View Item 

Show simple item record

Effect of bur type and conditioning on the surface and interface of dentine
dc.contributor.authorBarros, J. A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMyaki, S. I.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNör, J. E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPeters, M. C.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T21:04:45Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T21:04:45Z
dc.date.issued2005-11en_US
dc.identifier.citationBARROS, J. A.; MYAKI, S. I.; NÖR, J. E.; PETERS, M. C. (2005). "Effect of bur type and conditioning on the surface and interface of dentine." Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 32(11): 849-856. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74168>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0305-182Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1365-2842en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74168
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?cmd=retrieve&db=pubmed&list_uids=16202050&dopt=citationen_US
dc.format.extent414769 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Science Ltden_US
dc.rights2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.subject.otherNon-rinse Conditioneren_US
dc.subject.otherSmear Layeren_US
dc.subject.otherResin/Dentine Interfaceen_US
dc.titleEffect of bur type and conditioning on the surface and interface of dentineen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationum* Department of Cariology, Restorative Sciences and Endodontics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Pediatrics, UNESP-SJC, SÃo JosÉ dos Campos, SP, Brasilen_US
dc.identifier.pmid16202050en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/74168/1/j.1365-2842.2005.01507.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01507.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Oral Rehabilitationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEick JD, Gwinnett AJ, Pashley DH, Robinson SJ. Current concepts on adhesion to dentin. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1997; 8: 306 – 335.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlunk U. In: Roulet JF, Degrange M, eds. Adhesives: Principles and State of Art, Adhesion – the silent revolution in dentistry. Carol Stream, IL: Quintessence Publishing Co; 2000: 29 – 44.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEick JD, Wilko RA, Anderson CH. Scanning electron microscopy of cut tooth surfaces and identification of debris by use of the electron microprobe. J Dent Res. 1970; 49: 1359 – 1368.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGwinnett AJ. Smear layer: morphological considerations. Oper Dent. 1984; 3: 2 – 12.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrÄnnstrÖm M, Glantz PO, Nordenvall KJ. The effect of some cleaning solutions on the morphology of dentin prepared in different ways: an in vivo study. ASDC J Dent Child. 1979; 46: 291 – 295.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShortall AC. Cavity cleansers in restorative dentistry. Preliminary results from an in vitro scanning electron microscope study. Br Dent J. 1981; 150: 243 – 247.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSantini A, Mitchell S. A scanning electron microscopic study of the effect of Gluma CPS bonding system on dentinal smear layer produced by different bur types and rotational speeds and on the resin-dentin interface. Quintessence Int. 1998; 29: 737 – 747.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePerdigÃo J, Lopes M. Dentin Bonding – State of the Art 1999. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1999; 20: 1151 – 1158, 1160 – 1162, 1164.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePashley D. Dentin bonding: overview of the substrate with respect to adhesive material. J Esthet Dent. 1991; 3: 46 – 50.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwift EJ, PerdigÃo J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief history and state of art. Quintessence Int. 1995; 26: 95 – 110.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTagami J, Tao L, Pashley DH. Correlation among dentin depth, permeability, and bond strength of adhesive resins. Dent Mater. 1990; 6: 45 – 50.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Inoue S, Yoshida Y, PerdigÃo J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Microscopy investigations. Techniques, results, limitations. Am J Dent. 2000; 13: 3D – 18D.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference13. NRC. Non-rinse conditioner technical manual. Konstanz: Dentsply DeTrey GmBH; 1998.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaba N, Taira Y, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Surface treatment of dentin with Gluma and iron compounds for bonding indirect restorations. J Oral Rehabil. 2002; 29: 1052 – 1058.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNÖr JE, Feigal RJ, Dennison JB, Edwards CA. Dentin Bonding: SEM comparison of the dentin surface in primary and permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent. 1997; 19: 246 – 252.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOgata M, Harada N, Yamaguchi S, Nakajima M, Tagami J. Effect of self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid etchant on bonding to bur-prepared dentin. Oper Dent. 2002; 27: 447 – 454.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNÖr JE, Feigal RJ, Dennison JB, Edwards CA. Dentin Bonding: SEM comparison of the resin–dentin interface in primary and permanent teeth. J Dent Res. 1996; 75: 1396 – 1403.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePerdigÃo J, Lambrechts P, Meerbeek BV, TomÉ AR, Vanherle G, Lopes AB. Morphological field emission – SEM study of the effect of six phosphoric acid etching agents on human dentin. Dent Mater. 1996; 12: 262 – 271.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAyad M. Effects of rotatory instrumentation and different etchants on removal of smear layer on human dentin. J Prosth Dent. 2001; 85: 67 – 72.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOliveira SSA, Pugach MK, Hilton JF, Watanabe LG, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW Jr. The influence of the dentin smear layer on adhesion: a self-etching primer vs. a total-etch system. Dent Mat. 2003; 19: 758 – 767.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTani C, Finger WJ. Effect of smear layer thickness on bond strength mediated by three all-in-one self-etching priming adhesives. J Adhes Dent. 2002; 4: 283 – 289.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRontani RM, Ducatti CH, Garcia-Godoy F, De Goes MF. Effect of etching agent on dentinal adhesive interface in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2000; 24: 205 – 209.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePerdigÃo J, Denehy GE, Swift EJ Jr. Silica contamination of etched dentin and enamel surfaces: a scanning electron microscopic and bond strength study. Quintessence Int. 1994; 25: 327 – 333.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceÇehreli ZC, Altay N. Etching effect of 17% EDTA and a non-rinse conditioner (NRC) on primary enamel and dentin. Am J Dent. 2000; 13: 64 – 68.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaghdadi ZD. Bond strength of Dyract AP compomer material to dentin of permanent and primary molars: phosphoric acid versus non-rinse conditioner. J Dent Child. 2003; 70: 145 – 152.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNation JL. A new method using hexamethyldisilazane for preparation of soft insect tissues for scanning electron microscopy. Stain Technol. 1983; 58: 347 – 351.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarvalho RM, Yoshiyama M, Brewer PD, Pashley DH. Dimensional changes of demineralized human dentine during preparation for scanning electron microscopy. Arch Oral Biol. 1996; 41: 379 – 386.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFerrari M, Mannocci F, Kugel G, Garcia-Godoy F. Standardized microscopic evaluation of the bonding mechanism of NRC/Prime & Bond NT. Am J Dent. 1999; 12: 77 – 83.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater. 2001; 17: 296 – 308.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoodley D, Grobler SR, Rossouw RJ, Oberholzer TG, Patel N. In vitro evaluation of two adhesive systems used with compomer filling materials. Int Dent J. 2000; 50: 400 – 406.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLi H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Nanoleakage patterns of four dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater. 2000; 16: 48 – 56.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1365-2842.2005.01507.x.pdf
Size:
405.0KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.