View Item 

Show simple item record

Effect of absorbable membranes on sandwich bone augmentation
dc.contributor.authorPark, Sang-Hoonen_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, Kwang-wonen_US
dc.contributor.authorOh, Tae-Juen_US
dc.contributor.authorMisch, Carl E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorShotwell, Jeffrey L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hom-Layen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T21:02:31Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T21:02:31Z
dc.date.issued2008-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationPark, Sang-Hoon; Lee, Kwang-won; Oh, Tae-Ju; Misch, Carl E.; Shotwell, Jeffrey; Wang, Hom-Lay (2008). "Effect of absorbable membranes on sandwich bone augmentation." Clinical Oral Implants Research 19(1): 32-41. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74133>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-0501en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74133
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=17956570&dopt=citationen_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives : This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of barrier membranes on sandwich bone augmentation (SBA) for the treatment of implant dehiscence defects. Material and methods : Twenty-six implant-associated buccal dehiscence defects in 22 patients were treated according to the SBA concept – mineralized human cancellous allograft (inner layer), mineralized human cortical allograft (outer layer) and coverage with barrier membrane. The defects were randomly assigned to the bovine collagen membrane (BME) group; acellular dermal matrix (ADM) group; and no membrane group. Measurements at baseline and 6 months re-entry included defect height (DH: from smooth–rough junction to the most apical part of the defect), defect width (DW: at the widest part of the defect), and horizontal defect depth (HDD: at three locations – smooth–rough junction, middle, and most apical portion of the defect). All measurements were taken from a reference stent. Statistical analyses were performed for comparison of intra- and inter-group comparisons. Results : All implants placed were successfully osseointegrated. DH at baseline for three groups were not significantly different ( P =0.858). Mean % DH reductions for ADM, BME, and control groups at 6 months were 73.9±17.6%, 68.1±30.1%, and 63.6±23.9%, respectively, with no significant difference among the groups ( P =0.686). Mean horizontal bone gain, however, was significantly greater for membrane groups (1.7 mm for ADM, 1.6 mm for BME) compared with control group (1 mm) ( P =0.044). Implant exposure resulted in significant reduction in total height gain (79.1±14.3% vs. 57±23.5%, P =0.021). Conclusions : Within the limit of this study, it is concluded that SBA technique achieved predictable clinical outcomes. The addition of absorbable membranes enhanced bone gain in thickness compared with membrane-treated sites. To cite this article: Park S-H, Lee K-w, Oh T-J, Misch CE, Shotwell J, Wang H-L. Effect of absorbable membranes on sandwich bone augmentation. Clin. Oral Impl. Res . 19 , 2008; 32–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01408.xen_US
dc.format.extent1582067 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rights© 2007 Blackwell Munksgaarden_US
dc.subject.otherAbsorbable Membraneen_US
dc.subject.otherAcellular Dermal Matrixen_US
dc.subject.otherGuided Bone Regenerationen_US
dc.subject.otherMucogingival Pouch Flapen_US
dc.subject.otherSandwich Bone Augmentationen_US
dc.titleEffect of absorbable membranes on sandwich bone augmentationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumFormerly School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherSchool of Dentistry, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherPeriodontics, School of Dentistry, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid17956570en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/74133/1/j.1600-0501.2007.01408.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01408.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceClinical Oral Implants Researchen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTakata, T., Wang, H.L. & Miyauchi, M. ( 2001a ) Migration of osteoblastic cells on various guided bone regeneration membranes. Clinical Oral Implants Research 12: 332 – 338.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceal-Arrayed, F., Adam, S., Moran, J. & Dowell, P. ( 1995 ) Clinical trial of cross-linked human type I collagen as a barrier material in surgical periodontal treatment. Journal of Clinical Periodontol 22: 371 – 379.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAntoun, H., Sitbon, J.M., Martinez, H. & Missika, P. ( 2001 ) A prospective randomized study comparing two techniques of bone augmentation: onlay graft alone or associated with a membrane. Clinical Oral Implants Research 12: 632 – 639.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencevon Arx, T. & Kurt, B. ( 1999 ) Implant placement and simultaneous ridge augmentation using autogenous bone and a micro titanium mesh: a prospective clinical study with 20 implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research 10: 24 – 33.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAugthun, M., Yildirim, M., Spiekermann, H. & Biesterfeld, S. ( 1995 ) Healing of bone defects in combination with immediate implants using the membrane technique. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 10: 421 – 428.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBatista, E.L. Jr, Batista, F.C. & Novaes, A.B. Jr ( 2001 ) Management of soft tissue ridge deformities with acellular dermal matrix. Clinical approach and outcome after 6 months of treatment. Journal of Periodontology 72: 265 – 273.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBauer, T.W. & Muschler, G.F. ( 2000 ) Bone graft materials. An overview of the basic science. Clinical Orthopedic Related Research 371: 10 – 27.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBecker, W., Dahlin, C., Becker, B.E., Lekholm, U., van Steenberghe, D., Higuchi, K. & Kultje, C. ( 1994 ) The use of e-PTFE barrier membranes for bone promotion around titanium implants placed into extraction sockets: a prospective multicenter study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 9: 31 – 40.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlanco, J., Alonso, A. & Sanz, M. ( 2005 ) Long-term results and survival rate of implants treated with guided bone regeneration: a 5-year case series prospective study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 16: 294 – 301.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBunyaratavej, P. & Wang, H.L. ( 2001 ) Collagen membranes: a review. Journal of Periodontology 72: 215 – 229.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuser, D., Dula, K., Lang N, P. & Nyman, S. ( 1996 ) Long-term stability of osseointegrated implants in bone regenerated with the membrane technique. 5-year results of a prospective study with 12 implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research 7: 175 – 183.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarpio, L., Loza, J., Lynch, S. & Genco, R. ( 2000 ) Guided bone regeneration around endosseous implants with anorganic bovine bone mineral. A randomized controlled trial comparing bioabsorbable versus non-resorbable barriers. Journal of Periodontology 71: 1743 – 1749.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChiapasco, M., Romeo, E., Casentini, P. & Rimondini, L. ( 2004 ) Alveolar distraction osteogenesis vs. vertical guided bone regeneration for the correction of vertically deficient edentulous ridges: a 1–3-year prospective study on humans. Clinical Oral Implants Research 15: 82 – 95.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChristensen, D.K., Karoussis, I.K., Joss, A., Hammerle, C.H. & Lang, N.P. ( 2003 ) Simultaneous or staged installation with guided bone augmentation of transmucosal titanium implants. A 3-year prospective cohort study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 14: 680 – 686.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCordioli, G., Majzoub, Z. & Riachi, F. ( 1999 ) Postloading behavior of regenerated tissues in GBR-treated implant sites. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 19: 44 – 55.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCummings, L.C., Kaldahl, W.B. & Allen, E.P. ( 2005 ) Histologic evaluation of autogenous connective tissue and acellular dermal matrix grafts in humans. Journal of Periodontology 76: 178 – 186.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDahlin, C., Andersson, L. & Linde, A. ( 1991 ) Bone augmentation at fenestrated implants by an osteopromotive membrane technique. A controlled clinical study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2: 159 – 165.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDahlin, C., Lekholm, U., Becker, W., Becker, B., Higuchi, K., Callens, A. & van Steenberghe, D. ( 1995 ) Treatment of fenestration and dehiscence bone defects around oral implants using the guided tissue regeneration technique: a prospective multicenter study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 10: 312 – 318.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDahlin, C., Sennerby, L., Lekholm, U., Linde, A. & Nyman, S. ( 1989 ) Generation of new bone around titanium implants using a membrane technique: an experimental study in rabbits. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 4: 19 – 25.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe Sanctis, M., Zucchelli, G. & Clauser, C. ( 1996 ) Bacterial colonization of bioabsorbable barrier material and periodontal regeneration. Journal of Periodontology 67: 1193 – 1200.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDonos, N., Kostopoulos, L. & Karring, T. ( 2002a ) Augmentation of the mandible with GTR and onlay cortical bone grafting: An experimental study in the rat. Clinical Oral Implants Research 13: 175 – 184.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDonos, N., Kostopoulos, L. & Karring, T. ( 2002b ) Alveolar ridge augmentation by combining autogenous mandibular bone grafts and non-resorbable membranes: an experimental study in the rat. Clinical Oral Implants Research 13: 185 – 191.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDonos, N., Kostopoulos, L. & Karring, T. ( 2002c ) Augmentation of the rat jaw with autogeneic cortico-cancellous bone grafts and guided tissue regeneration. Clinical Oral Implants Research 13: 192 – 202.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDonos, N., Kostopoulos, L. & Karring, T. ( 2002d ) Alveolar ridge augmentation using a resorbable copolymer membrane and autogenous bone grafts. An experimental study in the rat. Clinical Oral Implants Research 13: 203 – 213.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFiorellini, J.P., Engebretson, S.P., Donath, K. & Weber, H.P. ( 1998 ) Guided bone regeneration utilizing expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes in combination with submerged and non-submerged dental in plants in beagle dogs. Journal of Periodontology 69: 528 – 535.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFowler, E.B., Breault, L.G. & Rebitski, G. ( 2000a ) Ridge preservation utilizing an acellular dermal allograft and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft: part I. A report of 2 cases. Journal of Periodontology 71: 1353 – 1359.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFowler, E.B., Breault, L.G. & Rebitski, G. ( 2000b ) Ridge preservation utilizing an acellular dermal allograft and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft: part II. Immediate endosseous implant placement. Journal of Periodontology 71: 1360 – 1364.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFugazzotto, P.A. ( 1997 ) Success and failure rates of osseointegrated implants in function in regenerated bone for 6 to 51 months: a preliminary report. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 12: 17 – 24.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFugazzotto, P.A. ( 2005 ) Success and failure rates of osseointegrated implants in function in regenerated bone for 72 to 133 months. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 20: 77 – 83.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGelb, D.A. ( 1993 ) Immediate implant surgery: three-year retrospective evaluation of 50 consecutive cases. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 8: 388 – 399.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGher, M.E., Quintero, G., Assad, D., Monaco, E. & Richardson, A.C. ( 1994 ) Bone grafting and guided bone regeneration for immediate dental implants in humans. Journal of Periodontology 65: 881 – 891.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldberg, V.M. & Stevenson, S. ( 1987 ) Natural history of autografts and allografts. Clinical Orthopedic Related Research 225: 7 – 16.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGriffin, T.J., Cheung, W.S. & Hirayama, H. ( 2004 ) Hard and soft tissue augmentation in implant therapy using acellular dermal matrix. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 24: 352 – 361.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHammerle, C.H., Jung, R.E. & Feloutzis, A. ( 2002 ) A systematic review of the survival of implants in bone sites augmented with barrier membranes (guided bone regeneration) in partially edentulous patients. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 29 ( s3 ): 226 – 231.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarris, R.J. ( 2002 ) Cellular dermal matrix used for root coverage: 18-month follow-up observation. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 22: 156 – 163.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHenderson, R.D., Greenwell, H., Drisko, C., Regennitter, F.J., Lamb, J.W., Mehlbauer, M.J., Goldsmith, L.J. & Rebitski, G. ( 2001 ) Predictable multiple site root coverage using an acellular dermal matrix allograft. Journal of Periodontology 72: 571 – 582.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHermann, J.S. & Buser, D. ( 1996 ) Guided bone regeneration for dental implants. Current Opinion in Periodontology 3: 168 – 177.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHockers, T., Abensur, D., Valentini, P., Legrand, R. & Hammerle, C.H. ( 1999 ) The combined use of bioresorbable membranes and xenografts or autografts in the treatment of bone defects around implants. A study in beagle dogs. Clinical Oral Implants Research 10: 487 – 498.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJovanovic, S.A., Schenk, R.K., Orsini, M. & Kenney, E.B. ( 1995 ) Supracrestai bone formation around dental implants: an experimental dog study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 10: 23 – 31.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJovanovic, S.A., Spiekermann, H. & Richter, E.J. ( 1992 ) Bone regeneration around titanium dental implants in dehisced defect sites: a clinical study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 7: 233 – 245.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLang, N.P., Hammerle, C.H., Bragger, U., Lehmann, B. & Nyman, S.R. ( 1994 ) Guided tissue regeneration in jawbone defects prior to implant placement. Clinical Oral Implants Research 5: 92 – 97.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLekholm, U., Becker, W., Dahlin, C., Becker, B., Donath, K. & Morrison, E. ( 1993 ) The role of early versus late removal of GTAM membranes on bone formation at oral implants placed into immediate extraction sockets. An experimental study in dogs. Clinical Oral Implants Research 4: 121 – 129.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLekholm, U., Sennerby, L., Roos, J. & Becker, W. ( 1996 ) Soft tissue and marginal bone conditions at osseointegrated implants that have exposed threads: a 5-year retrospective study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofac Implants 11: 599 – 604.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLinde, A., Thoren, C., Dahlin, C. & Sandberg, E. ( 1993 ) Creation of new bone by an osteopromotive membrane technique: an experimental study in rats. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 51: 892 – 897.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLivesey, S.A., Herndon, D.N., Hollyoak, M.A., Atkinson, Y.H. & Nag, A. ( 1995 ) Transplanted acellular allograft dermal matrix. Potential as a template for the reconstruction of viable dermis. Transplantation 60: 1 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLorenzoni, M., Pertl, C., Keil, C. & Wegscheider, W.A. ( 1998 ) Treatment of peri-implant defects with guided bone regeneration: a comparative clinical study with various membranes and bone grafts. lnternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial implants 13: 639 – 646.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLorenzoni, M., Pertl, C., Polansky, R.A., Jakse, N. & Wegscheider, W.A. ( 2002 ) Evaluation of implants placed with barrier membranes. A retrospective follow-up study up to five years. Clinical Oral Implants Research 13: 274 – 280.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLuczyszyn, S.M., Papalexiou, V., Novaes, A.B Jr, Grisi, M.F., Souza, S.L. & Taba, M. Jr ( 2005 ) Acellular dermal matrix and hydroxyapatite in prevention of ridge deformities after tooth extraction. Implant Dentistry 14: 176 – 184.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLundgren, D., Sennerby, L., Falk, H., Friberg, B. & Nyman, S. ( 1994 ) The use of a new bioresorbable barrier for guided bone regeneration in connection with implant installation. Case reports. Clinical Oral Implants Research 5: 177 – 184.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLyford, R.H., Mills, M.P., Knapp, C.I., Scheyer, E.T. & Mellonig, J.T. ( 2003 ) Clinical evaluation of freeze-dried block allografts for alveolar ridge augmentation: a case series. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 23: 417 – 425.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMachtei, E.E. ( 2001 ) The effect of membrane exposure on the outcome of regenerative procedures in humans: a meta-analysis. Journal of Periodontology 72: 512 – 516.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMachtei, E.E., Cho, M.I., Dunford, R., Norderyd, J., Zambon, J.J. & Genco, R.J. ( 1994 ) Clinical, microbiological, and histological factors which influence the success of regenerative periodontal therapy. Journal of Periodontology 65: 154 – 161.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarinucci, L., Lilli, C., Baroni, T., Becchetti, E., Belcastro, S., Balducci, C. & Locci, P. ( 2001 ) In vitro comparison of bioabsorbable and non-resorbable membranes in bone regeneration. Journal of Periodontology 72: 753 – 759.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMattout, P., Nowzari, H. & Mattout, C. ( 1995 ) Clinical evaluation of guided bone regeneration at exposed parts of branemark dental implants with and without bone allograft. Clinical Oral Implants Research 6: 189 – 195.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMelcher, A.H. ( 1969 ) Role of the periosteum in repair of wounds of the parietal bone of the rat. Archives of Oral Biology 14: 1101 – 1109.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMelcher, A.H. ( 1976 ) On the repair potential of periodontal tissues. Journal of Periodontology 47: 256 – 260.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMelcher, A.H. & Accursi, G.E. ( 1971 ) Osteogenic capacity of periosteal and osteoperiosteal flaps elevated from the parietal bone of the rat. Archives of Oral Biology 16: 573 – 580.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMellonig, J.T., Nevins, M. & Sanchez, R. ( 1998a ) Evaluation of a bioabsorbable physical barrier for guided bone regeneration. Part I. Material alone. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 18: 139 – 149.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMellonig, J.T., Nevins, M. & Sanchez, R. ( 1998b ) Evaluation of a bioabsorbable physical barrier for guided bone regeneration. Part II. Material and a bone replacement graft. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 18: 129 – 137.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMombelli, A., Lang, N.P. & Nyman, S. ( 1993 ) Isolation of periodontal species after guided tissue regeneration. Journal of Periodontology 64: 1171 – 1175.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoses, O., Pitaru, S., Artzi, Z. & Nemcovsky, C.E. ( 2005 ) Healing of dehiscence-type defects in implants placed together with different barrier membranes: a comparative clinical study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 16: 210 – 219.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNemcovsky, C.E. & Artzi, Z. ( 2002 ) Comparative study of buccal dehiscence defects in immediate, delayed, and late maxillary implant placement with collagen membranes: clinical healing between placement and second-stage surgery. Journal of Periodontology 73: 754 – 761.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNevins, M., Mellonig, J.T., Clem, D.S., Reiser, G.M. & Buser, D.A. ( 1998 ) Implants in regenerated bone: long-term survival. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 18: 34 – 45.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNovaes, A.B. Jr, Papalexiou, V., Luczyszyn, S.M., Muglia, V.A., Souza, S.L.S. & Taba, M. Jr ( 2002 ) Immediate implant in extraction socket with acellular dermal matrix graft and bioactive glass: a case report. Implant Dentistry 11: 343 – 348.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNovaes, A.B. & Souza, S.L. ( 2001 ) Acellular dermal matrix graft as a membrane for guided bone regeneration: a case report. Implant Dentistry 10: 192 – 196.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNowzari, H. & Slots, J. ( 1995 ) Microbiologic and clinical study of polytetrafluoroethylene membranes for guided bone regeneration around implants. lnternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 10: 67 – 73.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOh, T.J., Meraw, S.J., Lee, E.J., Giannobile, W.V. & Wang, H.L. ( 2003 ) Comparative analysis of collagen membranes for the treatment of implant dehiscence defects. Clinical Oral Implants Research 14: 80 – 90.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOwens, K.W. & Yukna, R.A. ( 2001 ) Collagen membrane resorption in dogs: a comparative study. Implant Dentistry 10: 49 – 58.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePalmer, R.M., Floyd, P.D., Palmer, P.J., Smith, B.J., Johansson, C.B. & Albrektsson, T. ( 1994 ) Healing of implant dehiscence defects with and without expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes: a controlled clinical and histological study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 5: 98 – 104.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePark, S.H. & Wang, H.L. ( 2005 ) Mucogingival pouch flap (MPF) for sandwich bone augmentation. Implant Dentistry 14: 349 – 354.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePostlethwaite, A.E., Seyer, J.M. & Kang, A.H. ( 1978 ) Chemotactic attraction of human fibroblasts to type I, II, and III collagens and collagen-derived peptides. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences USA 75: 871 – 875.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRasmusson, L., Meredith, N., Kahnberg, K.E. & Sennerby, L. ( 1999 ) Effects of barrier membranes on bone resorption and implant stability in onlay bone grafts: An experimental study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 10: 267 – 277.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReid, C.A., McCarthy, J.G. & Kolber, A.B. ( 1981 ) A study of regeneration in parietal bone defects in rabbits. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 67: 591 – 596.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmid, J., Hammerle, C.H., Olah, A.J. & Lang, N.P. ( 1994 ) Membrane permeability is unnecessary for guided generation of new bone. An experimental study in the rabbit. Clinical Oral Implants Research 5: 125 – 130.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSelvig, K.A., Kersten, B.G., Chamberlain, A.D., Wikesjo, U.M. & Nilveus, R.E. ( 1992 ) Regenerative surgery of intrabony periodontal defects using ePTFE barrier membranes: scanning electron microscopic evaluation of retrieved membranes versus clinical healing. Journal of Periodontology 63: 974 – 978.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSevor, J.J., Meffert, R.M. & Cassingham, R.J. ( 1993 ) Regeneration of dehisced alveolar bone adjacent to endosseous dental implants utilizing a resorbable collagen membrane: clinical and histologic results. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 13: 71 – 83.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimion, M., Baldoni, M., Rossi, P. & Zaffe, D. ( 1994a ) A comparative study of the effectiveness of e-PTFE membranes with and without early exposure during the healing period. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 14: 166 – 180.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimion, M., Dahlin, C., Trisi, P. & Piattelli, A. ( 1994b ) Qualitative and quantitative comparative study on different filling materials used in bone tissue regeneration: a controlled clinical study. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 14: 198 – 215.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimion, M., Jovanovic, S.A., Tinti, C. & Benfenati, S.P. ( 2001 ) Long-term evaluation of osseointegrated implants inserted at the time or after vertical ridge augmentation. A retrospective study on 123 implants with 1–5 year follow-up. Clinical Oral Implants Research 12: 35 – 45.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpray, J.R., Black, C.G., Morris, H.F. & Ochi, S. ( 2000 ) The influence of bone thickness on facial marginal bone response: stage 1 placement through stage 2 uncovering. Annals of Periodontology 5: 119 – 128.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStein, M.D., Salkin, L.M., Freedman, A.L. & Glushko, V. ( 1985 ) Collagen sponge as a topical hemostatic agent in mucogingival surgery. Journal of Periodontology 56: 35 – 38.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTakata, T., Wang, H.L. & Miyauchi, M. ( 2001b ) Attachment, proliferation and differentiation of periodontal ligament cells on various guided tissue regeneration membranes. Journal of Periodontal Research 36: 322 – 327.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTawil, G., El-Ghoule, G. & Mawla, M. ( 2001 ) Clinical evaluation of a bilayered collagen membrane (Bio-Gide) supported by autografts in the treatment of bone defects around implants. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 16: 857 – 863.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTempro, P.J. & Nalbandian, J. ( 1993 ) Colonization of retrieved polytetrafluoroethylene membranes: morphological and microbiological observations. Journal of Periodontology 64: 162 – 168.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVanden Bogaerde, L. ( 2004 ) A proposal for the classification of bony defects adjacent to dental implants. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 24: 264 – 271.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang, H.L., Misch, C. & Neiva, R.F. ( 2004 ) “Sandwich” bone augmentation technique: rationale and report of pilot cases. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 24: 232 – 245.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang, H.L., Miyauchi, M. & Takata, T. ( 2002 ) Initial attachment of osteoblasts to various guided bone regeneration membranes: an in vitro study. Journal of Periodontal Research 37: 340 – 344.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeng, D., Hurzeler, M.B., Quinones, C.R., Ohlms, A. & Caffesse, R.G. ( 2000 ) Contribution of the periosteum to bone formation in guided bone regeneration. A study in monkeys. Clinical Oral Implants Research 11: 546 – 554.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZitzmann, N.U., Naef, R. & Scharer, P. ( 1997 ) Resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes in combination with Bio-Oss for guided bone regeneration. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 12: 844 – 852.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZitzmann, N.U., Scharer, P. & Marinello, C.P. ( 1999 ) Factors influencing the success of GBR. Smoking, timing of implant placement, implant location, bone quality and provisional restoration. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 26: 673 – 682.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZitzmann, N.U., Scharer, P. & Marinello, C.P. ( 2001 ) Long-term results of implants treated with guided bone regeneration: a 5-year prospective study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 16: 355 – 366.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1600-0501.2007.01408.x.pdf
Size:
1.508MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.