Show simple item record

The ontogenetic complexity of developmental constraints

dc.contributor.authorBookstein, Fred L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLundrigan, Barbara L.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T20:53:01Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T20:53:01Z
dc.date.issued1993-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationBookstein, Fred L.; Lundrigan, Barbara L. (1993). "The ontogenetic complexity of developmental constraints." Journal of Evolutionary Biology 6(5): 621-641. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73980>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1010-061Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1420-9101en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/73980
dc.description.abstractDevelopmental constraint is a theoretically important construct bridging ontogenetic and evolutionary studies. We propose a new operationalization of this notion that exploits the unusually rich measurement structure of landmark data. We represent landmark configurations by their partial warps, a basis for morphospace that represents a set of localized features of form. A finding of developmental constraint arises from the interplay between age-varying means and age-specific variances in these subspaces of morphospace. Examination of variances and means in 16 ventral skull landmarks in the cotton rat S. fulviventer at ages 1, 10, 20, and 30 days yielded three types of developmental constraint: canalization (constraint to relatively constant form age by age); chreods (reduction of variance orthogonal to the mean trajectory over ages); and opposition (reduction of age-specific variance along the mean trajectory over ages). While canalization and chreodic constraints have been noted previously, the oppositional type of constraint appears novel. Only one of our characters, relative length and orientation of the incisive foramen, appears to be canalized. Although skull growth becomes increasingly integrated through ontogeny, our characters display a remarkable spatiotemporal complexity in patterns of variance reduction. The specific assortment of constraints observed may be related to the precociality of Sigmodon . We suggest that Waddington's diagrammatic presentation of the “epigenetic landscape” may be misleading in quantitative studies of developmental regulation.en_US
dc.format.extent1494974 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Science Ltden_US
dc.rightsBlackwell Science Incen_US
dc.subject.otherConstraintsen_US
dc.subject.otherDevelopmenten_US
dc.subject.otherMorphometricsen_US
dc.subject.otherSkullsen_US
dc.subject.otherRodentsen_US
dc.titleThe ontogenetic complexity of developmental constraintsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumMuseum of Zoology, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/73980/1/j.1420-9101.1993.6050621.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1046/j.1420-9101.1993.6050621.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.