Show simple item record

Effects of Small Rodent and Large Mammal Exclusion on Seedling Recruitment in Costa Rica 1

dc.contributor.authorDeMattia, Elizabeth A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRathcke, Beverly J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCurran, Lisa M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAguilar, Reinaldoen_US
dc.contributor.authorVargas, Orlandoen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T20:56:33Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T20:56:33Z
dc.date.issued2006-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationDeMattia, Elizabeth A.; Rathcke, Beverly J.; Curran, Lisa M.; Aguilar, Reinaldo; Vargas, Orlando (2006). "Effects of Small Rodent and Large Mammal Exclusion on Seedling Recruitment in Costa Rica 1 ." Biotropica 38(2): 196-202. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74037>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0006-3606en_US
dc.identifier.issn1744-7429en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74037
dc.description.abstractWe examined whether the experimental exclusion of large mammalian and small rodent seed predators had differing effects on seedling recruitment under natural seed rain conditions. In both primary and late-successional secondary forested areas, exclosure experiments using natural seed densities were designed to assess seedling recruitment. To assess the differences in seedling recruitment, we monitored three exclosure treatments (1.2 m radius/1.5 m height) in two forest types (primary vs. late-successional secondary forest): (1) fenced exclosures that excluded large mammals; (2) fenced exclosures that excluded both large and small mammals; and (3) open controls. Within each exclosure treatment, we marked and identified all seedlings at the beginning of the experiment (February 2001), followed the marked seedlings' fate for a year, and then marked and identified all new seedlings after a year. Two preliminary findings were generated from these data: for some tree species, small rodents and large mammals have differential effects on seedling recruitment, and the effect of excluding mammals did not differ with habitat type (primary vs. late-successional secondary forest). These preliminary results highlight the need to examine further how the effects of small rodent and large mammal exclusion may affect species-specific seed predation and seedling recruitment in a variety of habitat/land use types ( e.g. , primary forest, late-successional forest, and early-successional forest).en_US
dc.format.extent202192 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.rights2005 The Author(s) Journal compilation © 2005 by The Association for Tropical Biology and Conservationen_US
dc.subject.otherCorcovado National Parken_US
dc.subject.otherExclosuresen_US
dc.subject.otherMicrosite Variationen_US
dc.subject.otherPerebea Hispidulaen_US
dc.subject.otherPouteria Sp.en_US
dc.subject.otherTropical Foresten_US
dc.subject.otherTrophis Racemosaen_US
dc.titleEffects of Small Rodent and Large Mammal Exclusion on Seedling Recruitment in Costa Rica 1en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherOrganization for Tropical Studies, La Selva Biological Station, Apartado 676-2050, San Pedro, Costa Ricaen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/74037/1/j.1744-7429.2006.00117.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1744-7429.2006.00117.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceBiotropicaen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdler, G. H., and D. W. Kestell. 1998. Fates of Neotropical tree seeds influenced by spiny rats ( Proechimys semispinosus ). Biotropica 30: 677 – 681.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdler, G. H., and J. O. Seamon. 1991. Distribution and abundance of a tropical rodent, the spiny rat, on islands in Panama. J. Trop. Ecol. 7: 349 – 360.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAltrichter, M., E. Carrillo, J. Saenz, and T. K. Fuller. 2001. White-lipped peccary ( Tayassu pecari, Artiodactyla: Tayassuidae) diet and fruit availability in a Costa Rican rain forest. Rev. Biol. Trop. 49: 1183 – 1192.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAsquith, N., S. Wright, and M. Clauss. 1997. Does mammal community composition control recruitment in Neotropical forests? Evidence from Panama. Ecology 78: 941 – 946.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAsquith, N. M., J. Terborgh, A. E. Arnold, and C. M. Riveros. 1999. The fruits the agouti ate: Hymenaea courbaril seed fate when its disperser is absent. J. Trop. Ecol. 15: 229 – 235.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrewer, S. W., and M. A. H. Webb. 2001. Ignorant seed predators and factors affecting the seed survival of a tropical palm. Oikos 93: 32 – 41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarrillo, E., G. Wong, and A. CuarÓn. 2000. Monitoring mammal populations in Costa Rican protected areas under different hunting restrictions. Conserv. Biol. 14: 1580 – 1591.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrawley, M. J. 2000. Seed predators and plant population dynamics. In M. Feener ( Ed. ). Seeds: The ecology of regeneration in plant communities, pp. 157 – 192. CABI International, Wallingford.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeMattia, E. A. 2004. Effects of small rodents and large mammals on seed predation and seedling regeneration within primary and secondary Costa Rican forests. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeMattia, E. A., L. M. Curran, and B. J. Rathcke. 2004. Effects of small rodents and large mammals on tropical seeds. Ecology 85: 2161 – 2170.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeSteven, D., and F. Putz. 1984. Impact of mammals on early recruitment of a tropical canopy tree, Dipteryx panamensis, in Panama. Oikos 43: 207 – 216.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFleming, T. H. 1970. Notes on the rodent faunas of two Panamanian forests. J. Mammal. 51: 473 – 490.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFleming, T. H. 1973. The number of rodent species in two Costa Rican forests. J. Mammal. 54: 518 – 521.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceForget, P. 1993. Post-dispersal predation and scatterhoarding of Dipteryx panamensis seeds by rodents in Panama. Oecologia 94: 255 – 261.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceForget, P. 1994. Recruitment pattern of Voucapoua americana (Caesalpiniaceae), a rodent-dispersed tree species in French Guiana. Biotropica 26: 408 – 419.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceForget, P. M., K. Kitajima, and R. B. Foster. 1999. Pre- and post-dispersal seed predation in Tachigali versicolor (Caesalpiniaceae): Effects of timing and fruiting variation among trees. J. Trop. Ecol. 15: 61 – 81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuariguata, M. R., H. Arias-LeClaire, and G. Jones. 2002. Tree seed fate in a logged and fragmented forest landscape, Northeastern Costa Rica. Biotropica 34: 405 – 415.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHammond, D. S. 1995. Post-dispersal seed and seedling mortality of tropical dry forest trees after shifting agriculture, Chiapas, Mexico. J. Trop. Ecol. 11: 295 – 313.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarms, K. E., S. J. Wright, O. CalderÓn, A. HernÁndez, and E. A. Herre. 2000. Pervasive density-dependent recruitment enhances seedling diversity in a tropical forest. Nature 404: 493 – 495.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHartshorn, G. S. 1983. Wildlands conservation in Central America. In S. L. Sutton, T. C. Whitmore, and A. C. Chadwick ( Eds. ). Tropical rain forests: Ecology and management, pp. 423 – 444. Blackwell Scientific Publishers, Oxford.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHubbell, S. P., R. B. Foster, S. T. O'Brien, K. E. Harms, R. Condit, B. Wechsler, S. J. Wright, and S. L. de Lao. 1999. Light-cap disturbances, recruitment limitation, and tree diversity in a Neotropical forest. Science 283: 554 – 557.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJanzen, D. 1971. Seed predation by animals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2: 465 – 492.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJerozolimski, A., and C. A. Peres. 2003. Bringing home the biggest bacon: A cross-site analysis of the structure of hunter-kill profiles in Neotropical forests. Biol. Conserv. 11: 415 – 425.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLambert, T., and G. Adler. 2000. Microhabitat use by a tropical forest rodent, Proechimys semispinosus, in Central America. J. Mammal. 81: 70 – 76.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNaughton-Treves, L., J. L. Mena, A. Treves, N. Alvarez, and V. C. Radeloff. 2003. Wildlife survival beyond park boundaries: The impact of slash-burn agriculture and hunting on mammals in Tambopata, Peru. Conserv. Biol. 17: 1106 – 1117.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNotman, E., D. L. Gorchov, and F. Cornejo. 1996. Effect of distance, aggregation, and habitat on levels of seed predation for two mammals—dispersed Neotropical rain forest tree species. Oecologia 106: 221 – 227.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeres, C. A. 2001. Synergistic effects of subsistence hunting and habitat fragmentation on Amazonian forest vertebrates. Conserv. Biol. 15: 1490 – 1505.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePhillips, P. L. 1989. The relationship of successional and primary tropical forest to color infrared photography. Master's Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, Austin.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReid, F. 1997. A field guide to the mammals of Central America and Southeast Mexico, 343 p. Oxford University Press, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRichards, P. W. 1952. The tropical rain forest, 575 p. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoldÁn, A. I., and J. A. Simonetti. 2001. Plant-mammal interactions in tropical Bolivian forests with different hunting pressures. Conserv. Biol. 15: 617 – 623.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSilman, M. R., J. W. Terborgh, and R. A. Kiltie. 2003. Population regulation of a dominant rain forest tree by a major seed predator. Ecology 84: 431 – 438.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSork, V. 1987. Effects of predation and light on seedling establishment of Gustavia superba. Ecology 65: 1341 – 1350.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTerborgh, J. 1999. Requiem for nature, 234 p. Island Press, Washington, DC.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVoss, R. S., and L. H. Emmons. 1996. Mammalian diversity in Neotropical lowland forest: A preliminary assessment. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 230: 1 – 115.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWright, S. J., and H. C. Duber. 2001. Poachers and forest fragmentation alter seed dispersal, seed survival, and seedling recruitment in the palm Attalea butyraceae with implications for tropical tree diversity. Biotropica 33: 583 – 595.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWright, S. J., H. Zeballos, I. Dominguez, M. M. Gallardo, M. C. Moreno, and R. Banez. 2000. Poachers alter mammal abundance, seed dispersal, and seed predation in a Neotropical forest. Conserv. Biol. 14: 227 – 239.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.