View Item 

Show simple item record

Clonidine for the prevention of emergence agitation in young children: efficacy and recovery profile
dc.contributor.authorBurke, Constanceen_US
dc.contributor.authorTait, Alan R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMalviya, Shobhaen_US
dc.contributor.authorVoepel-Lewis, Terrien_US
dc.contributor.authorRamamurthi, Radhamangalam J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T20:57:36Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T20:57:36Z
dc.date.issued2006-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationMALVIYA, SHOBHA; VOEPEL-LEWIS, TERRI; RAMAMURTHI, RADHAMANGALAM J.; BURKE, CONSTANCE; TAIT, ALAN R. (2006). "Clonidine for the prevention of emergence agitation in young children: efficacy and recovery profile." Pediatric Anesthesia 16(5): 554-559. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74054>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1155-5645en_US
dc.identifier.issn1460-9592en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74054
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=16677266&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent89611 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.subject.otherEmergence Agitationen_US
dc.subject.otherYoung Childrenen_US
dc.subject.otherClonidineen_US
dc.titleClonidine for the prevention of emergence agitation in young children: efficacy and recovery profileen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPediatricsen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSurgery and Anesthesiologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationum* Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationother† Department of Anesthesiology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid16677266en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/74054/1/j.1460-9592.2006.01818.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1460-9592.2006.01818.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourcePediatric Anesthesiaen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVeyckemans F. Excitation phenomena during sevoflurane anaesthesia in children. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology 2001; 14: 339 – 343.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVoepel-Lewis T, Burke C, Hadden SM et al. Nurses’ diagnoses and treatment decisions regarding care of the agitated child. J Perianesth Nurs 2005; 20: 239 – 248.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVoepel-Lewis T, Malviya S, Tait AR. A prospective cohort study of emergence agitation in the pediatric postanesthesia care unit. Anesth Analg 2003; 96: 1625 – 1630.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOlympio MA. Postanesthetic delirium: historical perspectives. J Clin Anesth 1991; 3: 60 – 63.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAono J, Ueda W, Mamiya K et al. Greater incidence of delirium during recovery from sevoflurane anesthesia in preschool boys. Anesthesiology 1997; 87: 1298 – 1300.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWells LT, Rasch DK. Emergence ‘delirium’ after sevoflurane anesthesia: a paranoid delusion? (see comments). Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 1308 – 1310.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFinkel JC, Cohen I, Hannallah RS et al. The effect of intranasal fentanyl on the emergence characteristics after sevoflurane anesthesia in children undergoing surgery for bilateral myringotomy tube placement. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 1164 – 1168.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWelborn LG, Hannallah RS, Norden JM et al. Comparison of emergence and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane, desflurane, and halothane in pediatric ambulatory patients. Anesth Analg 1996; 83: 917 – 920.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCole JW, Murray DJ, McAllister JD et al. Emergence behaviour in children: defining the incidence of excitement and agitation following anaesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth 2002; 12: 442 – 447.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavis PJ, Greenberg JA, Gendelman M et al. Recovery characteristics of sevoflurane and halothane in preschool-aged children undergoing bilateral myringotomy and pressure equalization tube insertion. Anesth Analg 1999; 88: 34 – 38.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFan K-T, Lee T-H, Tsung-Hsing K-L et al. Influences of tramadol on emergence characteristics from sevoflurane anesthesia in pediatric ambulatory surgery. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2000; 16: 255 – 260.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalinkin JL, Fazi LM, Cuy RM et al. Use of intranasal fentanyl in children undergoing myringotomy and tube placement during halothane and sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2000; 93: 1378 – 1383.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLapin SL, Auden SM, Goldsmith LJ et al. Effects of sevoflurane anaesthesia on recovery in children: a comparison with halothane. Paediatr Anaesth 1999; 9: 299 – 304.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBock M, Kunz P, Schreckenberger R et al. Comparison of caudal and intravenous clonidine in the prevention of agitation after sevoflurane in children. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 790 – 796.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFazi L, Jantzen EC, Rose JB et al. A comparison of oral clonidine and oral midazolam as preanesthetic medications in the pediatric tonsillectomy patient. Anesth Analg 2001; 92: 56 – 61.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMerkel SI, Voepel-Lewis T, Shayevitz JR et al. The FLACC: a behavioral scale for scoring postoperative pain in young children. Pediatr Nurs 1997; 23: 293 – 297.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCravero J, Surgenor S, Whalen K. Emergence agitation in paediatric patients after sevoflurane anaesthesia and no surgery: a comparison with halothane. Paediatr Anaesth 2000; 10: 419 – 424.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCravero JP, Beach M, Dodge CP et al. Emergence characteristics of sevoflurane compared to halothane in pediatric patients undergoing bilateral pressure equalization tube insertion. J Clin Anesth 2000; 12: 397 – 401.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavis PJ, Cohen IT, McGowan Jr FX et al. Recovery characteristics of desflurane vs halothane for maintenance of anesthesia in pediatric ambulatory patients. Anesthesiology 1994; 80: 298 – 302.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCravero JP, Beach M, Thyr B et al. The effect of small dose fentanyl on the emergence characteristics of pediatric patients after sevoflurane anesthesia without surgery. Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 364 – 367.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan der Bijl P, Roelofse JA. Disinhibitory reactions to benzodiazepines: a review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991; 49: 519 – 523.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStoelting R. Barbiturates. In: Stoelting R, ed. Pharmacology and Physiology in Anesthetic Practice, 2nd edn. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Co., 1991: 108.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTobias JD, Berkenbosch JW, Russo P. Additional experience with dexmedetomidine in pediatric patients. South Med J 2003; 96: 871 – 875.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevanen J, Makela ML, Scheinin H. Dexmedetomidine premedication attenuates ketamine-induced cardiostimulatory effects and postanesthetic delirium. Anesthesiology 1995; 82: 1117 – 1125.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIbacache ME, Munoz HR, Brandes V et al. Single-dose dexmedetomidine reduces agitation after sevoflurane anesthesia in children. Anesth Analg 2004; 98: 60 – 63.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuler G, Akin A, Tosun Z et al. Single-dose dexmedetomidine reduces agitation and provides smooth extubation after pediatric adenotonsillectomy. Pediatr Anesth 2005; 15: 762 – 766.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKulka PJ, Bressem M, Tryba M. Clonidine prevents sevoflurane-induced agitation in children. Anesth Analg 2001; 93: 335 – 338.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBergendahl HT, Lonnqvist PA, Eksborg S et al. Clonidine vs midazolam as premedication in children undergoing adeno-tonsillectomy: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004; 48: 1292 – 1300.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1460-9592.2006.01818.x.pdf
Size:
87.51KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.