View Item 

Show simple item record

Quantification of stimuli
dc.contributor.authorAsh, Major McKinley, Jr.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-01T21:21:25Z
dc.date.available2010-06-01T21:21:25Z
dc.date.issued1986-08en_US
dc.identifier.citationAsh, Major M. (1986). "Quantification of stimuli." Dental Traumatology 2(4): 153-156. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74421>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-4469en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-9657en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/74421
dc.description.abstract— In the experimental setting where pain or discomfort is elicited, it is imperative that the different types of stimuli used (i.e., chemical, mechanical, thermal, and electrical) be quantified and other important factors be considered: (1) reproducibility of the stimulus, which depends upon its ability to be completely characterized and exactly measured; and (2) control of potential modifying factors winch might influence the pain threshold. Thus, the stimulus must be measurable, reproducible, and behaviorally predictable.en_US
dc.format.extent3450647 bytes
dc.format.extent3109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.rightsMunksgaard 1986en_US
dc.subject.otherDentinal Hypersensitivityen_US
dc.subject.otherTest Stimulien_US
dc.subject.otherPainen_US
dc.subject.otherPain Inductionen_US
dc.titleQuantification of stimulien_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan School of Dentistry, Department of Occlusion, Ann Arbor, Ml, USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/74421/1/j.1600-9657.1986.tb00603.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-9657.1986.tb00603.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceDental Traumatologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceProcacci P, Zoppi M, Marksca J. Experimental pain in man. Pain 1979; 6: 123.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRollman GB. Measurement of experimental pain in chronic pain patients: Methodological and individual factors. In: Melzack R, ed. Pain measurement and assessment. New York: Raven Press. 1983.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith BA, Ash MM. A study of desensitizing dentrifices and cervical hypersensitivity. J Periodontol 1964; 35: 222.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStark MM. Rationalization of electric pulp-testing methods. Oral Surg 1977; 43: 598.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGangarosa LP. Park NH. Practical considerations in iontophoresis of fluoride for desensitizing dentin. J Prosthet Dent 1978: 39: 173.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJensen AL. Hypersensitivity controlled by ionophoresis: double-blind clinical investigation. JADA 1964; 68: 216.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTarbet WJ. An evaluation of two methods for the dentinal hypersensitivity. JADA 1970: 98: 914.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGracely RH. Pain measurement in man. In: Ng LKY, Bonica JJ, eds. Pain discomfort and humanitarian care. New-York: Elsevier/North-Holland, 1980.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeft MW, Parker SR. Perceptual scales for electrical tooth-pulp stimulation. J Dent Res 1981; 60A: 383.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGracely RH. Pain language and ideal pain assessment. In: Melzask R, ed. Pain measurement and assessment. New York: Raven Press, 1983.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJacobson JJ. Probe placement during electric pulp-testing procedures. Oral Surg 1984; 58: 242.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith BA, Ash MM. Evaluation of a desensitizing dentrifice. JADA 1964: 68: 639.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreen BL. Calcium hydroxide and potassium nitrate as desensitizing agents for hypersensitive root surfaces. J Periodont 1977; 48: 667.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCaton J. Depth of periodontal probe penetration related to clinical and histologic signs of gingival inflammation. J Periodontol 1981; 52: 626.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMumfjord JM, BjÖrn H. Problems in electric pulp testing and dental algesimetry. Int Dent J 1062; 12: 161.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMatthews H. Thresholds of vital and of nonvital teeth to stimulation with electric pulp testers. Br Dent J 1974; 137: 352.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBjÖrn H. Electrical excitation of teeth and its application to dentistry. Swed Dent J 1946; Suppl. 39.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMumfjord JM. Pain perception, threshold, and adaptation of normal human teeth. Arch Oral Biol 1965; 10: 957.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStark MM, Pelzner R. Measurement of dentinal hyper-sensitivity. Comp Cont Educ Dent 1982; S105, Suppl. 3.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBonica JJ. The management of Pain. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 1953.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNotermans SLH. Measurements of the pain threshold determined by electrical stimulation and its clinical application. In: Weisenberg M, ed. Pain, clinical and experimental perspectives. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby Co., 1975.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1600-9657.1986.tb00603.x.pdf
Size:
3.290MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.