On the Relation between Form and Substance in Law
dc.contributor.author | Soper, Philip | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-06-01T20:43:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-06-01T20:43:50Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2007-03 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | SOPER, PHILIP (2007). "On the Relation between Form and Substance in Law." Ratio Juris 20(1): 56-65. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73833> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0952-1917 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1467-9337 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73833 | |
dc.description.abstract | In this paper the author deals with some theoretical aspects of Robert Summers' last book ( Summers 2006 ). In particular, he concentrates on the hazy relationship between form and substance in Summers' theory. In order to analyze some major difficulties entailed in the thesis that form and substance are different and independent things, the author discusses three specific questions: (1) the difference between form and substance; (2) the possibility of a form meant to be value-neutral; (3) how to distinguish a form-centered approach from a formalistic approach when one has to interpret a statute. This last question is dealt with through examples taken from two legal decisions. * | en_US |
dc.format.extent | 66091 bytes | |
dc.format.extent | 3109 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.format.mimetype | text/plain | |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2007 The Author. Journal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd | en_US |
dc.title | On the Relation between Form and Substance in Law | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Law and Legal Studies | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Government, Politics and Law | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | University of Michigan Law School Hutchens Hall Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA E-mail: psoper@umich.edu | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73833/1/j.1467-9337.2007.00347.x.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1467-9337.2007.00347.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Ratio Juris | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hart, Herbert L. A. 1965. Book Review of The Morality of Law. Harvard Law Review 78: 1281 – 96. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kennedy, Duncan. 1976. Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication. Harvard Law Review 89: 1685 – 778. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Summers, Robert S. 1984. Lon L. Fuller. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Summers, Robert S. 2006. Form and Function in a Legal System: A General Study. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.