View Item 

Show simple item record

The Agricultural Matrix and a Future Paradigm for Conservation
dc.contributor.authorVandermeer, John H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPerfecto, Ivetteen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T20:47:21Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T20:47:21Z
dc.date.issued2007-02en_US
dc.identifier.citationVANDERMEER, JOHN; PERFECTO, IVETTE (2007). "The Agricultural Matrix and a Future Paradigm for Conservation." Conservation Biology 21(1): 274-277. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73889>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0888-8892en_US
dc.identifier.issn1523-1739en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73889
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=17298536&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent113349 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.rights2007 Society for Conservation Biologyen_US
dc.titleThe Agricultural Matrix and a Future Paradigm for Conservationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationum* Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationum† School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.en_US
dc.identifier.pmid17298536en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73889/1/j.1523-1739.2006.00582.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00582.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceConservation Biologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAide, T. M., and H. R. Grau. 2004. Globalization, migration and Latin American ecosystems. Science 305: 1915 – 1916.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlexandratos, N. 1999. World food and agriculture: outlook for the medium and longer term. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 96: 5908 – 5914.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllen, J. C., and D. F. Barnes. 1985. The causes of deforestation in developing countries. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 75: 163 – 184.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAngelsen, A., and D. Kaimowitz, editors. 2001. Agricultural technologies and tropical deforestation. CABI Publishing, Oxon, United Kingdom.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAusebel, J. H. 1996. Can technology spare the Earth? American Scientist 84: 166 – 178.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAshton, M. S., and F. Montagnini, editors. 1999. The silvicultural basis for agroforestry systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBadgley, C., J. Moghtader, E. Quintero, E. Zakem, M. J. Chappell, K. AvilÉs-VÁzquez, A. Samulon, and I. Perfecto. 2006. Organic agriculture and the global food supply. Renewable Resources and Food Systems: in press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBolger, D. T., A. C. Alberts, and M. E. SoulÉ. 1991. Occurrence patterns of birds species in habitat fragments: sampling, extinction, and nested species subsets. The American Naturalist 137: 155 – 166.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBunch, R. 1999. More productivity with fewer external inputs: Central American case studies of agroecological development and their broader implications. Environment Development and Sustainability 1: 219 – 233.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurkey, T. V. 1989. Extinction in nature reserves: the effect of fragmentation and the importance of migration between reserve fragments. Oikos 55: 75 – 81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClark, S., K. Klonsky, P. Livingston, and S. Temple. 1999. Crop yield and economic comparisons of organic, low-input, and conventional farming systems in California's Sacramento Valley. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 14: 109 – 121.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCochrane, W. W. 2003. The curse of American agricultural abundance: a sustainable solution. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCullen, L. Jr., K. Alger, and D. M. Rambaldi. 2005. Land reform and biodiversity conservation in Brazil in the 1990: conflict and the articulation of mutual interests. Conservation Biology 19: 747 – 755.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDaily, G. 2001. Ecological forecasts. Nature 411: 245.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavis, M. 2001. Late Victorian holocausts: El NiÑo famines and the making of the Third World. Verso, London.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDinham, B. 1993. The pesticide hazard. Zed Books, London.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDyson, T. 1999. World food trends and prospects to 2025. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA 96: 5929 – 5936.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFerraz, G., G. L. Russell, P. C. Stouffer, R. O. Bleregaard Jr., S. L. Pimm, and T. E. Lovejoy. 2003. Rates of species loss from Amazonian forest fragments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA 100: 14069 – 14073.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFischer, M., and J. StÖcklin. 1985. Local extinctions of plants in remnants of extensively used calcareous grasslands 1950–1985. Conservation Biology 11: 727 – 737.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFischer, J., D. B. Lindenmayer, and A. D. Manning. 2006. Biodiversity, ecosystem function, and resilience: ten guiding principles for commodity production landscapes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4: 80 – 86.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoklany, I. M. 1998. Saving habitat and conserving biodiversity on a crowded planet. BioScience 48: 941 – 953.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrau, H. R., T. M. Aide, J. K. Zimmerman, J. R. Thomlison, E. Helmer, and X. Zou. 2003. The ecological consequences of socioeconomic and land-use changes in postagriculture Puerto Rico. BioScience 53: 1159 – 1168.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreen, R. E., S. J. Cornell, J. P. W. Scharlemann, and A. Balmford. 2005. Farming and the fate of wild nature. Science 307: 550 – 555.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHanski, I. 1999. Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHirsch, A. 2003. AvaliaÇÃo da fragmentaÇÃo do habitat e seleÇÃo de areas prioritÁrias para a conservaÇÃo dos primates na Bacia do Rio Doce, Minas Gerais, atravÉs da aplicaÇÃo de um sistema de informaÇÕes geogrÁficas. PhD thesis. Instituto de CiÉncias BiolÓgicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJackson, D. L., and L. L. Jackson. 2002. The farm as natural habitat: reconnecting food systems with ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, D.C.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson, G. L., and Q. L. Quance. 1972. The overproduction trap in US agriculture. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevins, R. 1990. The struggle for ecological agriculture in Cuba. Capitalism, Nature and Socialism 5: 121 – 141.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMatson, P. A., W. J. Parton, A. G. Power, and M. J. Swift. 1997. Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 277: 504 – 509.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcNeely, J. A., and S. J. Scherr. 2002. Ecoagriculture: strategies to feed the world and to save wild biodiversity. Island Press, Washington, D.C.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoguel, P., and V. M. Toledo. 1999. Biodiversity conservation in traditional coffee systems of Mexico. Conservation Biology 13: 11 – 21.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoore LappÉ, F., J. Collins, and P. Rosset. 1998. World hunger twelve myths. Food First Books, Oakland, California.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMyers, N. 1993. Tropical forests: the main deforestation fronts. Environmental Conservation 20: 9 – 16.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewmark, W. D. 1995. Extinction of mammal populations in western North American national parks. Conservation Biology 9: 512 – 526.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOpdan, P. 1991. Metapopulation theory in habitat fragmentation: a review of holartic breeding bird studies. Landscape Ecology 5: 93 – 106.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePerera Puga, A., and P. Rosalba GonzÁlez. 1986. Sistema nacional de Áreas protegidas de la RepÚblica de Cuba. Taller Internacional sobre Sistemas Nacionales de Areas ProtegÍdas, Caracas, Venezuela. COMARNA, La Habana, Cuba.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePerfecto, I., and I. Armbrecht. 2003. The coffee agroecosystem in the Neotropics: combining ecological and economic goals. Pages 159 – 194 in J. H. Vandermeer, editor. Tropical agroecosystems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePerfecto, I., and J. Vandermeer. 2002. The quality of agroecological matrix in a tropical montane landscape: ants in coffee plantations in southern Mexico. Conservation Biology 16: 174 – 182.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePerfecto, I., R. Rice, R. Greenberg, and M. Van der Voolt. 1996. Shade coffee as refuge of biodiversity. BioScience 46: 589 – 608.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePimentel, D., U. Stachow, D. A. Takacs, and H. W. Brubaker. 1992. Conserving biological diversity in agricultural/forestry systems. BioScience 42: 354 – 362.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePolanyi, K. 1944. The great transformation. Beacon Press, Boston.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRanjan, R., and V. P. Upadhyay. 1999. Ecological problems due to shifting cultivation. Current Science 77: 1246 – 1250.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaatchi, S., D. Agosti, K. Alger, J. Delabie, and J. Musinsky. 2001. Examining fragmentation and loss of primary forest in the Southern Bahian Atlantic forest of Brazil with radar imagery. Conservation Biology 15: 867 – 875.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSantana, E. 1991. Nature conservation and sustainable development in Cuba. Conservation Biology 5: 13 – 16.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSoule, J. D., and J. K. Piper. 1992. Farming in nature's image. Island Press, Washington, D.C.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStratford, J. A., and P. C. Stouffer. 1999. Local extinctions of terrestrial insectivorous birds in a fragmented landscape near Manaus, Brazil. Conservation Biology 13: 1416 – 1423.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTscharntke, T., I. Steffan-Dewenter, A. Kruess, and C. Thies. 2002. Contribution of small habitat fragments to conservation of insect communities of grassland-cropland landscapes. Ecological Applications 12: 354 – 363.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrewavas, A. J. 2001. The population/biodiversity paradox. Agricultural efficiency to save wilderness. Plant Physiology 125: 174 – 179.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVandermeer, J. H., and R. Carvajal. 2001. Metapopulation dynamics and the quality of the matrix. The American Naturalist 158: 211 – 220.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVandermeer, J. H., and I. Perfecto. 2005. The future of farming and conservation. Science 308: 1257 – 1258.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVandermeer, J. H., I. Perfecto, S. Philpott, and M. J. Chappell. 2006. Reenfocando la conservaciÓn en el paisaje: La importancia de la matriz. In press in J. Saenz, and C. Harvey, editors, EvaluaciÓn y conservaciÓn de la biodiversidad en paisajes fragmentados en Mesoamerica. Editorial de la Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Costa Rica, San Jose, Costa Rica.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilson, E. O. 1987. The little things that run the world (the importance and conservation of invertebrates). Conservation Biology 1: 344 – 346.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1523-1739.2006.00582.x.pdf
Size:
110.6KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.