Show simple item record

BRIEF REPORT: Brief Instrument to Assess Geriatrics Knowledge of Surgical and Medical Subspecialty House Officers

dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Brent C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFitzgerald, James T.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T20:48:11Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T20:48:11Z
dc.date.issued2006-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationWilliams, Brent C . ; Fitzgerald, James T . (2006). "BRIEF REPORT: Brief Instrument to Assess Geriatrics Knowledge of Surgical and Medical Subspecialty House Officers." Journal of General Internal Medicine 21(5): 490-493. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73902>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0884-8734en_US
dc.identifier.issn1525-1497en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73902
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=16704394&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractInitiatives are underway to increase geriatrics training in nonprimary care disciplines. However, no validated instrument exists to measure geriatrics knowledge of house officers in surgical specialties and medical subspecialties. METHODS : A 23-item multiple-choice test emphasizing inpatient care and common geriatric syndromes was developed through expert panels and pilot testing, and administered to 305 residents and fellows at 4 institutions in surgical disciplines (25% of respondents), emergency medicine (29%), medicine subspecialties (19%), internal medicine (12%), and other disciplines (15%). RESULTS : Three items decreased internal reliability. The remaining 20 items covered 17 topic areas. Residents averaged 62% correct on the test. Internal consistency was appropriate (Cronbach's Α coefficient=0.60). Validity was supported by the use of expert panels to develop content, and by overall differences in scores by level of training ( P <.0001) and graded improvement in test performance, with 58%, 63%, 62%, and 69% correct responses among HO1, HO2, HO3, and HO4s, respectively. CONCLUSIONS : This reliable, valid measure of clinical geriatrics knowledge can be used by a wide variety of surgical and medical graduate medical education programs to guide curriculum reform or evaluate program performance to meet certification requirements. The instrument is now available on the web.en_US
dc.format.extent116726 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.rights© 2006 by the Society of General Internal Medicine. All rights reserveden_US
dc.subject.otherMeasurementen_US
dc.subject.otherInternship and Residencyen_US
dc.subject.otherEducationen_US
dc.subject.otherSurgeryen_US
dc.subject.otherSpecialistsen_US
dc.titleBRIEF REPORT: Brief Instrument to Assess Geriatrics Knowledge of Surgical and Medical Subspecialty House Officersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA ;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Medical Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA ;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Veterans Affairs, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid16704394en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73902/1/j.1525-1497.2006.00433.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00433.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of General Internal Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.citedreference1.  Alliance for Aging Research. Medical never-never land: 10 reasons why America is not ready for the coming age boom. February, 2002. Available at: http://www.agingresearch.org/bookshelf.cfm. Accessed March 10, 2003.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSolomon DH, Burton JR, Lundebjerg NE, Eisner J. The new frontier: increasing geriatrics expertise in surgical and medical specialties. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000; 48: 702 – 4.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHazzard WR. Integrating geriatrics into the subspecialties of internal medicine: Project overview. September 2000. Available at: http://www.americangeriatrics.org/ags_hart_main.shtml. Accessed March 13, 2003.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference4.  A statement of principles: toward improved care of older patients in surgical and medical specialties. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000; 48: 699 – 701.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference5.  Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Basic Geriatric Care Objectives for Residency Training in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 1999.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSanders AB (ed). Emergency Care of the Elder Person. Geriatric Medicine Task Force. Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. St. Louis, MO: Beverly Cracom Publications; 1996.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference7.  American Geriatrics Web site. Available at: http://www.americangeriatrics.org/ags_hart_main.shtml. Accessed March 13, 2003.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference8.  D.W. Reynolds Foundation Website. Available at: http://www.dwreynolds.org/Financials/Grants.htm. Accessed March 13, 2003.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaxwell AJ, Sullivan N. Attitudes toward the geriatric patient among family practice residents. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1980; 28: 341 – 5.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReuben DB, Fullerton JT, Tschann JM, Croughan-Minihane M. Attitudes of beginning medical students toward older persons: a five-campus study. The University of California Academic Geriatric Resource Program Student Survey Research Group. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995; 43: 1430 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIntrieri RC, von Eye A, Kelly JA. The aging semantic differential: a confirmatory factor analysis. Gerontologist. 1995; 35: 616 – 21.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePalmore E. Facts on aging: a short quiz. Gerontologist. 1977; 17: 315 – 20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReuben DB, Lee M, Davis JW, Eslami MS, Osterweil DG, Melchiore S, Weintraub NT. Development and validation of a geriatrics knowledge test for primary care residents. J Gen Intern Med. 1997; 12: 450 – 2.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCobbs EL, Duthie EH, Murphy JB, eds. Geriatrics Review Syllabus: A Core Curriculum in Geriatric Medicine. 5th edn. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing for the American Geriatrics Society; 2002.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCobbs EL, Duthie EH, Murphy JB, eds. Geriatrics Review Syllabus: A Core Curriculum in Geriatric Medicine. 4th edn. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company for the American Geriatrics Society; 1999.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKatz PR, Grossberg GT, Potter JF, et al. Geriatrics Syllabus for Specialists. New York, NY: American Geriatrics Society; 2002.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCase SM, Swanson DB. Constructing Written Test Questions for the Basic and Clinical Sciences. 2nd edn. Philadelphia, PA: National Board of Medical Examiners (3rd edition available at: http://www.nbme.org/PDF/2001iwgindex.pdf, 1998 ).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951; 16: 297 – 334.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.