View Item 

Show simple item record

Effects of Polarity for Monophasic and Biphasic Shocks on Defibrillation Efficacy with an Endocardial System
dc.contributor.authorUsui, Masahiroen_US
dc.contributor.authorWalcott, Gregory P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorStrickberger, S. Adamen_US
dc.contributor.authorRollins, Dennis L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSmith, William M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorIdeker, Raymond E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T20:54:20Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T20:54:20Z
dc.date.issued1996-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationUSUI, MASAHIRO; WALCOTT, GREGORY P.; STRICKBERGER, S. ADAM; ROLLINS, DENNIS L.; SMITH, WILLIAM M.; IDEKER, RAYMOND E. (1996). "Effects of Polarity for Monophasic and Biphasic Shocks on Defibrillation Efficacy with an Endocardial System." Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 19(1): 65-71. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74001>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0147-8389en_US
dc.identifier.issn1540-8159en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74001
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=8848379&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent3467182 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights1996 Official journal of the International Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology Societyen_US
dc.subject.otherTransvenous Defibrillationen_US
dc.subject.otherPolarity Reversalen_US
dc.subject.otherMonophasic Waveformen_US
dc.subject.otherBiphasic Waveformen_US
dc.titleEffects of Polarity for Monophasic and Biphasic Shocks on Defibrillation Efficacy with an Endocardial Systemen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPhysiologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationum* Department of Cardiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartments of Medicine and Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, and the Engineering Research Center for Emerging Cardiovascular Technologies of the School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolinaen_US
dc.identifier.pmid8848379en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/74001/1/j.1540-8159.1996.tb04792.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb04792.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourcePacing and Clinical Electrophysiologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTroup PJ, Chapman PD, Olinger GN, et al. The implanted defibrillator: Relation to defibrillating lead configuration and clinical variables to defibrillation threshold, J Am Coll Cardiol 1985: 6: 1315 – 1321.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIdeker RE, Wolf PD, Alferness CA, et al. Current concepts for selecting the location, size, and shape of defibrillation electrodes, PACE 1991: 14: 227 – 240.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWinkle RA, Mead RH. Ruder MA, et al. Improved low energy defibrillation efficacy in man with the use of a biphasic truncated exponential waveform. Am Heart J 1989; 117: 122 – 127.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBardy GH, Ivey TD, Allen MD, et al. A prospective randomized evaluation of biphasic versus mono-phasic waveform pulses on defibrillation efficacy in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 14: 728 – 733.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBardy GH, Ivey TD, Johnson G, et al. Prospective evaluation of initially ineffective defibrillation pulses on subsequent defibrillation success during ventricular fibrillation in survivors of cardiac arrest. Am J Cardiol 1988; 62: 718 – 722.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchuder JC, Stoeckle H, McDaniel WC, et al. Is the effectiveness of cardiac ventricular defibrillation dependent upon polarity ? Med Instrum 1987; 21: 262 – 265.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBardy GH, Ivey TD, Allen MD, et al. Evaluation of electrode polarity on defibrillation efficacy. Am J Cardiol 1989; 63: 433 – 437.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO'Neill PG, Boahene KA, Lawrie GM, et al. The automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; Effect of patch polarity on defibrillation threshold. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 17: 707 – 711.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTroup P, Wethfirbee JN, Chapman PD, et al. Does electrode polarity affect defibrillation efficacy ? ( abstract ) PACE 1990; 13: 528.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeaver WD, Martin JS, Wirkus MJ, et al. Influence of external dcfibrillator electrode polarity on cardiac resuscitation. PACE 1993; 16: 285 – 291.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThakur RK, Souza JJ, Chapman PD, et al. Electrode polarity is an important determinant of defibrillation efficacy using a nonthoracotomy system. PACE 1994; 17: 919 – 923.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStrickberger SA, Hummel JD, Horwood LE, et al. Effect of shock polarity on ventricular defibrillation threshold using a transvenous lead system. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 24: 1069 – 1072.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcDaniel WC, Schuder JC. An up-down algorithm for estimation of the cardiac ventricular defibrillation threshold. Med Instrum 1987; 21: 170 – 176.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavy JM, Fain ES, Dorian P, et al. The relationship between successful defibrillation and delivered energy in open-chest dogs: Reappraisal of the “defibrillation threshold” concept. Am Heart J 1987; 113: 77 – 84.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJones DL, Irish WD, Klein GJ, et al. Defibrillation efficacy: Comparison of defibrillation threshold versus dose-response curve determination. Circ Res 1991; 69: 45 – 51.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference16. SAS/STAT® User's Guide, Release 6.03 Edition. Gary, NC, SAS Institute, Inc., 1988.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWharton JM, Wolf PD, Smith WM, et al. Cardiac potential and potential gradient fields generated by a single, combined, and sequential shocks during ventricular defibrillation. Circulation 1992; 85: 1510 – 1523.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSepulveda NG, Roth BJ, Wikswo JP Jr. Current injection into a two-dimensional anisotropic bidomain. Biophys J 1989; 55: 987 – 999.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrayanova NA, Roth BJ, Maiden LJ. The response of a spherical heart to a uniform electric field: A bidomain analysis of cardiac stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1993; 40: 899 – 908.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKnisley SB, Hill BC, Ideker RE. Virtual electrode effects in myocardial fibers. Biophys J 1994; 66; 719 – 728.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNeunlist M, Tung L. Optical recordings of ventricular excitability of frog heart by an extracellular stimulating point electrode. PACE 1994; 17: 1641 – 1654.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWolf PD, Walcott GP, Smith WM, et al. Epicardial mapping demonstrates a predictable arrhythmia following unsuccessful transvenous defibrillation near threshold. ( abstract ) J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23: 421A.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTang ASL, Wolf PD, Afework Y, et al. Three-dimensional potential gradient fields generated by intracardiac catheter and cutaneous patch electrodes. Circulation 1992; 85: 1857 – 1864.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDixon EG, Tang ASL, Wolf PD, et al. Improved defibrillation thresholds with large contoured epicardial electrodes and biphasic waveforms. Circulation 1987; 76: 1176 – 1184.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTang ASL, Yabe S, Wharton JM, et al. Ventricular defibrillation using biphasic waveforms: The importance of phasic duration, J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 13: 207 – 214.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeeser SA, Tang ASL, Kavanagh KM, et al. Strength-duration and probability of success curves for defibrillation with biphasic waveforms. Circulation 1990; 82: 2128 – 2141.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1540-8159.1996.tb04792.x.pdf
Size:
3.306MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.