Show simple item record

Prevalence and Outcomes of Multiple-Listing for Cadaveric Kidney and Liver Transplantation

dc.contributor.authorMerion, Robert M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGuidinger, Mary K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNewmann, John M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorEllison, Mary D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPort, Friedrich K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWolfe, Robert A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T20:42:42Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T20:42:42Z
dc.date.issued2004-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationMerion, Robert M.; Guidinger, Mary K.; Newmann, John M.; Ellison, Mary D.; Port, Friedrich K.; Wolfe, Robert A. (2004). "Prevalence and Outcomes of Multiple-Listing for Cadaveric Kidney and Liver Transplantation." American Journal of Transplantation 4(1): 94-100. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73815>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-6135en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-6143en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73815
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=14678039&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent97359 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherMunksgaard International Publishersen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rightsBlackwell Munksgaard 2003en_US
dc.subject.otherKidney Transplantationen_US
dc.subject.otherLiver Transplantationen_US
dc.subject.otherMultiple-listingen_US
dc.subject.otherOrgan Allocationen_US
dc.subject.otherOrgan Procurement Organizationsen_US
dc.subject.otherWaiting Listen_US
dc.titlePrevalence and Outcomes of Multiple-Listing for Cadaveric Kidney and Liver Transplantationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumScientific Registry of Transplant Recipients/University Renal Research and Education Association, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherOrgan Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, Virginia, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid14678039en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73815/1/j.1600-6135.2003.00282.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1046/j.1600-6135.2003.00282.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Transplantationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreference1.  United Network for Organ Sharing, University Renal Research and Education Association. 2002 OPTN/SRTR Annual Report: Transplantation Data 1992–2001. Rockville, MD: Dept of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Office of Special Programs, Division of Transplantation, 2002.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference2.  Public Law No. 98-507. National Organ Transplant Act, Title 42, United States Code, Section 273.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhite AJ, Ozminkowski RJ, Hassol A, Dennis JM, Murphy M. The effects of New York state's ban on multiple listing for cadaveric kidney transplantation. Health Services Res 1998; 33 ( 2 Part 1 ): 205 – 222.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOzminkowski RJ, Hassol A, White A, Murphy M, Dennis JM, Shield CF. Socioeconomic factors and multiple listing for cadaveric kidney transplantation among Medicare End Stage Renal Disease Program beneficiaries. Transplant Rev 1997; 11: 70 – 75.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAshby VB, Wolfe RA, Ojo AO et al. Racial differences, by state, in access to waitlisting and renal transplantation in the United States. Am J Transplant 2001; 1 ( Suppl. 1 ): A#884.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAshby VB, Port FK, Wolfe RA. Geographic differences in access to the waitlist and cadaveric renal transplantation in the U.S. J Am Soc Nephrol 1999; 10: 719A.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnkeny RA. Recasting the debate on multiple listing for transplantation through consideration of both principles and practice. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 1999; 8: 330 – 339.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller TE. Multiple listing for organ transplantation: autonomy unbounded. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 1992; 2: 43 – 59.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhite A, Ozminkowski RJ, Hassol A, Dennis JM, Murphy M. The relationship between multiple listing and cadaveric kidney transplantation and the effects of a multiple listing ban. Transplant Rev 1997; 11: 76 – 83.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference10.  Social Security Administration Death Master File. Springfield VA: Federal Computer Products Center, National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce; 2003.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference11.  SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT® User's Guide, Version 8. Cary NC: SAS Institute Inc; 1999.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL et al. Differences in access to cadaveric renal transplantation in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 36: 1025 – 1033.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGaylin DS, Held PJ, Port FK et al. The impact of comorbid and sociodemographic factors on access to renal transplantation. JAMA 1993; 269: 603 – 608.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSanfilippo FP, Vaughn WK, Peters TG et al. Factors affecting the waiting time of cadaveric kidney transplant candidates in the United States. JAMA 1992; 267: 247 – 252.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference15.  Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Policy 3. Organ Distribution. http://www.optn.org/policiesAndBylaws/policies.asp. Accessed 04/18/2003.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.