Show simple item record

Community-level consequences of species interactions in an annual plant community

dc.contributor.authorRajaniemi, Tara K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTurkington, Royen_US
dc.contributor.authorGoldberg, Deborah E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T21:02:02Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T21:02:02Z
dc.date.issued2009-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationRajaniemi, Tara K.; Turkington, Roy; Goldberg, Deborah (2009). "Community-level consequences of species interactions in an annual plant community." Journal of Vegetation Science 20(5): 836-846. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74125>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1100-9233en_US
dc.identifier.issn1654-1103en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74125
dc.description.abstractQuestion : How does the intensity of species interactions affect species and functional group composition of an annual plant community? Location : Sede Boqer, Negev Desert, Israel. Methods : The potential for competitive interactions in two annual plant communities (desert and coastal) from semi-stabilized sand dunes was manipulated by varying seed bank density and therefore the number of potentially interacting individuals. Communities were exposed to three different irrigation regimes, mimicking precipitation at the desert site, the coastal site, and an intermediate precipitation level. Plots were maintained for 3 years, and percentage cover of each species in the plots was recorded at the end of each growing season. We used redundancy analysis to test for effects of initial density, irrigation, and year on the species and functional group composition of the communities. Results : Initial density had significant effects on species composition, and these effects remained significant over 3 years, even as total community percentage cover became more similar among treatments over time. Density effects did not depend on resource availability (irrigation level). Functional group identity or individual plant size did not predict which species would be good competitors, and a species' competitive ability did not predict its abundance in the field. Conclusions : Species interactions strongly affect community composition, and those effects carry over into subsequent years such that competition does not lead to convergence in community structure over time. However, the particular changes in composition observed were not predictable by some of the traits that have been found important in individual-level experiments. We speculate that the outcome of competition in diverse communities will depend on multiple traits, in contrast to the outcome of individual-level pairwise experiments. We also speculate that the shift in composition with density could mean that local variation in density may contribute to maintenance of diversity in this system.en_US
dc.format.extent294789 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights© 2009 International Association for Vegetation Scienceen_US
dc.subject.otherCommunity Densityen_US
dc.subject.otherCompetitionen_US
dc.subject.otherConvergenceen_US
dc.subject.otherDesert Annualsen_US
dc.subject.otherFunctional Group Compositionen_US
dc.subject.otherSpecies Compositionen_US
dc.titleCommunity-level consequences of species interactions in an annual plant communityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1048, USA ;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherBiology Department, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, 285 Old Westport Road, North Dartmouth, MA 02747, USA ;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Botany, and Biodiversity Research Center, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada BC V6T 1Z4 ;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherE-mail royt@interchange.ubc.ca ;en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherE-mail degold@umich.eduen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/74125/1/j.1654-1103.2009.01086.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1654-1103.2009.01086.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Vegetation Scienceen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAerts, R. 1999. Interspecific competition in natural plant communities: mechanisms, trade-offs and plant–soil feedbacks. Journal of Experimental Botany 50: 29 – 37.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBertness, M.D. & Callaway, R. 1994. Positive interactions in communities. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 9: 191 – 193.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCahill, J.F., Kembel, S.W. & Gustafson, D.J. 2005. Differential genetic influences on competitive effect and response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Ecology 93: 958 – 967.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChapin, F.S. 1980. The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 233 – 260.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChase, J.M. & Leibold, M.A. 2003. Ecological niches: linking classical and contemporary approaches. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChesson, P.L. & Warner, R.R. 1981. Environmental variability promotes coexistence in lottery competitive systems. American Naturalist 117: 923 – 943.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCraine, J.M. 2005. Reconciling plant strategy theories of Grime and Tilman. Journal of Ecology 93: 1041 – 1052.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCraine, J.M., Froehle, J., Tilman, D.G., Wedin, D.A. & Chapin, F.S. 2001. The relationships among root and leaf traits of 76 grassland species and relative abundance along fertility and disturbance gradients. Oikos 93: 274 – 285.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDarlington, H.T. & Steinbauer, G.P. 1961. The eighty-year period for Dr. Beal's seed viability experiment. American Journal of Botany 48: 321 – 325.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeinbrun-Dothan, N. & Danin, A. 1991. Analytical flora of the land of Israel. Cana, Jerusalem.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGaudet, C.L. & Keddy, P.A. 1988. A comparative approach to predicting competitive ability from plant traits. Nature 334: 242 – 243.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldberg, D.E. 1990. Components of resource competition in plant communities. In: Grace, J.B. & Tilman, D. (eds.) Perspectives on plant competition. pp. 27 – 49. Academic Press, San Diego.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldberg, D.E. 1994. Influence of competition at the community level: an experimental version of the null models approach. Ecology 75: 1503 – 1506.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldberg, D.E. & Barton, A.M. 1992. Patterns and consequences of interspecific competition in natural communities: a review of field experiments with plants. American Naturalist 139: 771 – 801.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldberg, D.E. & Estabrook, G.F. 1998. Separating the effects of number of individuals sampled and competition on species diversity: an experimental and analytic approach. Journal of Ecology 86: 983 – 988.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldberg, D.E. & Landa, K. 1991. Competitive effect and response: hierarchies and correlated traits in the early stages of competition. Journal of Ecology 79: 1013 – 1030.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldberg, D.E., Turkington, R. & Olsvig-Whittaker, L. 1995. Quantifying the community-level consequences of competition. Folia Geobotanica & Phytotaxonomica 30: 231 – 242.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldberg, D.E., Rajaniemi, T., Gurevitch, J. & Stewart-Oaten, A. 1999. Empirical approaches to quantifying interaction intensity: competition and facilitation along productivity gradients. Ecology 80: 1118 – 1131.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldberg, D.E., Turkington, R., Olsvig-Whittaker, L. & Dyer, A.R. 2001. Density dependence in an annual plant community: variation among life history stages. Ecological Monographs 71: 423 – 446.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrime, J.P. 1973. Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetation. Nature 242: 344 – 347.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrime, J.P. 1979. Plant strategies and vegetation processes. John Wiley and Sons, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoward, T.G. 2001. The relationship of total and per-gram rankings in competitive effect to the natural abundance of herbaceous perennials. Journal of Ecology 89: 110 – 117.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuston, M. 1979. A general hypothesis of species diversity. American Naturalist 113: 81 – 101.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeddy, P.A. 1990. Competitive hierarchies and centrifugal organization in plant communities. In: Grace, J. & Tilman, D. (eds.) Perspectives on plant competition. pp. 265 – 290. Academic Press, San Diego.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeddy, P.A. 2001. Competition. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeddy, P.A., Twolan-Strutt, L. & Wisheu, I.C. 1994. Competitive effect and response rankings in 20 wetland plants: are they consistent across three environments? Journal of Ecology 82: 635 – 643.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLenssen, J.P.M., van de Steeg, H.M. & de Kroon, H. 2004. Does disturbance favour weak competitors? Mechanisms of changing plant abundance after flooding. Journal of Vegetation Science 15: 305 – 314.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcPeek, M.A. & Peckarsky, B.L. 1998. Life histories and the strengths of species interactions: combining mortality, growth, and fecundity effects. Ecology 79: 867 – 879.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeyer, S.E., Quinney, D. & Weaver, J. 2006. A stochastic population model for Lepidium papilliferum (Brassicaceae), a rare desert ephemeral with a persistent seed bank. American Journal of Botany 93: 891 – 902.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMichalet, R., Brooker, R.W., Cavieres, L.A., Kikvidze, Z., Lortie, C.J., Pugnaire, F.I., Valiente-Banuet, A. & Callaway, R.M. 2006. Do biotic interactions shape both sides of the humped-back model of species richness in plant communities? Ecology Letters 9: 767 – 773.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoriuchi, K.S., Venable, D.L., Pake, C.E. & Lange, T. 2000. Direct measurement of the seed bank age structure of a Sonoran Desert annual plant. Ecology 81: 1133 – 1138.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewman, E.I. 1973. Competition and diversity in herbaceous vegetation. Nature 244: 310.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOksanen, L., Fretwell, S.D., Arruda, J. & NiemelÄ, P. 1981. Exploitation ecosystems in gradients of primary productivity. The American Naturalist 118: 240 – 261.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRajaniemi, T.K. & Goldberg, D.E. 2000. Quantifying individual- and community-level effects of competition using experimentally determined null species pools. Journal of Vegetation Science 11: 433 – 442.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRajaniemi, T.K., Allison, V.J. & Goldberg, D.E. 2003. Root competition can cause a decline in diversity with increased productivity. Journal of Ecology 91: 407 – 416.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRajaniemi, T.K., Goldberg, D.E., Turkington, R. & Dyer, A.R. 2006. Quantitative partitioning of regional and local processes shaping regional diversity patterns. Ecology Letters 9: 121 – 128.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReynolds, H.L. & Rajaniemi, T.K. 2007. Plant interactions: competition. In: Pugnaire, F.I. & Valladares, F. (eds.) Functional plant ecology. pp. 457 – 480. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoberts, H.A. & Feast, P.M. 1973. Emergence and longevity of seeds of annual weeds in cultivated and undisturbed soil. Journal of Applied Ecology 10: 133 – 143.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShilo-Volin, H., Novoplansky, A., Goldberg, D.E. & Turkington, R. 2005. Density regulation in annual plant communities under variable resource levels. Oikos 108: 241 – 252.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSuding, K.N., Goldberg, D.E. & Hartman, K.M. 2003. Relationships among species traits: separating levels of response and identifying linkages to abundance. Ecology 84: 1 – 16.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTaylor, D.R., Aarssen, L.W. & Loehle, C. 1990. On the relationship between r/K selection and environmental carrying capacity: a new habitat template for plant life history strategies. Oikos 58: 239 – 250.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTilman, D. 1982. Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTilman, D. 1988. Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTilman, D. & Pacala, S.W. 1993. The maintenance of species richness in plant communities. In: Ricklefs, R.E. & Schluter, D. (eds.) Species diversity in ecological communities: historical and geographic perspectives. pp. 13 – 25. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZamfir, M. & Goldberg, D.E. 2000. The effect of initial density on interactions between bryophytes at individual and community levels. Journal of Ecology 88: 243 – 255.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.