited for this study. Right sinuses were grafted with cortical bone (collected from overlying the sinus membrane) and bovine hydroxyapatite (HA), while the left side sinuses were grafted with overlying autologous bone plus a bioglass (BG) material. Bone core biopsies were taken at 6 months after sinus graft or at the time of implant insertion. A waiting period of 6 additional months was granted to allow healing, before prosthetic restoration and functional loading. The level of peri-implant bone was evaluated 12 months after loading. A comparative histomorphometric analysis was conducted and a statistical analysis was performed. Results : All implants in both groups were functional after a 12-month loading period. No bone loss was observed radiographically or clinically in both groups. Histologic analysis revealed that both composite grafts had a high biocompatibility. In the bovine HA-containing group, minimal xenogenic graft absorption was noted. In contrast, BG group samples presented a high absorption rate with some remaining particles imbedded in new normal bone. Conclusions : Sinus augmentation using a combination of autogenous bone plus either bovine HA or BG is a predictable technique. To cite this article: Galindo-Moreno P, Ávila G, FernÁndez-Barbero JE, Mesa F, O'Valle-Ravassa F, Wang H-L. Clinical and histologic comparison of two different composite grafts for sinus augmentation: a pilot clinical trial. Clin. Oral Impl. Res . 19 , 2008; 755–759 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01536.xen_US
dc.format.extent730275 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rightsJournal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Munksgaard Ltden_US
dc.subject.otherBioglassesen_US
dc.subject.otherBovine Hydroxyapatiteen_US
dc.subject.otherDental Implantsen_US
dc.subject.otherSinus Augmentationen_US
dc.subject.otherSinus Graftingen_US
dc.titleClinical and histologic comparison of two different composite grafts for sinus augmentation: a pilot clinical trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherOral Surgery Department, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spainen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherHuman Anatomy and Embryology Department, School of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spainen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherPeriodontology Department, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spainen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherPathology Department, School of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spainen_US
dc.identifier.pmid18573123en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73800/1/j.1600-0501.2008.01536.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01536.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceClinical Oral Implants Researchen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlock, M.S., Kent, J.N., Kallukaran, F.U., Thunthy, K. & Weinberg, R. ( 1998 ) Bone maintenance 5 to 10 years after sinus grafting. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 56: 706 – 714 (discussion 714–705).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDel Fabbro, M., Testori, T., Francetti, L. & Weinstein, R. ( 2004 ) Systematic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus. The International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 24: 565 – 577.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEsposito, M., Grusovin, M.G., Coulthard, P. & Worthington, H.V. ( 2006 ) The efficacy of various bone augmentation procedures for dental implants: a Cochrane systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 21: 696 – 710.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFroum, S.J., Tarnow, D.P., Wallace, S.S., Rohrer, M.D. & Cho, S.C. ( 1998 ) Sinus floor elevation using anorganic bovine bone matrix (OsteoGraf/N) with and without autogenous bone: a clinical, histologic, radiographic, and histomorphometric analysis – Part 2 of an ongoing prospective study. The International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 18: 528 – 543.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFroum, S.J., Wallace, S.S., Elian, N., Cho, S.C. & Tarnow, D.P. ( 2006 ) Comparison of mineralized cancellous bone allograft (Puros) and anorganic bovine bone matrix (Bio-Oss) for sinus augmentation: histomorphometry at 26 to 32 weeks after grafting. The International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 26: 543 – 551.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalindo-Moreno, P., Avila, G., Fernandez-Barbero, J.E., Aguilar, M., Sanchez-Fernandez, E., Cutando, A. & Wang, H.L. ( 2007 ) Evaluation of sinus floor elevation using a composite bone graft mixture. Clinical Oral Implants Research 18: 376 – 382.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalindo-Moreno, P., Fauri, M., Avila-Ortiz, G., Fernandez-Barbero, J.E., Cabrera-Leon, A. & Sanchez-Fernandez, E. ( 2005 ) Influence of alcohol and tobacco habits on peri-implant marginal bone loss: a prospective study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 16: 579 – 586.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGatti, A.M., Simonetti, L.A., Monari, E., Guidi, S. & Greenspan, D. ( 2006 ) Bone augmentation with bioactive glass in three cases of dental implant placement. Journal of Biomaterials Applications 20: 325 – 339.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHallman, M., Sennerby, L. & Lundgren, S. ( 2002 ) A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20 : 80 mixture. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 17: 635 – 643.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJensen, O.T. & Greer, R. ( 1992 ) Immediate placing of osseointegrating implants into the maxillary sinus augmented with mineralized cancellous allograft and Gore-Tex: second stage surgical and histological findings. In: Laney, W.R. & Tolman, D.E., eds. Tissue Integration in Oral Orthopedic and Maxillofacial Reconstruction, 321 – 333. Chicago, IL: Quintenssence.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaufman, E. ( 2003 ) Maxillary sinus elevation surgery: an overview. Journal of Esthetics and Restorative Dentistry 15: 272 – 282 (discussion 283).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKhan, S.N., Bostrom, M.P. & Lane, J.M. ( 2000 ) Bone growth factors. The Orthopedic Clinics of North America 31: 375 – 388.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMerkx, M.A., Maltha, J.C. & Stoelinga, P.J. ( 2003 ) Assessment of the value of anorganic bone additives in sinus floor augmentation: a review of clinical reports. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 32: 1 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMisch, C.E. ( 1990 ) Divisions of available bone in implant dentistry. The International Journal of Oral Implantology 7: 9 – 17.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOlson, J.W., Dent, C.D., Morris, H.F. & Ochi, S. ( 2000 ) Long-term assessment (5 to 71 months) of endosseous dental implants placed in the augmented maxillary sinus. Annals of Periodontology 5: 152 – 156.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeleg, M., Mazor, Z. & Garg, A.K. ( 1999 ) Augmentation grafting of the maxillary sinus and simultaneous implant placement in patients with 3 to 5 mm of residual alveolar bone height. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 14: 549 – 556.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScarano, A., Degidi, M., Iezzi, G., Pecora, G., Piattelli, M., Orsini, G., Caputi, S., Perrotti, V., Mangano, C. & Piattelli, A. ( 2006 ) Maxillary sinus augmentation with different biomaterials: a comparative histologic and histomorphometric study in man. Implant Dentistry 15: 197 – 207.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchlegel, A.K. & Donath, K. ( 1998 ) BIO-OSS – a resorbable bone substitute? Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants 8: 201 – 209.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchuklenk, U. & Ashcroft, R. ( 2000 ) International research ethics. Bioethics 14: 158 – 172.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShapoff, C.A., Alexander, D.C. & Clark, A.E. ( 1997 ) Clinical use of a bioactive glass particulate in the treatment of human osseous defects. Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 18: 352 – 354 (356, 358 passim).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSummers, R.B. ( 1994 ) A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique. Compendium 15: 152 (154–156, 158 passim; quiz 162).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTatum, H. Jr ( 1986 ) Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dental Clinics of North America 30: 207 – 229.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThomas, M.V., Puleo, D.A. & Al-Sabbagh, M. ( 2005 ) Bioactive glass three decades on. Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants 15: 585 – 597.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUlm, C., Kneissel, M., Schedle, A., Solar, P., Matejka, M., Schneider, B. & Donath, K. ( 1999 ) Characteristic features of trabecular bone in edentulous maxillae. Clinical Oral Implants Research 10: 459 – 467.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceValentini, P., Abensur, D., Densari, D., Graziani, J.N. & Hammerle, C. ( 1998 ) Histological evaluation of Bio-Oss in a 2-stage sinus floor elevation and implantation procedure. A Human Case Report. Clinical Oral Implants Research 9: 59 – 64.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVogel, M., Voigt, C., Gross, U.M. & Muller-Mai, C.M. ( 2001 ) In vivo comparison of bioactive glass particles in rabbits. Biomaterials 22: 357 – 362.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVrouwenvelder, W.C., Groot, C.G. & de Groot, K. ( 1993 ) Histological and biochemical evaluation of osteoblasts cultured on bioactive glass, hydroxylapatite, titanium alloy, and stainless steel. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research 27: 465 – 475.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWallace, S.S. & Froum, S.J. ( 2003 ) Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants: a systematic review. Annals of Periodontology 8: 328 – 343.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWheeler, D.L., Eschbach, E.J., Hoellrich, R.G., Montfort, M.J. & Chamberland, D.L. ( 2000 ) Assessment of resorbable bioactive material for grafting of critical-size cancellous defects. Journal of Orthopedic Research 18: 140 – 148.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1600-0501.2008.01536.x.pdf
Size:
713.1KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.